Advertisement

Lessons Learned from SATREPS Projects and Perspectives

  • Shuichi Asanuma
  • Makie Kokubun
Chapter

Abstract

Cutting-edge science and technology such as genome analysis is a useful technology in genomic characterization of living organisms, biological diversity analysis, breeding, and any other genome-related science. In this chapter, we tried to find how the cutting-edge science and technology was utilized in solving the global-scale problems in developing countries, particularly in research for development fields using bioresources. For this purpose, we examined the effectiveness of cutting-edge technologies in addressing the issues challenged by the nine projects reported in Chaps.  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9, and  10 of this book. In any case, the state-of-the-art technologies were found to be effective only when conventional technologies were applied complementarily. For example, the genome analysis using next-generation sequencer was found to be a very useful technology in identifying the traits of genetic materials in the research of plant breeding. However, to solve the problems and apply the results for development, breeding materials needed to be tested in the process of selection of promising materials toward new varieties-candidates under the field conditions whether they adapt to the real conditions through G (genetic traits) × E (environmental conditions) × M (management such as fertilization and water control) experiments. Many projects reported herewith showed that conventional technologies were also used and useful in those experiments. Therefore, we conclude that both cutting-edge and conventional technologies are required in a harmonious manner in solving the problems and applying the results for development in developing countries. At the same time, capacity building of researchers is essential to obtain new knowledge for understanding the problems and new technologies to solve the problems.

References

  1. Atera EA (2010) Effect of Striga infection on NERICA rice cultivars and farmers’ perception on its control mechanisms in sub-Saharan Africa, M.Sc. thesis, Kobe University, JapanGoogle Scholar
  2. Gaydon DS, Probert ME, Buresh RJ et al (2012) Rice in cropping systems – Modelling transitions between flooded and non-flooded soil environments. Eur J Agron 39:9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Keating BA, Carberry PS, Hammer GL et al (2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. Eur J Agron 18:267–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kgosi RL, Zwanenburg B, Mwakaboko AS, Murdoch AJ (2012) Strigolactone analogues induce suicidal seed germination of Striga spp. in soil. Weed Res 52(3):197–203.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2012.00912.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Neuenschwander P (2001) Biological control of the cassava mealybug in Africa: a review. Biol Control 21(3):214–229.  https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.2001.0937 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2011) Nagoya protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization to the convention on biological diversity: text and annex.Google Scholar
  7. Yoshida S (1981) Fundamentals of rice crop science. International Rice Research Institute, New Delhi, p 269Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Tohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations