Skip to main content

Assessment of Phytotoxicity in the Compost Derived Through Different Techniques from Municipal Solid Waste and Industrial Solids

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Waste Management and Resource Efficiency

Abstract

Co-composting of municipal solid waste with that of industrial solids is gaining importance nowadays due to the possibility of the disposal of both the waste simultaneously in an eco-friendly manner as soil-enhancer for nutrient hungry soils. This study focuses on the suitability of co-composting organic part of municipal solid waste (OPMSW) generated from Coimbatore city with industrial solids from pulp and paper (P), sugar (S) and dairy (D) industries in three different proportions, i.e. 3:1, 6:1 and 9:1 designated as 1, 2 and 3, respectively, and subjecting to three different composting techniques like windrow composting (W), vermicomposting (V) and twin process (Windrow + Vermicomposting, WV). The phytotoxicity of the finished compost in each case, i.e. from nine different combinations for each industrial solid, has been analysed in terms of germination index (GI) and vigour index (VI using Lycopersicum esculentum (Tomato plant—test species recommended by USEPA/FD). In the group P–P3, WV showed highest GI (62) and VI (764); in group S–S3, WV showed highest GI (55) and VI (703); and in group D–D2, WV showed highest GI (57) and VI (743) than their corresponding counterparts. This shows that the twin process (WV) to be an ideal method for treatment of OPMSW with the sludge from various industries due to its short duration of processing (40 days) and better quality of the final compost than their counterparts with respect to phytotoxicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdul-Baki, A. A., & Anderson, J. D. (1973). Vigour determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Science, 13, 630–633.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Albanell, E., Plaixats, J., & Cabrero, T. (1988). Chemical changes during vermicomposting of sheep manure mixed with cotton industrial wastes. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 6(3), 266–269.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aparna, C., Saritha, P., Himabindu, V., & Anjaneyulu, Y. (2007). Techniques for the evaluation of maturity for composts. Waste Management, 28(10), 1773–1784.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bansal, S., & Kapoor, K. (2000). Vermicomposting of crop residues and cattle dung with Eisenia foetida. Bioresource Technology, 73, 95–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00173-X.

  5. Bhardwaj, K. K. R. (1995). Recycling of crop residues oilcakes and other plant products in agriculture. In H. L. S. Tandon (Ed.), Recycling of crop, animal, human and industrial wastes in agriculture (pp. 9–30). New Delhi: Fertilizer Development and Consultation Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brinton, W. F., & Trankner, A. (1999). Compost maturity as expressed by phytotoxicity and volatile organic acids. In ORBIT-99 Conference Proceedings. Germany: University of Bauhaus Weimar.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, M., Piao, Xu, Guangming, Z., Chupping, Y., Danlian, H., & Jiachao, Z. (2015). Bioremediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, petroleum, pesticides, chlorophenols and heavy metals by composting: Applications, microbes and future research needs. Biotechnology Advances, 33(6), 745–755.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Contreras-Ramos, S. M., Escamilla-Silva, E. M., & Dendooven, L. (2004). Vermicomposting of biosolids with cow manure and oat straw. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 41(3), 190–198.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fagnano, M., Adamo, P., Zampella, M., & Fiorentino, N. (2011). Environmental and agronomic impact of fertilization with composted organic part from municipal solid waste: A case study in the region of Naples, Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 141(1), 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fletcher, J. (1991). A brief overview of plant toxicity testing. In Plants For Toxicity Assessment. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM, ASTM Publication Code Number (PCN) 04-011150-16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krigstin, S., & Sain, M. (2006). Characterization and potential utilization of recycled paper mill sludge. Pulp Paper Canada, 107(5), 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lakshmipriya, T., Uma, R. N., Sivakumar, S., Meenambal, T., & Son, H. K. (2012). Bioremediation of pulp and paper industry secondary sludge spiked with cowdung and effective microorganisms using epigeic earthworms Eudrilus euginae (Kinberg). Dynamic soil Dynamic plant, 6(1), 78–82.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mathur, S. P., Dinel, H., Owen, G., Schnitzer, M., & Durgan, J. (1993). Determination of compost maturity: I literature review. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture, 10, 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mishra, M. M., Kukreja, K., Kapoor, K. K., Bangar, K. C. (1989). Organic recycling for plant nutrients. In L. L. Somani, & C. S. Bhandari (Eds.), Soil microorganisms and crop growth (pp. 195–232). Jodhpur: Divyajyoti Parkashan.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saavedra, M., Benitez, C., Cifuentes, C., & Nogales, R. (2006). Enzyme activities and chemical changes in wet olive cake after treatment with Pleurotus ostreatus or Eisenia fetida. Biodegradation, 17, 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saludes, R. B., Iwabuchi, K., Miyatake, F. et al. (2008). Characterization of dairy cattle manure/wallboard paper compost mixture. Bioresource Technology, 99, 7285–7290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2007.12.080.

  17. Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Mahmood, G., & Trivedi, R. C. (2008). Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities–A review. Waste Management, 28(2), 459–467.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tiquia, M., & Tam, N. F. Y. (1998). Elimination of phytotoxicity during Co-composting of spent pig-manure sawdust litter and pig sludge. Bioresource Technology, 65, 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zucconi, F., & de Bertoldi. (1987). Compost specification for the production and characterization of compost from municipal solid waste. In: M., De Bertoldi, M. P., Ferrranti, P., L’Hermite, F. Zucconi (Eds.), Compost: Production, Quality and use. Essex: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zucconi, F., Forte, M., Monaco, A., & De Bertoldi, M. (1981). Biological evaluation of compost maturity. BioCycle, 22(4), 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Lakshmi Priya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lakshmi Priya, T., Meenambal, T., Jeyanthi, J., Ravikannan, S.P., Swathi, S. (2019). Assessment of Phytotoxicity in the Compost Derived Through Different Techniques from Municipal Solid Waste and Industrial Solids. In: Ghosh, S. (eds) Waste Management and Resource Efficiency. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7290-1_44

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics