Time Factor, Technological Development, Evolutive Interpretation and the Possible Codification

  • Chang-fa LoEmail author


Time factor and the evolutive interpretation are not included in the current treaty interpretation rules. This chapter suggests that the evolutive interpretation should be used when certain requirements are met so as not to make a treaty become obsolete. This chapter also discusses that technology development and the technological neutrality are factors to help decide the use of an evolutive interpretation.


  1. Ali R (2009) Technological neutrality. Lex Electronica 14(2):1–15Google Scholar
  2. Editorial. EBU Tech Rev 312 (Oct 2007). Accessed 21 Aug 2017
  3. ICT Regulation Toolkit. Accessed 21 Aug 2017
  4. Larouche P (2004) Dealing with convergence at the international level. In: Geradin D, Luff D (eds) The WTO and global convergence in telecommunications and audio-visual service. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 390–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lee KYR Expansive interpretation of the European convention on human rights and the creative Jurisprudence of the Strasbourg’s Court. Mercury—HKU J Undergrad Humanit 1(1):70–82. Accessed 21 Aug 2017
  6. Pauwelyn J The nature of WTO obligations. Accessed 21 Aug 2017
  7. Peng S (2012) Renegotiate the WTO “Schedule of Commitments”? Technological Development and Treaty Interpretation, Cornell Intl Law J, 45: 403–430Google Scholar
  8. Reed C (2007) Taking sides on technology neutrality. SCRIPT-ed—J Law Technol Soc 4(3):263–284. Accessed 21 Aug 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. The Hague Justice Portal. ICJ Judgment in Costa Rica v. Nicaragua. Accessed 21 Aug 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Judicial YuanConstitutional CourtTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations