Notarization of Knowledge Retrieval from Biomedical Repositories Using Blockchain Technology
Biomedical research and clinical decision depend increasingly on a number of authoritative databases, mostly public and continually enriched via peer scientific contributions. Given the dynamic nature of data and their usage in the sensitive domain of biomedical science, it is important to ensure retrieved data integrity and non-repudiation, that is, ensure that retrieved data cannot be modified after retrieval and that the database cannot validly deny that the particular data has been provided as a result of a specific query. In this paper, we propose the use of blockchain technology in combination with digital signatures to create smart digital contracts to seal the query and the respective results each time a third-party requests evidence from a reference biomedical database. The feasibility of the proposed approach is demonstrated using a real blockchain infrastructure and a publicly available medical risk factor reference repository.
KeywordsBiomedical repositories Cryptographic techniques Blockchain Integrity Non-repudiation
This work was partly supported by the European Commission FP7-ICT project CARRE (Grant No. 611140).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 6.Buterin V (2014) A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. White Paper. http://www.ethereum.org/pdfs/EthereumWhitePaper.pdf
- 7.Carre P (2016) CARRE risk factor reference repository. FP7 EU project (FP7-ICT-611140). https://www.carre-project.eu/innovation/carre-risk-factor-entry-system
- 8.Nakamoto S (2008) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
- 9.Cachin C (2016) Architecture of the hyperledger blockchain fabric. In: Workshop on distributed cryptocurrencies and consensus ledgers (DCCL), Chicago, Illinois, USAGoogle Scholar
- 10.Herrera-Joancomartí J (2015) Research and challenges on bitcoin anonymity. In: Data privacy management, autonomous spontaneous security, and security assurance. LNCS, vol 8872. Springer, Cham, pp 3–16Google Scholar
- 11.Housley R, Ford W, Polk W et al (1998) Internet X. 509 public key infrastructure certificate and CRL profile, pp 2070–1721Google Scholar
- 12.Matsumoto S, Reischuk RM (2016) IKP: turning a PKI around with blockchains. IACR Cryptol ePrint Arch 2016:1018Google Scholar
- 14.Mettler M (2016) Blockchain technology in healthcare: the revolution starts here. In: 18th international conference on e-health networking, applications and services, Munich, Germany, pp 1–3Google Scholar
- 17.Azaria A, Ekblaw A, Vieira T et al (2016) Medrec: using blockchain for medical data access and permission management. In: International Conference on open and big data (OBD), pp 25–30Google Scholar
- 18.Carlisle BG (2014) Proof of prespecified endpoints in medical research with the bitcoin blockchain. Web Blog. The Grey Literature. https://www.bgcarlisle.com/blog/2014/08/25/proof-of-prespecified-endpoints-in-medical-research-with-the-bitcoin-blockchain/. Accessed 29 Aug 2017
- 19.Nugent T, Upton D, Cimpoesu M (2016) Improving data transparency in clinical trials using blockchain smart contracts. F1000Res 5:2541Google Scholar
- 20.Penard W, van Werkhoven T (2008) On the secure hash algorithm family. National Security Agency, Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
- 21.Third A, Kaldoudi E, Gkotsis G et al (2015) Capturing scientific knowledge on medical risk factors. In: 1st International workshop on capturing scientific knowledge, collocated with the 8th international conference on knowledge capture (K-CAP), Palisades, NY, USAGoogle Scholar