Advertisement

Innovation: Creativity as a Renewable Resource for the Eco-City

  • Tanja Beer
  • David Curtis
  • Julie Collins
Chapter

Abstract

Cities need new strategies for conservation and climate change resilience that engage global narrators, unite diverse perspectives and mobilise an increasingly despondent public. This chapter examines community arts as a potential resource for the eco-city, including how incorporating creative perspectives into sustainability communication can open up new ways of thinking about how cities are reimagined for an ecological paradigm. Community arts can provide a unique platform for empowering communities across natural, constructed, economic and cultural systems, thereby contributing to the public’s knowledge and care of their local environment. Using a participatory design and theatre-making project as a case study (The Bower Stage, Armidale, Australia, 2016), the chapter demonstrates how incorporating both creative and ecological perspectives can enrich environmental citizenship and connection for the eco-city.

Keywords

Ecoscenography Eco-theatre Community arts Participatory design Ecodrama Place-making 

References

  1. Abram, David. 1997. The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a more-than Human World. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  2. Alston, Adam. 2013. Audience Participation and Neoliberal Value: Risk, Agency and Responsibility in Immersive Theatre. Performance Research 18 (2): 128–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  4. Beder, Sharon. 1996. The Nature of Sustainable Development. Newham: Scribe Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Beer, Tanja. 2015. The Living Stage: A Case Study in Ecoscenography. Etudes 1 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2016a. Ecomaterialism in Scenography. Theatre and Performance Design 2 (1–2): 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2016b. Reimagining the Ruins of Scenography. ASAP/Journal (Association for the Study of the Arts of the Present) 1 (3): 487–511.Google Scholar
  8. Beer, Tanja, and Cristina Hernandez. 2017. Refugium WA: Crafting Connection Through Plant-Relating Arts-Science Experiences of Urban Ecology. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 5 (2): 30–43.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, Jill, and Saskia Beudel. 2014. Curating Sydney: Imagining the City’s Future. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bierbaum, Nena. 1991. Towards Ecological Sustainability. Bedford Park: Flinders University: Flinders Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bingham, Shawn Chandler, ed. 2012. The Art of Social Critique: Painting Mirrors of Social Life. Maryland: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  12. Boal, Auguste. 2000. Theater of the Oppressed. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  13. Capra, Fritjof. 1996. The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  14. Clayton, Anthony M.H., and Nicholas J. Radcliffe. 1996. Sustainability: A Systems Approach. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  15. Coffey, B., and G. Marston. 2013. How Neoliberalism and Ecological Modernization Shaped Environmental Policy in Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 15 (2): 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collins, Julie. in press. We All Stand on Sacred Ground: Promoting a Sustainable Land Ethic. Chapter 28. In Building Sustainability with the Arts: Proceedings of the 2nd National EcoArts Australis Conference, ed. David Curtis. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Collins, Julie, Tanja Beer, and Camille Dunsford. in press. Saving the Planet with Ecodrama: Transformational and Experiential Theatre within a Living Stage. Proceedings Restore, Revegetate, Regenerate Conference, University of New England, February 2017.Google Scholar
  18. Cunningham, Chris. 1994. A Philosophical Framework for Urban Planning: The Concept of Altruisitic Surplus. Paper presented at the P.A.P.E.R. Conference, University of New England, Armidale NSW, December 6.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1996. A Philosophical Framework for Urban Planning: The Concept of Altruistic Surplus. In Urban Habitat: The Environment of Tomorrow, ed. G.G. Van der Meulen and P.A. Erlekins, 86–96. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology.Google Scholar
  20. Curtis, David J. 2003. The Arts and Restoration: A Fertile Partnership? Ecological Management and Restoration 4 (3): 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. 2006. Mobilising Rural Communities to Achieve Environmental Sustainability Using the Arts. Agricultural Economics Review 17 (1): 15–25.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2007. Creating Inspiration: How Visual and Performing Arts Shape Environmental Behaviour. PhD Thesis, University of New England, p. 500.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2009. Creating Inspiration: The Role of the Arts in Creating Empathy for Ecological Restoration. Ecological Management and Restoration 10 (3): 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 2010. Plague and the Moonflower: A Regional Community Celebrates the Environment. Music and Arts in Action 3 (1): 65–85.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2011. Using the Arts to Raise Awareness, and Communicate Environmental Information in the Extension Context. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 17 (2): 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———., ed. 2017. Building Sustainability with the Arts: Proceedings of the 2nd National EcoArts Australis Conference. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Curtis, David J., Mark Howden, Fran Curtis, Ian McColm, Juliet Scrine, Thor Blomfield, Ian Reeve, and Tara Ryan. 2013. Drama and Environment: Joining Forces to Engage Children and Young People in Environmental Education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 29 (2): 182–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Curtis, David J., Nick Reid, and Ian Reeve. 2014. Towards Ecological Sustainability: Observations on the Role of the Arts. S.A.P.I.EN.S. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society 7 (1): 15.Google Scholar
  29. du Plessis, Chrisna. 2012. Towards a Regenerative Paradigm for the Built Environment. Building Research & Information 40 (1): 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. EcoArts Australis. 2017. http://www.ecoartsaustralis.org.au/ephemera/. Accessed March 29, 2017.
  31. Eisenberg, David, and Bill Reed. 2003. Regenerative Design: Toward the Re-Integration of Human Systems within Nature. Pittsburgh Papers: Presentations from the Greenbuild Conference.Google Scholar
  32. Evans, Eleri. 2014. How Green Is my Valley? The Art of Getting People in Wales to Care About Climate Change. Journal of Critical Realism 13 (3): 304–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fuad-Luke, Alastair. 2009. Design Activism: Beautiful Strangeness for a Sustainable World. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  34. Goldie, Jenny, B. Douglas, and B. Furnass. 2005. In Search of Sustainability. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Hawken, Paul, Amory B. Lovins, and Hunter Lovins. 1999. Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  36. Heras, María, and David J. Tàbara. 2016. Conservation Theatre: Mirroring Experiences and Performing Stories in Community Management of Natural Resources. Society & Natural Resources 29 (8): 948–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hes, Dominique, and Chrisna du Plessis. 2015. Designing for Hope: Pathways to Regenerative Sustainability. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  38. Hadorn, Gertrude Hirsch. 2008. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hofstra, Nynke, and Donald Huisingh. 2014. Eco-Innovations Characterized: A Taxonomic Classification of Relationships Between Humans and Nature. Journal of Cleaner Production 66: 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Irigaray, Luce, and Michael Marder. 2016. Through Vegetal Being: Two Philosophical Perspectives. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kagan, Sacha, and Volker Kirchberg, eds. 2008. Sustainability: A New Frontier for the Arts and Cultures. Waldkirchen: Verlag fur Akademische Schriften.Google Scholar
  42. Low, Nicholas, Brendon Gleeson, Ray Green, and Darko Radovic. 2005. The Green City: Sustainable Homes, Sustainable Suburbs. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
  43. Machon, Josephine. 2013. Immersive Theatres: Intimacy and Immediacy in Contemporary Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mang, Pamela, and Bill Reed. 2012. Designing from Place: A Regenerative Framework and Methodology. Building Research & Information 40 (1): 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. May, Theresa J. 2007. What is Ecodrama? Earth Matters on Stage. http://pages.uoregon.edu/ecodrama/whatis/.
  46. ———. 2013. Indigenous Theatre in Global Times: Situated Knowledge and Ecological Communities in Salmon Is Everything and Burning Vision. In Performance on Behalf of the Environment, ed. Richard D. Besel and Jnan A. Blau, 193. Lanham, MD: Lexing-ton books.Google Scholar
  47. Merchant, Carolyn. 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  48. Pye, Elizabeth, ed. 2016. The Power of Touch: Handling Objects in Museum and Heritage Context. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Rees, William E. 1995. Achieving Sustainability: Reform or Transformation? Journal of Planning Literature 9 (4): 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robinson, John, and Raymond J. Cole. 2015. Theoretical Underpinnings of Regenerative Sustainability. Building Research & Information 43 (2): 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schumacher, Ernst Friedrich. 1973. Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London: Blond and Briggs.Google Scholar
  52. Somerville, Margaret, and Monica Green. 2015. Children, Place and Sustainability. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stevenson, Richard J. 2014. The Forgotten Sense: Using Olfaction in a Museum Context: A Neuroscience Approach. In The Multisensory Museum: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Touch, Sound, Smell, Memory, and Space, ed. Ninna Levent and Alvaro Pascual-Leone, 151–166. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  54. Sullivan, Regina M., David A. Wilson, Nadine Ravel, and Anne-Marie Mouly. 2015. Olfactory Memory Networks: From Emotional Learning to Social Behaviors. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 9: 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tashakkori, Abbas, and Charles Teddlie. 1998. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Thomsen, Dana C. 2015. Seeing Is Questioning: Prompting Sustainability Discourses Through an Evocative Visual Agenda. Ecology & Society 20 (4): 242–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Toyne, Phillip. 1994. The Reluctant Nation. Sydney: ABC Books.Google Scholar
  58. Zak, Paul J. 2015, January. Why Inspiring Stories Make us React: The Neuroscience of Narrative. Cerebrum: The Dana Forum on Brain Science 2015, Dana Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tanja Beer
    • 1
  • David Curtis
    • 2
  • Julie Collins
    • 3
  1. 1.Thrive Research Hub, Faculty of Architecture, Building and PlanningThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Institute of Rural FuturesUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  3. 3.School of HumanitiesUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations