Advertisement

Endoscopic Treatment of Esophageal Varices: Combination of Endoscopic Variceal Ligation and Endoscopic Injection Sclerotherapy

  • Manabu YamamotoEmail author
  • Hiroaki Suzuki
Chapter

Abstract

Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) was developed by Stiegmann et al. and has been performed using a device that allows aspiration and ligation of varices using rubber bands (O-rings). The advantage of this mechanical therapy rests on elimination of the need for injection of the sclerosant or tissue glues and, hence, obviation of many complications known to be associated with injection therapies. EVL was introduced to Japan by the authors in 1989, and thereafter, it became the first-line procedure especially for acute variceal bleeding.

On the other hand, in our initial experience of EVL in 1989, 20 out of 23 patients with esophageal varices showed an eradication effect as high as 86.9%; however, complete eradication (F0) could only be observed in five patients (21.7%). To obtain better results, we then performed additional endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) using 1% polidocanol, which resulted in a 100% eradication effect with 43.5% complete eradication.

We perform EVL/EIS combined therapy for the prevention of variceal bleeding, and for acute bleeding cases, we have found EVL to be superior to other hemostatic options.

In this chapter, we introduce the historic aspect of EVL as well as our technical improvements including the development of an original device.

Keywords

EVL EIS Polidocanol Esophageal varices Endoscopic treatment 

References

  1. 1.
    Stiegmann GV, Sun JH, Hammond WS. Results of experimental endoscopic esophageal varix ligation. Ann Surg. 1988;54:105.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yamamoto M, Suzuki H, Aoki T, et al. Endoscopic variceal ligation (in Japanese). Endosc Dig. 1990;2:269.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yamamoto M, Suzuki H. Efficacy of endoscopic variceal ligation for esophageal varices (in Japanese). Surgery. 1995;57:657.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Japan Society for Portal Hypertension. The general rules for study of portal hypertension (in Japanese). 3rd ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co., Ltd.; 2013.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ohnishi T, Yamamoto M, Aoki T, et al. Combination of endoscopic variceal legation and endoscopic sclerotherapy with 1% polidocanol: effect on esophageal varices (in Japanese). Prog Dig Endosc. 1991;39:157.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stiegmann GV, Yamamoto M, Goff JS, Reveille RM. Technique and current results of endoscopic of variceal ligation. Prog Dig Endosc. 1991;39:11.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stiegmann GV, Yamamoto M. Approaches to the endoscopic treatment of esophageal varices. World J Surg. 1992;16:1034.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yamamoto M, Stiegmann GV. Current status of band ligation for esophageal varices. Probl Gen Surg. 1992;9:477.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stiegmann GV, Yamamoto M. Endoscopic techniques for the management of active variceal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1992;2:59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yamamoto M, Suzuki H. Technique and current results of endoscopic variceal ligation (in Japanese). Rinsho Geka. 1994;49:411.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamamoto M. Endoscopic variceal ligation. Phys J. 1992;1:66.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yamamoto M, Suzuki H. A technical commentary: endoscopic variceal ligation (in Japanese). Clin Gastroenterol. 1995;10:161.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yamamoto M, Suzuki H. Endoscopic variceal ligation: is the procedure really safe, easy and effective (in Japanese). Endosc Dig. 1995;7:19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yamamoto M, Suzuki H. Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for esophageal varices (in Japanese). Tokyo: Endoscopic Variceal Ligation; 1992. p. 201–8.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goff JS, Reveille RM, Stiegmann GV. Endoscopic sclerotherapy versus endoscopic variceal ligation: esophageal symptoms, complications and motility. Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;83:1240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hall RJ, Lilly JR, Stiegmann GV. Endoscopic esophageal varix ligation: technique and preliminary results in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1988;23:1222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saeed Z, Michaletz P, Winchester C, et al. Endoscopic variceal ligation in patients who have failed sclerotherapy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;36:572–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goff JS, Reveille RM, Sun JH, Stiegmann GV. Three years experience with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) for treatment of bleeding varices. Endoscopy. 1992;24:401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stiegmann GV, Goff JS, Michaletz-Onody PA, et al. Endoscopic sclerotherapy as compared with endoscopic ligation for bleeding esophageal varices. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1527.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    El-Newihi H, Migicovsky B, Laine L. A prospective randomized comparison of sclerotherapy and ligation for the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices (abstract). Gastroenterology. 1991;100:A59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reveille RM, Goff JS, Stiegmann GV, Stauffer JT. Combination endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and low volume sclerotherapy (ES) for bleeding esophageal varices: a faster route to variceal eradication (abstract). Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:243.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Adachi Kyosai HospitalTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of EndoscopyJikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations