Domino Effect in Information Cascade

  • Shintaro Mori
  • Masato Hisakado
Part of the Agent-Based Social Systems book series (ABSS, volume 14)


When individuals with private information make sequential decisions after having observed the actions of those ahead of them, the actions of early individuals can influence the behaviors of later individuals. Information cascade is a phenomenon where later individuals follow the majority’s behaviors of the early individuals without regard to their own private information. As the first individual’s choice greatly affects the majority’s choice, it can propagate along the subjects sequence. The question is when and how the domino effect propagates forever. In this chapter, we study several simple models of information cascade and address the question. The memory length in the sequential decisions and the number of stable state (equilibrium) play the key role. Understanding the results can help readers to understand the micro-macro features of the information cascade experiments and the betting behaviors in a horse race betting market in later chapters.


  1. Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural changes as informational cascades. J Polit Econ 100:992–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Devenow A, Welch I (1996) Rational herding in nancial economics. Euro Econ Rev 40:603–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hill B, Lane D, Sudderth W (1980) A strong law for some generalized urn processes. Ann Probab 8:214–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hisakado M, Mori S (2010) Phase transition and information cascade in voting model. J Phys A Math Theor 43:315207–315219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hisakado M, Mori S (2011) Digital Herders and phase transition in a voting model. J Phys A Math Theor 44:275204–275220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mori S, Hisakado M (2015a) Finite-size scaling analysis of binary stochastic processes and universality classes of information cascade phase transition. J Phys Soc Jpn 84:054001–054013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mori S, Hisakado M (2015b) Correlation function for generalized Pólya urns: finite-size scaling analysis. Phys Rev E92:052112–052121Google Scholar
  8. Pemantle R (1991) When are touchpoints limits for generalized Pólya urns? Proc Am Math Soc 113:235–243Google Scholar
  9. Pemantle R (2007) A survey of random processes with reinforcement. Pobab Surv 4:1–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pólya G (1931) Sur quelques points de la théorie des probabilités. Ann Inst Henri Poincar 1:117–161Google Scholar
  11. Rendell L, Boyd R, Cownden D, Enquist M, Eriksson K, Feldman MW, Fogarty L, Ghirlanda S, Lillicrap T, Laland KN (2010) Why copy others? Insights from the social learning strategies tornament. Science 328:208–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stanley HE (1971) Introduction to phase transitions and critical phenomena. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shintaro Mori
    • 1
  • Masato Hisakado
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Mathematics and PhysicsHirosaki UniversityHirosakiJapan
  2. 2.Nomura Holdings, Inc.Chiyoda-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations