Advertisement

Accelerometer Artefacts from Body-Worn Sensors

  • Elle McDonough
  • Christopher W. Hinton-Lewis
  • Hugo G. Espinosa
  • David V. Thiel
Conference paper

Abstract

Inertial sensors are commonly found in commercial products such as smartphones and sports bands. When these sensors are stationary, the variation in the recorded signal (noise level) is very small (approaching 0.1% of the gravitational acceleration). In many sports applications, the recorded acceleration has noise spikes related to the sensor itself and impulsive body movements. The wrist acceleration (100 samples/s) from a boxing jab (posterior–anterior) to a stationary bag using five subjects demonstrated that following the impact, the sensor oscillated in a manner dependent on the sensor weight. Mathematically, the integrated acceleration at the end point of the jab should be zero. This was used to remove the vibration artefacts and verified using a high-speed camera (2014 fps). A male participant with a rotator cuff shoulder reconstruction was asked to raise his arms (front lateral raise) individually from rest (vertical) to above the horizontal position carrying several different weights. The shoulder instability of the participant was evident in the accelerometer record as significantly larger anterior–posterior vibration at 9 Hz. This was not evident in the opposite shoulder which had no reported injury. This technique might prove a useful tool in quantifying shoulder instability over long periods of time.

Keywords

Inertial sensors Accelerometers Boxing jab Shoulder stability Noise 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the participants for their assistance and involvement in the project. Thanks also to Ray Leadbetter from Sabel labs for assistance with the instrumentation.

References

  1. 1.
    Cleland, I., Nugent, C. D., Finlay, D. D., Burns, W. P., Bougourd, J., Stevens, K., et al. (2012). Effects of accelerometer coupling on step counting accuracy in healthy older adults. Health Technology, 2, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thiel, D. V., Quandt, J., Carter, S. J. L., & Moyle, G. (2014). Accelerometer based performance assessment of basic routines in classical ballet. Procedia Engineering, 72, 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stabb, W., Hottowitz, R., & Sohns, C. M. D. (2014). Sohns, J.M.MD., Gilbert, F.MD., Menke, J.MD., Niklas, A.MD., and Lotz, J.MD., “Accelerometer and gyroscope based gait analysis using spectral analysis of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee”, Journal of Physical Thera py. Science, 26, 997–1002.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, K., Liu, T., Shibata, K., Inoue, Y., & Zheng, R. (2009). Novel approach to ambulatory assessment of human segmental orientation on a wearable sensor system. Journal of Biomechanics, 42, 2747–2752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wakeling, J. M., & Nigg, B. M. (2001). Soft-tissue vibrations in the quadriceps measured with skin mounted transducers. Journal of Biomechanics, 34, 539–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fratini, A., Cesarelli, M., Bifulco, P., & Romano, R. (2009). Relevance of motion artefact in electromyography recordings during vibration treatment. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 19, 710–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kimm, D, & Thiel, D. V. (2015). Hand speed measurements in boxing. Procedia Engineering, 112, 502–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Espinosa, H. G., Lee, J., & James, D. A. (2015). The inertial sensor: A base platform for wider adoption in sports science applications. Journal of Fitness Research, 4, 13–20.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thiel, D. V., Espinosa, H., Davis, G. M., Dylke, E., Foroughi, N., amd Kilbreath, L. (2013). Arm movement: The effect of obesity on a ctive lifestyles. Procedia Engineering, 60, 182–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chuang, T.-Y., Adams, C. R., & Burkhart, S. S. (2008). Use of preoperative three-dimensional computers tomography to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 24, 376–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burkhart, S. S., DeBeer, J. F., Tehrany, A. M., & Parten, P. M. (2002). Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscope and Related Surgery, 18, 488–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., & Carr, A. (1999). The assement of shoulder instability: The development and validation of a questionaire. The Bone and Joint Journal, 81-B, 420–426.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kirkley, A., Griffin, S., McLintock, H., & Ng, L. (1998). The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 26, 764–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Espinosa, H. G., McDonough, E., & Thiel, D. V. (2016). Non-traumatic shoulder instability measurements from accelerometer and audio records. Journal of Fitness Research, 5, 11–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elle McDonough
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Christopher W. Hinton-Lewis
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hugo G. Espinosa
    • 1
    • 2
  • David V. Thiel
    • 1
  1. 1.EngineeringGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of EngineeringGriffith UniversityQueenslandAustralia
  3. 3.Sports and Exercise Science, Leeds UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations