Advertisement

Anaerobic Digestion: Factors Affecting Anaerobic Digestion Process

  • Sunil P. Lohani
  • Jouni Havukainen
Chapter
Part of the Energy, Environment, and Sustainability book series (ENENSU)

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a biological decomposition process that occurs in the absence of oxygen. The decomposition of organic matter is a multi-step process of series and parallel reactions namely hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis and methanogene. Most of the control in anaerobic digestion is undertaken directly by the microorganisms themselves; however, the operational conditions such as temperature, pH, essential trace nutrients and toxicants can play a major role in modifying reaction rates of individual sub-processes. The energy performance of the anaerobic digestion is depending mainly on the biogas production technology, raw materials and geographic location (ambient temperature). Since the feedstocks coming to anaerobic digestion have usually lower heating value as received, the usual energy efficiency calculation used for incineration plant is not useful. Most commonly used method is the input/output method, and the estimation is dependent upon the chosen system boundary.

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion Operational conditions Reaction rate Energy performance System boundary 

References

  1. Abdelgadir A, Chen X, Liu J, Xie X, Zhang J, Zhang K, Wang H, Liu N (2014) Characteristics, process parameters, and inner components of anaerobic bioreactors. BioMed Res Int 2014:1–10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/841573
  2. Appels L, Baeyens J, Degreve J, Dewil R (2008) Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Prog Energy Combust Sci 34:755–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arceivala SJ, Asolekar SR (2007) Wastewater treatment for pollution control and reuse. Tata McGraw-Hill, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks C, Chesshire M, Heaven S, Arnold R (2011) Anaerobic digestion of source-segregated domestic food waste: performance assessment by mass and energy balance. Bioresour Technol 102:612–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batstone DJ, Keller J, Angelidaki RI, Kalyuzhnyi SV, Pavlostathis SG, Rozzi A, Sanders WTM, Siegrist H, Vavilin VA (2002) Anaerobic digestion model no. 1 (ADM1). IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendixen HJ (1994) Safeguards against pathogens in Danish biogas plants. Water Sci Technol 30:171–180Google Scholar
  7. Berglund M, Börjesson P (2006) Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production. Biomass Bioenergy 30:254–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bilitewski B, Härdtle G, Marek K (1997) Waste management. Springer, Berlin. ISBN 3-540-59210-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boe K (2006) Online monitoring and control of the biogas process. Ph.D. thesis. Institute of Environment and Resources. Technical University of Denmark (DTU)Google Scholar
  10. Botheju D, Lie B, Bakke R (2010) Oxygen effects in Anaerobic Digestion—II. Modell Ident Control 31:55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cavinato C (2011) Anaerobic digestion fundamentals 1. Summer School on biogas technology for sustainable Second Generation Biofuel Production. http://www.valorgas.soton.ac.uk/Pub_docs/JyU%20SS%202011/CC%201.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2015
  12. Djatkov D et al (2012) New method for assessing the performance of agricultural biogas plants. Renew Energy 40:104–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fidaleo M, Laveccio R (2003) Kinetic study of enzymatic urea hydrolysis in the pH range of 4–9. Chem Biochem Eng 17(4):311–318Google Scholar
  14. Fotidis IA, Karakashev D, Kotsopoulos TA, Martzopoulos GG, Angelidaki I (2013) Effect of ammonium and acetate on methanogenic pathwayand methanogenic community composition. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 83:38–48Google Scholar
  15. Foxon KM, Brouckaert CJ, Remigi E, Buckley CA (2006) The anaerobic baffled reactor: an appropriate technology for onsite sanitation. Water SA 30:44–50Google Scholar
  16. Fujishima S, Miyahara T, Noike T (2000) Effect of moisture content on anaerobic digestion of dewatered sludge: ammonia inhibition to carbohydrate removal and methane production. Water Sci Technol 41(3):119–127Google Scholar
  17. Gerin PA, Vliegen F, Jossart J-M (2008) Energy and CO2 balance of maize and grass as energy crops for anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 99:2620–2627Google Scholar
  18. Gujer W, Zehnder AJB (1983) Conversion processes in anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol 15(8/9):127–167Google Scholar
  19. Halalsheh M, Koppes J, Den Elzen J, Zeeman G, Fayyad M, Lettinga G (2005) Effect of SRT and temperature on biological conversions and the related scum-forming potential. Water Res 39(12):2475–2482Google Scholar
  20. Havukainen J, Uusitalo V, Niskanen A, Kapustina V, Horttanainen M (2014) Evaluation of methods for estimating energy performance of biogas production. Renew Energy 66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.12.011
  21. Hwang MH, Jang NJ, Hyum SH, Kim IS (2004) “Anaerobic biohydrogen production from ethanol fermentation: the role of pH. J Biotechnol 111:297–309Google Scholar
  22. Jansen JK, Jensen AB (2000) Biogas and natural gas fuel mixture for the future. In: 1st world conference and exhibition on biomass for energy and industry, SevillaGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonsson O, Polman E, Jensen JK, Eklund R, Schyl H, Ivarsson S (2003) Sustainable gas enters the European gas distribution system. Danish gas technology center. http://www.dgc.eu/sites/default/files/filarkiv/documents/C0301_sustainable_gas.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2016
  24. Kadam PC, Boone DR (1996) Influence of pH on ammonia accumulation and toxicity in halophilic, Methylotrophic Methanogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 62(12):4486–4492Google Scholar
  25. Khalid A et al (2011) The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. Waste Manag 31:1737–1744Google Scholar
  26. Kim SI, Kim HD, Hyun HS (2000) Effect of particle size and sodium ion concentration on anaerobic thermophilic food waste digestion. Water Sci Technol 41(3):67–73Google Scholar
  27. Laaber M, Madlener R, Kirchmayr R, Braun R (2007) Aufbau eines Bewertungssystems für Biogasanlagen—“Gütesiegel Biogas”Google Scholar
  28. Lacour S et al (2012) Energy and environmental balance of biogas for dual-fuel mobile applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:1745–1753Google Scholar
  29. Lew B, Lustig I, Beliavski M, Tarre S, Green M (2011) An integrated UASB-sludge digester for raw domestic wastewater treatment in temperate climates. Bioresour Technol 102:4921–4924Google Scholar
  30. Liu Y, Tay J (2004) State of the art of biogranulation technology for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol. Adv. 22:533–563Google Scholar
  31. Lusk P (1999) Latest progress in anaerobic digestion. Biocycle 40(7):52–54Google Scholar
  32. Ma J, Frear C, Wang Z, Yu L, Zhao Q, Li X, Chen S (2013) A simple methodology for rate-limiting step determination for anaerobic digestion of complex substrates and effect of microbial community ratio. Bioresour Technol 134:391–395Google Scholar
  33. Mathew AK, Bhui I, Banerjee SN, Goswami R, Shome A, Chakraborty AK, Balachandran S, Chaudhury S (2014) Biogas production from locally available aquatic weeds of Santiniketan through anaerobic digestion. Clean Technol Environ Policy.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0877-6
  34. McCarty PL, Mosey FE (1991) Modelling of anaerobic digestion process (A discussion of concepts). Water Sci Technol 24:17–33Google Scholar
  35. McKeown MR, Hughes D, Collins G, Mahony T, O’Flaherty V (2012) Low-temperature anaerobic digestion for wastewater treatment. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23:444–451Google Scholar
  36. Mittal A (2011) Biological wastewater treatment. Water Today 33–44. http://www.watertoday.org/Article%20Archieve/Aquatech%2012.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2017
  37. Navickas K et al (2012) Influence of different biomass treatment technologies on efficiency of biogas production. In: 2012. 11th international scientific conference engineering for rural development, Jelgava, Latvia, 24–25 May 2012Google Scholar
  38. Ostrem MK, Millrath K, Themelis NJ (2004) Combining anaerobic digestion and waste to energy. In: 12th North America waste to energy conference. Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Parawira W (2012) Enzyme research and applications in biotechnological intensification of biogas production. Crit Rev Biotechnol 32(2):172–186Google Scholar
  40. Prade T, Scensson S-E, Mattsson JE (2012) Energy balances for biogas and solid biofuel production from industrial hemp. Biomass Bioenergy 40:36–52Google Scholar
  41. Rajeshwari KV, Balakrishnan M, Kansal A, Lata K, Kishore VVN (2000) State-of-the-art of anaerobic digestion technology for industrial wastewater treatment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 4:135–156Google Scholar
  42. Salter A, Banks CJ (2009) Establishing an energy balance for crop-based digestion. Water Sci Technol 59:1053–1060Google Scholar
  43. Salter A et al (2005) Establishing an energy balance for crop-based digestion energy. In: 2005. 14th European biomass conference and exhibition: biomass for energy. Industry and Climate Protection, Paris, France, 17–21 Oct 2005Google Scholar
  44. Schievano A, D’Imporzano G, Orzi V, Adani F (2011) On-field study of anaerobic digestion full-scale plants (part II): new approaches on-field study of anaerobic digestion full-scale plants (part II): new approaches. Bioresour Technol 102:8814–8819Google Scholar
  45. Schluter A, Bekel T, Diaz NN, Dondrup M, Eichenlaub R, Gartemann KH, Krahn I, Krause L, Kromeke H, Kruse O, Mussgnug JH, Neuweger H, Niehaus K, Puhler A, Runte KJ, Szczepanowski R, Tauch A, Tilker A, Viehover P, Goesmann A (2008) The metagenome of a biogas-producing microbial community of a production-scale biogas plant fermenter analysed by the 454-pyrosequencing technology. J Biotechnol 136:77–90Google Scholar
  46. Seppälä M et al (2008) Biogas from energy crops—optimal pre-treatments and storage, co-digestion and energy balance in boreal conditions. Water Sci Technol 58:1857–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shanmugam P, Horan NJ (2008) Simple and rapid methods to evaluate methane potential and biomass yield for a range of mixed solid wastes. Bioresour Technol 100(1):471–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith SR, Lang NL, Cheung KHM, Spanoudaki K (2005) Factors controlling pathogen destruction during anaerobic digestion of biowastes. Waste Manag 25(4):417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Speece RE (1996) Anaerobic biotechnology for industrial wastewaters. Archae Press, Nashville, TNGoogle Scholar
  50. Tanaka K (2008) Assessment of energy efficiency performance measures in industry and their application for policy. Energy Policy 36:2887–2902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel DH (2003) Wastewater engineering treatment and reuse. Tata McGraw Hill Education Private LimitedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tuomisto HL, Helenius J (2008) Comparison of energy and greenhouse gas balances of biogas with other transport biofuel options based on domestic agricultural biomass in Finland. Agric Food Sci 17:240–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Lier JB, Sanz Martin JL, Lettinga G (1996) Effect of temperature on the anaerobic thermophilic conversion of volatile fatty acids by dispersed and granular sludge. Water Res 30:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Lier JB, Mohmoud N, Zeeman G (2008) Anaerobic wastewater treatment. In: Biological wastewater treatment, principles, modelling and design, IWA PublishingGoogle Scholar
  55. Wendland C (2008) Anerobic digestion of blackwater and kitchen refuse. Ph.D. thesis. Technical University Hamburg-Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  56. WtERT (2014) Waste to energy research and technology council. http://www.wtert.eu/default.asp?Menue=13&ShowDok=12. Accessed 30 May 2015
  57. Xia A, Cheng J, Murphy DJ (2016) Innovation in biological production and upgrading of methane and hydrogen for use as gaseous transport biofuel. Biotechnol Adv (in press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.009
  58. Yuan H, Zhu N (2016) Progress in inhibition mechanisms and process control of intermediates and by-products in sewage sludge anaerobic digestion. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 58:429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zeeman G (1991) Mesophilic and psychrophilic digestion of liquid manure. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Environmental Technology, Agricultural University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  60. Zeeman G, Sanders W (2001) Potential of anaerobic digestion of complex waste (water). Water Sci Technol 44:115–122Google Scholar
  61. Zeeman G, Sanders WTM, Wang KY, Lettinga G (1996) Anaerobic treatment of complex wastewater and waste activated sludge—application of up-flow anaerobic removal reactor for the removal and pre-hydrolysis of suspended COD. In: Proceeding of the IAWQ-NVA conference on advanced wastewater treatment, Amsterdam, pp 225–232, 23–25 Sept 1996Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringKathmandu UniversityDhulikhelNepal
  2. 2.Sustainability ScienceLappeenranta University of TechnologyLappeenrantaFinland

Personalised recommendations