Advertisement

Information Cascade and Phase Transition

  • Masato Hisakado
  • Shintaro Mori
Chapter
Part of the Agent-Based Social Systems book series (ABSS, volume 14)

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss a voting model with two candidates. We set two types of voters – herders and independents. The voting of independent voters is based on their fundamental values; on the other hand, the voting of herders is based on the number of votes. Herders always select the majority of the previous r votes, which is visible to them. We call them digital herders. As the fraction of herders increases, the model features a phase transition beyond which a state where most voters make the correct choice coexists with one where most of them are wrong. Here we obtain the exact solutions of the model. The main contents of this chapter are based on Hisakado and Mori (J Phys A 22:275204, 2011).

References

  1. Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of Fads, fashion, custom, and cultural changes as information cascades. J Polit Econ 100:992–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Böhm W (2000) The correlated random walk with boundaries: a combinatorial solution. J Appl Prob 37:470–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Curty P, Marsili M (2006) Phase coexistence in a forecasting game. JSTAT P03013Google Scholar
  4. Cont R, Bouchaud J (2000) Herd behavior and aggregate fluctuations in financial markets. Macroecon Dyn 4:170–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Francesco P, Golinelli O, Guitter E (1997) Meander, folding, and arch statistics. Math Comput Model 26(8):97–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dorigo M, Stützle T (2004) Ant colony optimization. MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eguíluz V, Zimmermann M (2000) Transmission of information and herd behavior: an application to financial markets. Phys Rev Lett 85:5659–5662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galam G (1990) Social paradoxes of majority rule voting and renormalization group. Stat Phys 61:943–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hisakado M, Hino M (2016) Between ant colony optimization and generic algorithm. J IPS Jpn 9(3):8–14 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  10. Hisakado M, Mori S (2010) Phase transition and information cascade in a voting model. J Phys A 43:315207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hisakado M, Mori S (2011) Digital herders and phase transition in a voting model. J Phys A 22:275204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hisakado M, Kitsukawa K, Mori S (2006) Correlated binomial models and correlated structure. J. Phys. A. 39:15365–15378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keynes JM (1936) General theory of employment interest and money. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Konno N (2002) Limit theorems and absorption problems for quantum random walks in one dimension. Quantum Inf Comput 2:578–595Google Scholar
  15. Lang W (2000) On polynominals related to power of the generating function of Catalan’s numbers. Fib Quart 38:408Google Scholar
  16. Mori S, Hisakado M (2010) Exact scale invariance in mixing of binary candidates in voting. J Phys Soc Jpn 79:034001–034008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stauffer D (2002) Sociophysics: the Sznajd model and its applications. Comput Phys Commun 146(1):93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masato Hisakado
    • 1
  • Shintaro Mori
    • 2
  1. 1.Nomura Holdings, Inc.Chiyoda-kuJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Mathematics and PhysicsHirosaki UniversityHirosakiJapan

Personalised recommendations