Advertisement

Semi-active Inerter and Adaptive Tuned Vibration Absorber

  • Michael Z. Q. ChenEmail author
  • Yinlong Hu
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents a novel framework to realize the semi-active inerter, and proposes a novel semi-active-inerter-based adaptive tuned vibration absorber (SIATVA). The proposed semi-active inerter can be realized by replacing the fixed-inertia flywheel in the existing flywheel-based inerters with a controllable-inertia flywheel (CIF). Then, by using the proposed semi-active inerter, a SIATVA is constructed, and two control methods, that is the frequency-tracker-based (FT) control and the phase-detector-based (PD) control, are derived. The experimental results show that both the FT control and the PD control can effectively neutralize the vibration of the primary mass, although the excitation frequency may vary. The proposed SIATVA can also tolerate the parameter variation of the primary system. As a result, it can be applied to a variety of primary systems without resetting the parameters. The performance degradation by the inherent damping is also demonstrated.

Keywords

Semi-active inerter Adaptive tuned vibration absorber Controllable-inertia flywheel Physical embodiments Experiments 

References

  1. Bonello, P. (2011). Adaptive tuned vibration absorbers: Design principles. In F. Beltran-Carbajal (Ed.), concepts and physical implementation, in Vibration Analysis and Control-New Trends and Developments (pp. 1–26). Croatia: InTech.Google Scholar
  2. Brennan, M. J. (2006). Some recent developments in adaptive tuned vibration absorbers/neutralisers. Shock and Vibration, 13, 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brzeski, P., Kapitaniak, T., & Perlikowski, P. (2015). Novel type of tuned mass damper with inerter which enables changes of inertance. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 349(2015), 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, M. Z. Q., Papageorgiou, C., Scheibe, F., Wang, F. C., & Smith, M. C. (2009). The missing mechanical circuit element. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, 9(1), 10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, M. Z. Q., Hu, Y., Li, C., & Chen, G. (2014). Semi-active suspension with semi-active inerter and semi-active damper, Proceedings of the 19th IFAC World Congress (pp. 11225–11230). South Africa: Cape Town.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, C., & Lesieutre, G. A. (1999). An actively tuned solid-state vibration absorber using capacitive shunting of piezoelectric stiffness. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 232(3), 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Den Hartog, J. P. (1985). Mechanical vibrations. New York, USA: Dover Publications Inc.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedman, V. (1994). A zero crossing algorithm for the estimation of the frequency of a single sinusoid in white noise. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 42(6), 1565–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gartner, B. J., & Smith, M. C. (2011). Damper and inertial hydraulic device, U.S. Patent 13/577, 234.Google Scholar
  10. Hu, Y., Chen, M. Z. Q, Xu, S., & Liu, Y. (2017). Semiactive inerter and its application in adaptive tuned vibration absorbers. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 25(1), 294–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jayender, J., Patel, R. V., Nikumb, S., & Ostojic, M. (2008). Modeling and control of shape memory alloy actuators. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 16(2), 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, P., Lam, J., & Cheung, K.-C. (2014). Investigation on semi-active control of vehicle suspension using adaptive inerter. The 21st International Congress on Sound and Vibration, 13–17 July 204, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  13. Li, P., Lam, J., & Cheung, K.-C. (2015). Control of vehicle suspension using an adaptive inerter. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 229(14), 1934–1943.Google Scholar
  14. Partovibakhsh, M., & Liu, G. (2014). An adaptive Unscented Kalman Filtering approach for online estimation of model parameters and state-of-charge of lithium-ion batteries for autonomous mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 23(1), 357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith, M. C. (2002). Synthesis of mechanical networks: The inerter. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 47(1), 1648–1662.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schumacher, L. L. (1991). Controllable inertia flywheel, U.S. Patent 4,995,282.Google Scholar
  17. Tuluie, R. (2010). Fluid Inerter, U.S. Patent 13/575, 017.Google Scholar
  18. Tsai, M.-C., & Huang, C.-C. (2011). Development of a variable-inertia device with a magnetic planetary Ggearbox. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 16(6), 1120–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang, F.-C., & Su, W.-J. (2008). Impact of inerter nonlinearities on vehicle suspension control. Vehicle System Dynamics, 46(7), 575–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang, F.-C., Hong, M. F., & Lin, T. C. (2011). Designing and testing a hydraulic inerter. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 225(1), 66–72.Google Scholar
  21. Zhang, X., Ahmadian, M., & Guo, K. (2010). A comparison of a semi-active inerter and a semi-active suspension. SAE Technical Paper, 2010-01-1903,  https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-1903.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Science Press, Beijing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of AutomationNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  2. 2.College of Energy and Electrical EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations