Advertisement

Urban Green Space in the Transition to the Eco-City: Policies, Multifunctionality and Narrative

  • Judy Bush
  • Dominique Hes
Chapter

Abstract

Urban green space provides multiple benefits to city dwellers—both human and non-human. These ‘nature-based solutions’ include mitigating urban heat and stormwater runoff, providing biodiversity habitat and contributing to human health and wellbeing, and social and cultural processes, which are key elements in creating ecological cities. In the transition to eco-cities, public policies for urban green space provision can make substantial contributions. However, in the transition from existing mono-functional, mechanistic policy approaches, there are challenges in creating a vision for urban green space that navigates beyond the splintered narratives of single-function priorities. This chapter investigates how urban green space policies in Melbourne, Australia address these challenges, and the roles that communication, engagement and narrative play.

Keywords

Urban green space Nature-based solutions Sustainability transitions Urban policies 

References

  1. Benedict, Mark A., and Edward T. McMahon. 2006. Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  2. Birkeland, Janis. 2008. Positive Development: From Vicious Circles to Virtuous Cycles Through Built Environment Design. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  3. Bosomworth, Karyn, Alexei Trundle, and Darryn McEvoy. 2013. Responding to the Urban Heat Island: A Policy and Institutional Analysis. Melbourne: Victorian Centre for Climate Change Adaptation Research.Google Scholar
  4. Clabby, G. 2016. Delivering Green Infrastructure Through Planning: Insights from Practice in Fingal, Ireland. Planning Theory and Practice 17 (2): 289–295.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen-Shacham, E., G. Walters, C. Janzen, and S. Maginnis. 2016. Nature-Based Solutions to Address Global Societal Challenges. Gland: IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colding, Johan. 2011. The Role of Ecosystem Services in Contemporary Urban Planning. In Urban Ecology: Patterns, Processes, and Applications, ed. Jari Niemelä, Jürgen H. Breuste, and Glenn Guntenspergen, 228–237. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CoM. 2012. Urban Forest Strategy. Making a Great City Greener. 2012–2032. Melbourne: City of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2017. Nature in the City. Thriving Biodiversity and Healthy Ecosystems. Melbourne: City of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  9. Davern, M., A. Farrar, D. Kendal, and B. Giles-Corti. 2017. Quality Green Public Open Space Supporting Health, Wellbeing and Biodiversity: A Literature Review. Report prepared for the Heart Foundation, SA Health, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Office for Recreation and Sport, and Local Government Association (SA). Victoria: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  10. Douglas, Ian, and Philip James. 2015. Urban Ecology: An Introduction. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. EC. 2015. Nature-Based Solutions and Re-Naturing Cities. Final report of the Horizon 2020 Expert Group, Edited by European Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission.Google Scholar
  12. Elmqvist, Thomas, Michail Fragkias, Julie Goodness, Burak Güneralp, Peter J. Marcotullio, Robert I. McDonald, Susan Parnell, Maria Schewenius, Marte Sendstad, Karen C. Seto, Cathy Wilkinson, Marina Alberti, Carl Folke, Niki Frantzeskaki, Dagmar Haase, Madhusudan Katti, Harini Nagendra, Jari Niemelä, Steward T.A. Pickett, Charles L. Redman, and Keith Tidball. 2013. Stewardship of the Biosphere in the Urban Era. In Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. A Global Assessment, ed. Thomas Elmqvist, Michail Fragkias, Julie Goodness, Burak Güneralp, Peter J. Marcotullio, Robert I. McDonald, Susan Parnell, Maria Schewenius, Marte Sendstad, Karen C. Seto, and Cathy Wilkinson, 719–746. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Fainstein, Susan S., and James DeFilippis. 2016. Readings in Planning Theory. Chicester: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frantzeskaki, Niki, Derk Loorbach, and James Meadowcroft. 2012. Governing Societal Transitions to Sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development 15 (1–2): 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frantzeskaki, Niki, Julia Wittmayer, and Derk Loorbach. 2014. The Role of Partnerships in ‘Realising’ Urban Sustainability in Rotterdam’s City Ports Area, the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production 65: 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geels, Frank W. 2002. Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-Level Perspective and a Case-Study. Research Policy 31 (8–9): 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geels, Frank W., and Johan Schot. 2007. Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways. Research Policy 36 (3): 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gómez-Baggethun, Erik, Åsa Gren, David N. Barton, Johannes Langemeyer, Timon McPhearson, Patrick O’Farrell, Erik Andersson, Zoé Hamstead, and Peleg Kremer. 2013. Urban Ecosystem Services. In Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. A Global Assessment, ed. Thomas Elmqvist, Michail Fragkias, Julie Goodness, Burak Güneralp, Peter J. Marcotullio, Robert I. McDonald, Susan Parnell, Maria Schewenius, Marte Sendstad, Karen C. Seto, and Cathy Wilkinson, 175–251. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Grimm, Nancy B., Stanley H. Faeth, Nancy E. Golubiewski, Charles L. Redman, Wu Jianguo, Xuemei Bai, and John M. Briggs. 2008. Global Change and the Ecology of Cities. Science 319 (5864): 756–760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindholm, G. 2017. The Implementation of Green Infrastructure: Relating a General Concept to Context and Site. Sustainability (Switzerland) 9 (4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040610.
  21. Loorbach, Derk. 2010. Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework. Governance 23 (1): 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maddison, Sarah, and Richard Denniss. 2013. An Introduction to Australian Public Policy: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McPhearson, T., D. Haase, N. Kabisch, and Å. Gren. 2016a. Advancing Understanding of the Complex Nature of Urban Systems. Ecological Indicators 70: 566–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McPhearson, T., S.T.A. Pickett, N.B. Grimm, J. Niemelä, M. Alberti, T. Elmqvist, C. Weber, D. Haase, J. Breuste, and S. Qureshi. 2016b. Advancing Urban Ecology Toward a Science of Cities. BioScience 66 (3): 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MEA. 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mell, Ian C. 2012. Can You Tell a Green Field from a Cold Steel Rail? Examining the “Green” of Green Infrastructure Development. Local Environment 18 (2): 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.719019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2017. Green Infrastructure: Reflections on Past, Present and Future Praxis. Landscape Research 42 (2): 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1250875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MTPC. 1929. Plan of General Development. Edited by Metropolitan Town Planning Commission. Melbourne: Victorian Government, Metropolitan Town Planning Commission.Google Scholar
  29. Nesshöver, Carsten, Timo Assmuth, Katherine N. Irvine, Graciela M. Rusch, Kerry A. Waylen, Ben Delbaere, Dagmar Haase, Lawrence Jones-Walters, Hans Keune, Eszter Kovacs, Kinga Krauze, Mart Külvik, Freddy Rey, Jiska van Dijk, Odd Inge Vistad, Mark E. Wilkinson, and Heidi Wittmer. 2017. The Science, Policy and Practice of Nature-Based Solutions: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Science of the Total Environment 579: 1215–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Register, Richard. 2006. Ecocities: Rebuilding Cities in Balance with Nature. Revised ed. Gabriola, BC: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Rotmans, Jan, Rene Kemp, and Marjolein van Asselt. 2001. More Evolution than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy. Foresight 3 (1): 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trundle, A., and D. McEvoy. 2016. Urban Greening, Human Health, and Wellbeing. In The Routledge Handbook of Urbanization and Global Environmental Change, ed. Karen C. Seto, William Solecki, and Corrie Griffith, 276–292. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Turner, Tom. 2005. Garden History: Philosophy and Design 2000 BC–2000 AD. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  34. van den Bosch, M., and Å. Ode Sang. 2017. Urban Natural Environments as Nature-Based Solutions for Improved Public Health—A Systematic Review of Reviews. Environmental Research 158: 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wolfram, M., and N. Frantzeskaki. 2016. Cities and Systemic Change for Sustainability: Prevailing Epistemologies and an Emerging Research Agenda. Sustainability 8 (2): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020144. Google Scholar
  36. Xing, Y., P. Jones, and I. Donnison. 2017. Characterisation of Nature-Based Solutions for the Built Environment. Sustainability (Switzerland) 9 (1): 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judy Bush
    • 1
  • Dominique Hes
    • 1
  1. 1.Thrive Research Hub, Faculty of Architecture, Building and PlanningThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations