Hazard-specific Vulnerability Mapping for Water Security in a Shale Gas Context

Chapter
Part of the Global Environmental Studies book series (GENVST)

Abstract

Northeast British Columbia (NEBC) is estimated to hold large reserves of unconventional natural gas and has experienced rapid growth in shale gas development over recent decades. This industrial development has the potential to impact the quality and quantity of surface water and groundwater. In this study, hazard-specific vulnerability mapping was conducted across NEBC to identify areas most vulnerable to water quality and quantity deterioration due to shale gas development activities. Vulnerability represents the combination of a specific hazard threat and the susceptibility of the water system to that threat. Hazard threats (i.e. potential contamination sources and water abstraction) were mapped spatially across the region. The shallow aquifer susceptibility to contamination was assessed using the DRASTIC approach, while the aquifer susceptibility to abstraction was assessed according to aquifer productivity. Surface water susceptibility to contamination was assessed on a watershed basis to describe the propensity for overland flow (i.e. contaminant transport), while surface water susceptibility to water abstractions was assessed using watershed runoff estimates. The spatial distribution of hazard threats and susceptibility were combined to form hazard-specific vulnerability maps for groundwater quality, groundwater quantity, surface water quality and surface water quantity. The vulnerability maps identify priority areas for further research, monitoring and policy development.

Keywords

Shale gas Hazards Water security Vulnerability Northeast British Columbia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada and the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto, Japan.

References

  1. Aller L, T Bennett, J Lehr, R Petty and G Hackett (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using Hydrogeologic settings. EPA-600/2-87-035, National Water Well Association, Dublin, Ohio / EPA Ada. OklahomaGoogle Scholar
  2. BC Oil and Gas Commission (BCOGC) (2013) Water use for oil and gas activity: annual reportGoogle Scholar
  3. BC Oil and Gas Commission (BCOGC) (2014) 2013/2014 Annual service plan reportGoogle Scholar
  4. Berardinucci J, Ronneseth K (2002) Guide to using the BC aquifer classification maps for the protection and Management of Groundwater. In: British Columbia Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, Victoria, 54 pagesGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapman A, Kerr B, Wilford D (2012) Hydrological modelling and decision-support tool development for water allocation, northeastern British Columbia. In: Geoscience BC summary of activities 2011, geoscience BC, report 2012–1, pp 81–86Google Scholar
  6. Council of Canadian Academies (2014) Environmental impacts of shale gas extraction in Canada. The expert panel on harnessing science and technology to understand the environmental impacts of shale gas extraction. Council of Canadian Academies, Ottawa, p 266Google Scholar
  7. Holding S, Allen DM (2015) Final report: shallow groundwater intrinsic vulnerability mapping in Northeast British Columbia. Prepared for Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions and BC Ministry of forests. Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, p 41Google Scholar
  8. Johnson EG and LA Johnson (2012) Hydraulic fracture water usage in Northeast British Columbia: locations, volumes and trends. Geoscience reports 2012, British Columbia Ministry of energy and mines, pp 41–63Google Scholar
  9. Province of British Columbia (2015) Liquefied natural gas in British Columbia. https://lnginbc.gov.bc.ca/. Accessed July 2017Google Scholar
  10. Vengosh A, Jackson RB, Warner N, Darrah TH, Kondash A (2014) A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 48:8334–8348CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana M. Allen
    • 1
  • Shannon Holding
    • 1
  • Zachary McKoen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations