Advertisement

Equilibrium-Aware Shape Design for Concrete Printing

Chapter

Abstract

This paper proposes an Interactive Design Environment and outlines the underlying computational framework to adapt equilibrium modelling techniques from rigid-block masonry to the multi-phase material typically used in large-scale additive manufacture. It focuses on enabling the synthesis of geometries that are structurally and materially feasible vis-a-vis 3D printing with compression-dominant materials. The premise of the proposed research is that the material printed in layers can be viewed as micro-scale bricks that are initially soft, and harden over time—a kind of micro-stereotomy. This insight, and the observation about the necessity of design exploration yields the principal contributions of the paper: A computational framework that allows for geometric reasoning about shape and exploration of associated design-space, and early, proof-of-concept results.

Keywords

3D printing Equilibrium modelling Shape design Unreinforced masonry Concrete and clay printing 

References

  1. Bærentzen, J.A., Abdrashitov, R., Singh, K.: Interactive shape modeling using a skeleton-mesh co-representation. ACM Trans. Graph. (TOG) 33(4), 132 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baraff, D.: Analytical methods for dynamic simulation of non-penetrating rigid bodies. In: ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, pp. 223–232. ACM (1989)Google Scholar
  3. Baraff, D.: An introduction to physically based modeling: rigid body simulation II—nonpenetration constraints. In: SIGGRAPH Course Notes, pp. D31–D68 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. Block, P., Ochsendorf, J.: Thrust network analysis: a new methodology for three-dimensional equilibrium. J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spat. Struct. 155, 167 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. Buswell, R.A., et al.: Freeform construction: mega-scale rapid manufacturing for construction. Autom. Constr. 16(2), 224–231 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buswell, R.A., et al.: Design, data and process issues for mega-scale rapid manufacturing machines used for construction. Autom. Constr. 17(8), 923–929 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chien, S., et al.: Parametric customisation of a 3D concrete printed pavilion. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia CAADRIA 2016, pp. 549–558. The Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), Hong Kong (2016)Google Scholar
  8. Culmann, K.: Die graphische statik. Meyer & Zeller (A. Reimann), Zurich (1875)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Cundall, P.A.: Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model—part I. A scheme to detect and represent contacts in a system composed of many polyhedral blocks. In: International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, pp. 107–116. Elsevier (1988)Google Scholar
  10. Cundall, P.A., Strack, O.D.L.: A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29(1), 47–65 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CyBe-Construction: CyBe Construction—Redefining Construction. Available at: https://www.cybe.en/ (2016)
  12. De Goes, F., et al.: On the equilibrium of simplicial masonry structures. ACM Trans. Graph. (TOG) 32(4), 93 (2013)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. De Kestelier, X., Buswell, R.A.: A digital design environment for large-scale rapid manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, pp. 201–208 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. Dini, E.: D-Shape. Monolite UK Ltd. http://www.d-shape.com/cose.htm (2009)
  15. Fallacara, G.: Toward a stereotomic design: experimental constructions and didactic experiences. In: Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Construction History, p. 553 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. Fivet, C., Zastavni, D.: Robert Maillart’s key methods from the Salginatobel Bridge design process (1928). J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spat. Struct. J. IASS 53(171), 39–47 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. Frick, U., Van Mele, T., Block, P.: Data management and modelling of complex interfaces in imperfect discrete-element assemblies. In: Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Symposium, Tokyo, Japan (2016)Google Scholar
  18. Frick, U., Van Mele, T., Block, P.: Decomposing three-dimensional shapes into self-supporting, discrete-element assemblies. In: Modelling Behaviour, pp. 187–201. Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  19. Gosselin, C., et al.: Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high performance concrete—a new processing route for architects and builders. Mater. Des. 100, 102–109 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hahn, J.K.: Realistic animation of rigid bodies. In: ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, pp. 299–308. ACM (1988)Google Scholar
  21. Harada, T.: Real-time rigid body simulation on GPUs. GPU Gems 3, 123–148 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. Hart, R., Cundall, P.A., Lemos, J.: Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model—part II. Mechanical calculations for motion and interaction of a system composed of many polyhedral blocks. In: International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, pp. 117–125. Elsevier (1988)Google Scholar
  23. Hernandez, C.R.B.: Thinking parametric design: introducing parametric Gaudi. Des. Stud. 27(3), 309–324 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heyman, J.: The stone skeleton. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2(2), 249–279 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ji, Z., Liu, L., Wang, Y.: B‐Mesh: a modeling system for base meshes of 3D articulated shapes. In: Computer Graphics Forum, pp. 2169–2177. Wiley Online Library (2010)Google Scholar
  26. Jiang, C., et al.: Interactive modeling of architectural freeform structures: combining geometry with fabrication and statics. In: Advances in Architectural Geometry 2014, pp. 95–108. Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  27. Khoshnevis, B.: Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies. Autom. Constr. 13(1), 5–19 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khoshnevis, B., et al.: Mega-scale fabrication by contour crafting. Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 1(3), 301–320 (2006)Google Scholar
  29. Kwon, H.: Experimentation and analysis of contour crafting (CC) process using uncured ceramic materials, thesis, Faculty of the graduate school University of Southern California (2002)Google Scholar
  30. Lachauer, L.: Interactive Equilibrium Modelling—A New Approach to the Computer-Aided Exploration of Structures in Architecture. Ph.D. thesis. ETH Zurich, Department of Architecture, Zurich (2015)Google Scholar
  31. Le, T.T., Austin, S.A., Lim, S., Buswell, R.A., Law, R., et al.: Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 42(3), 558–566 (2012a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Le, T.T., Austin, S.A., Lim, S., Buswell, R.A., Gibb, A.G.F., et al.: Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete. Mater. Struct. 45(8), 1221–1232 (2012b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu, Y., et al.: Computing self-supporting surfaces by regular triangulation. ACM Trans. Graph. (TOG) 32(4), 92 (2013)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Livesley, R.K.: Limit analysis of structures formed from rigid blocks. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 12(12), 1853–1871 (1978)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Livesley, R.K.: A computational model for the limit analysis of three-dimensional masonry structures. Meccanica 27(3), 161–172 (1992)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Mechtcherine, V., et al.: Simulation of fresh concrete flow using Discrete Element Method (DEM): theory and applications. Mater. Struct. 47(4), 615–630 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Monreal, A.: T-norms, T-conorms, aggregation operators and Gaudí’s columns. In: Soft Computing in Humanities and Social Sciences, pp. 497–515. Springer (2012)Google Scholar
  38. Perrot, A., Rangeard, D., Pierre, A.: Structural built-up of cement-based materials used for 3D-printing extrusion techniques. Mater. Struct. 49(4), 1213–1220 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rippmann, M.: Funicular Shell Design: Geometric Approaches to Form Finding and Fabrication of Discrete Funicular Structures. Ph.D. Thesis, ETH Zurich, Department of Architecture, Zurich (2016)Google Scholar
  40. Sakarovitch, J.: Stereotomy, a multifaceted technique. In: Huerta, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, pp. 69–79 (2003)Google Scholar
  41. Shyshko, S., Mechtcherine, V.: Simulating the workability of fresh concrete. In: Proceedings of the International RILEM Symposium Of Concrete Modelling—CONMOD, pp. 173–181 (2008)Google Scholar
  42. Stomakhin, A., et al.: A material point method for snow simulation. ACM Trans. Graph. (TOG) 32(4), 102 (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Sulsky, D., Zhou, S.-J., Schreyer, H.L.: Application of a particle-in-cell method to solid mechanics. Comput. Phys. Commun. 87(1), 236–252 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Tang, C., et al.: Form-Finding with Polyhedral Meshes Made Simple. http://www.geometrie.tugraz.at/wallner/formfinding2.pdf (2012)
  45. Tanigawa, Y., Mori, H.: Analytical study on deformation of fresh concrete. J. Eng. Mech. 115(3), 493–508 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Mele, T., et al.: Best-fit thrust network analysis. In: Shell Structures for Architecture-Form Finding and Optimization, pp. 157–170. Routledge (2014)Google Scholar
  47. Vouga, E., et al.: Design of self-supporting surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 31(4) (2012)Google Scholar
  48. Wangler, T., et al.: Digital concrete: opportunities and challenges. RILEM Tech. Lett. 1, 67–75 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Whiting, E.J.W.: Design of structurally-sound masonry buildings using 3D static analysis, Diss, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2012)Google Scholar
  50. Wolfs, R., Salet, T.A.M.: 3D printing of concrete structures, graduation thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2015)Google Scholar
  51. XtreeE: XtreeE| The large-scale 3D (2016)Google Scholar
  52. Zastavni, D.: The structural design of Maillart’s Chiasso Shed (1924): a graphic procedure. Struct. Eng. Int. 18(3), 247–252 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.  2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ETH Zurich, Institute of Technology in Architecture, Block Research GroupZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations