Abstract
Co-composting of municipal solid waste with that of industrial solids is gaining importance nowadays due to the possibility of the disposal of both the waste simultaneously in an eco-friendly manner as soil-enhancer for nutrient hungry soils. This study focuses on the suitability of co-composting organic part of municipal solid waste (OPMSW) generated from Coimbatore city with industrial solids from pulp and paper (P), sugar (S) and dairy (D) industries in three different proportions, i.e. 3:1, 6:1 and 9:1 designated as 1, 2 and 3, respectively, and subjecting to three different composting techniques like windrow composting (W), vermicomposting (V) and twin process (Windrow + Vermicomposting, WV). The phytotoxicity of the finished compost in each case, i.e. from nine different combinations for each industrial solid, has been analysed in terms of germination index (GI) and vigour index (VI using Lycopersicum esculentum (Tomato plant—test species recommended by USEPA/FD). In the group P–P3, WV showed highest GI (62) and VI (764); in group S–S3, WV showed highest GI (55) and VI (703); and in group D–D2, WV showed highest GI (57) and VI (743) than their corresponding counterparts. This shows that the twin process (WV) to be an ideal method for treatment of OPMSW with the sludge from various industries due to its short duration of processing (40 days) and better quality of the final compost than their counterparts with respect to phytotoxicity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdul-Baki, A. A., & Anderson, J. D. (1973). Vigour determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Science, 13, 630–633.
Albanell, E., Plaixats, J., & Cabrero, T. (1988). Chemical changes during vermicomposting of sheep manure mixed with cotton industrial wastes. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 6(3), 266–269.
Aparna, C., Saritha, P., Himabindu, V., & Anjaneyulu, Y. (2007). Techniques for the evaluation of maturity for composts. Waste Management, 28(10), 1773–1784.
Bansal, S., & Kapoor, K. (2000). Vermicomposting of crop residues and cattle dung with Eisenia foetida. Bioresource Technology, 73, 95–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00173-X.
Bhardwaj, K. K. R. (1995). Recycling of crop residues oilcakes and other plant products in agriculture. In H. L. S. Tandon (Ed.), Recycling of crop, animal, human and industrial wastes in agriculture (pp. 9–30). New Delhi: Fertilizer Development and Consultation Organization.
Brinton, W. F., & Trankner, A. (1999). Compost maturity as expressed by phytotoxicity and volatile organic acids. In ORBIT-99 Conference Proceedings. Germany: University of Bauhaus Weimar.
Chen, M., Piao, Xu, Guangming, Z., Chupping, Y., Danlian, H., & Jiachao, Z. (2015). Bioremediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, petroleum, pesticides, chlorophenols and heavy metals by composting: Applications, microbes and future research needs. Biotechnology Advances, 33(6), 745–755.
Contreras-Ramos, S. M., Escamilla-Silva, E. M., & Dendooven, L. (2004). Vermicomposting of biosolids with cow manure and oat straw. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 41(3), 190–198.
Fagnano, M., Adamo, P., Zampella, M., & Fiorentino, N. (2011). Environmental and agronomic impact of fertilization with composted organic part from municipal solid waste: A case study in the region of Naples, Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 141(1), 100–107.
Fletcher, J. (1991). A brief overview of plant toxicity testing. In Plants For Toxicity Assessment. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM, ASTM Publication Code Number (PCN) 04-011150-16.
Krigstin, S., & Sain, M. (2006). Characterization and potential utilization of recycled paper mill sludge. Pulp Paper Canada, 107(5), 29–32.
Lakshmipriya, T., Uma, R. N., Sivakumar, S., Meenambal, T., & Son, H. K. (2012). Bioremediation of pulp and paper industry secondary sludge spiked with cowdung and effective microorganisms using epigeic earthworms Eudrilus euginae (Kinberg). Dynamic soil Dynamic plant, 6(1), 78–82.
Mathur, S. P., Dinel, H., Owen, G., Schnitzer, M., & Durgan, J. (1993). Determination of compost maturity: I literature review. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture, 10, 65–86.
Mishra, M. M., Kukreja, K., Kapoor, K. K., Bangar, K. C. (1989). Organic recycling for plant nutrients. In L. L. Somani, & C. S. Bhandari (Eds.), Soil microorganisms and crop growth (pp. 195–232). Jodhpur: Divyajyoti Parkashan.
Saavedra, M., Benitez, C., Cifuentes, C., & Nogales, R. (2006). Enzyme activities and chemical changes in wet olive cake after treatment with Pleurotus ostreatus or Eisenia fetida. Biodegradation, 17, 93–102.
Saludes, R. B., Iwabuchi, K., Miyatake, F. et al. (2008). Characterization of dairy cattle manure/wallboard paper compost mixture. Bioresource Technology, 99, 7285–7290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2007.12.080.
Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Mahmood, G., & Trivedi, R. C. (2008). Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities–A review. Waste Management, 28(2), 459–467.
Tiquia, M., & Tam, N. F. Y. (1998). Elimination of phytotoxicity during Co-composting of spent pig-manure sawdust litter and pig sludge. Bioresource Technology, 65, 43–49.
Zucconi, F., & de Bertoldi. (1987). Compost specification for the production and characterization of compost from municipal solid waste. In: M., De Bertoldi, M. P., Ferrranti, P., L’Hermite, F. Zucconi (Eds.), Compost: Production, Quality and use. Essex: Elsevier.
Zucconi, F., Forte, M., Monaco, A., & De Bertoldi, M. (1981). Biological evaluation of compost maturity. BioCycle, 22(4), 27–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lakshmi Priya, T., Meenambal, T., Jeyanthi, J., Ravikannan, S.P., Swathi, S. (2019). Assessment of Phytotoxicity in the Compost Derived Through Different Techniques from Municipal Solid Waste and Industrial Solids. In: Ghosh, S. (eds) Waste Management and Resource Efficiency. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7290-1_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7290-1_44
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7289-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7290-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)