Advertisement

An Enigma: Barriers to the Identification of Students Who Are Gifted with a Learning Disability

  • Catherine WormaldEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses research that sought to understand the barriers to the identification of students who are gifted with a learning disability (GLD). These students are an enigma within schools and are under-represented in programmes for gifted students. A mixed method of research was used for this research, consisting of two phases that ran concurrently. In Phase 1, teachers from a Sydney Education area were surveyed. In addition, eight of the teachers were interviewed. For Phase 2, multiple case studies were undertaken. The participants were students who were identified as GLD, their families and the professionals they had consulted. The results showed that an identification protocol is needed, as well as teacher training and support from decision makers across all sectors of education. The teachers demonstrated some knowledge with regard to these students but also confusion and conflict with respect to their educational needs.

References

  1. Assouline, S. G., Foley-Nicpon, M., & Whitman, C. (2010). Cognitive and psychosocial characteristics of gifted students with written language disability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 102–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assouline, S. G., & Whiteman, C. (2011). Twice-exceptionality: implications for school psychologist in the post-IDEA 2004 era. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27, 380–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2011.616576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton, J. M., & Starnes, W. T. (1989). Identifying distinguishing characteristics of gifted and talented learning disabled students. Roeper Review, 12(1), 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum, S. (1988). An enrichment program for gifted learning disabled students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(1), 226–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum, S., Cooper, C. R., & Neu, T. W. (2001). Dual differentiation: an approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38(5), 477–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baum, S., & Owen, S. V. (1988). High ability learning disabled students: how are they different? Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(3), 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baum, S., Owen, S. V., & Dixon, J. (1991). To be gifted and learning disabled: from identification to practical intervention strategies. Melbourne: Hawker Brownlow Education.Google Scholar
  8. Bees, C. (1998). The GOLD program: a program for gifted learning disabled adolescents. Roeper Review, 21(2), 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berninger, V. W., & Abbot, R. D. (2013). Differences between children with dyslexia who are and are not gifted in verbal reasoning. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 223–233. doi: https://doi.org/10:1177/--16986213500342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bisland, A. (2004). Using learning-strategies instruction with students who are gifted and learning disabled. Gifted Child Today, 27(3), 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boodoo, G. M., Bradley, C. L., Frontera, R. L., Pitts, J. R., & Wright, L. B. (1989). A survey of procedures used for identifying gifted learning disabled children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33(3), 110–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brody, L. E., & Mills, C. J. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: a review of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(3), 282–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coutinho, M. J., & Oswald, P. (2005). State variation in gender disproportionality in special education: findings and recommendations. Remedial and Special Education Austin, 16(1), 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crim, C., Hawkins, J., Ruban, L., & Johnson, S. (2008). Curricular modifications for elementary students with learning disabilities in high-, average-, and low-IQ groups. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22, 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Disability Discrimination Act (DDA). (1992). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.au/series/c2004a04426
  16. Foley-Nicpon, M. (2013). Progress in the path of understanding. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 207–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foley-Nicpon, M., Allmon, A., Sieck, B., & Stinson, R. D. (2011). Empirical investigation of twice exceptionality: where have we been and where are we going? Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gagné, F. (2008) Building gifts into talents: Overview of the DMGT. Keynote address, 10th Asia-Pacific Conference for Giftedness, Asia-Pacific Federation of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children, Singapore, 14–17 July.Google Scholar
  19. Harrison, W. F., & Riza, M. G. (2007). Creating a toolkit for identifying twice exceptional students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(1), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hishinuma, E. S., & Nishimura, S. T. (2000). Parent attitudes on the importance and success of integrated self-contained services for students who are gifted, learning disabled, and gifted/learning disabled. Roeper Review, 22(4), 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hua, C. B. (2002). Career self-efficacy of the student who is gifted/learning disabled: a case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25(4), 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2004). Educational research, quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. 2nd ed. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Karnes, F. A., Shaunessy, E., & Bisland, A. (2004). Gifted students with disabilities: are we finding them? Gifted Child Today, 27(4), 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kemper, E., Stringfield, S., Teddlie, C. (2003). Mixed methods sampling strategies in social science research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research.Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Leggett, D. G., Shea, I., & Wilson, J. A. (2010). Advocating for twice-exceptional students: an ethical obligation. Research in the Schools, 17(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  26. Maker, C. J., & Udall, A. J. (1997). Giftedness and learning disabilities. Retrieved From http://www.ldonline.org/article/Gifted_and_Learning_Disabilities/6071. Accessed 13 May, 2009.
  27. Mann, R. L. (2006). Effective strategies for gifted/learning-disabled students with spatial strengths. The Journal of Secondary Education, 17(2), 112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCoach, D. B., Kehle, T. J., Bray, M. A., & Siegle, D. (2001). Best practices in the identification of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38(5), 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Minner, S. (1990). Teacher evaluations of case descriptions of LD/gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(1), 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Munro, J. (2002). Understanding and identifying gifted learning disabled students. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(2), 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nass, R. D. (1993). Sex differneces in learning disabilties and disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nielsen, M. E. (2002). Gifted students with learning disabilities: recommendations for identification and programming. Exceptionality, 10, 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Olenchak, F. R. (2009). Effects of talents unlimited counselling on gifted/learning disabled students. Gifted Education International, 25, 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olenchak, F. R., & Reis, S. M. (2002). Gifted students with learning disabilities. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children (pp. 177–191). Austin, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pereles, D. A., Omdal, S., & Baldwin, L. (2009). Response to intervention and twice-exceptional learners: a promising fit. Gifted Child Today, 32, 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reis, S. M., McGuire, J. M., & Neu, T. W. (2000). Compensation strategies used by high ability students with learning disabilities who succeed in college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(2), 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reis, S. M., Neu, T. W., & McGuire, J. M. (1997). Talents in two places: case studies of high ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved. Exceptional Children, 63, 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reis, S. M., & Ruban, L. (2005). Service and programs for academically talented students with learning disabilities. Theory into Practice, 44, 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rogers, K. B. (2002). Re-forming gifted education: how parents and teachers can match the program to the child. Scottsdale: Great Potential Press Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Rogers, K. B. (2011). Thinking smart about twice exceptional learners: steps to find them and strategies for catering to them appropriately. In C. Wormald & W. Vialle (Eds), Dual exceptionality (pp. 57–70). Wollongong: University of Wollongong Printery.Google Scholar
  42. Schiff, M., Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1981). Scatter analysis of WISC- R profiles for learning disabled children with superior intelligence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 400–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shaywitz, S. E., Holahan, J. M., Freudenheim, D. A., Flethcer, J. M., Makuch, R. W., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2001). Heterogeneity within the gifted: higher IQ boys exhibit behaviors resembling boys with learning disabilities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(1), 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shevitz, B., Weinfeld, R., Jeweler, S., & Barnes-Robinson, L. (2003). Mentoring empowers gifted/learning disabled students to soar. Roeper Review, 26(1), 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tallent-Runnels, M. K., & Sigler, E. A. (1995). Gifted students with learning disabilities: the status of the selection of gifted students with learning disabilities for gifted programs. Roeper Review, 17(4), 246–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Waldron, K. A., & Saphire, D. G. (1990). An analysis of WISC-R factors for gifted students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(8), 491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weinfeld, R. B., Barnes-Robinson, L., Jeweler, S., & Shevitz, B. (2002). Academic programs for gifted and talented/learning disabled students. Roeper Review, 24(4), 226–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weinfeld, R. B., Barnes-Robinson, L., Jeweler, S., & Shevitz, B. (2005). What we have learned: experiences in providing adaptations and accommodations for gifted and talented students with learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(1), 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Willard-Holt, C., Weber, J., Morrison, K. L., & Horgan, J. (2013). Twice-exceptional learners’ perspectives on effective learning strategies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wormald, C., Rogers, K. B., & Vialle, W. (2015). A case study of gifted and learning disabilities: bridging the two exceptionalities. Roeper Review, 37(3), 124–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations