Advertisement

A Novel Nearest Feature Learning Classifier for Ship Target Detection in Optical Remote Sensing Images

  • Bo Huang
  • Tingfa Xu
  • Yuxin Luo
  • Sining Chen
  • Bo Liu
  • Bo Yuan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 463)

Abstract

Satellite remote sensing data is becoming more and more abundant, In order to realize automatic detection of ships on the sea surface, this paper presents an adaptive intelligent ship detection method, a novel nearest feature learning classifier (NFLC), which combines the scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) feature extraction with nearest feature learning classification. Due to the wide variety of detection ships, the NFLC can obtain a better experimental result than conventional detection methods. The detection accuracy is enhanced by the feature training in large databases and the performance of the system can be continuously improved through the target learning. In addition, compared to convolutional neural network algorithm, it can save the computation time by using the nearest feature matching. The result shows that almost all of the offshore ships can be detected, and the total detection rate is 89.3% with 1000 experimental optical remote sensing images from Google Earth data.

Keywords

Optical remote sensing images Ship detection The NFLC Nearest feature learning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Major Science Instrument Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61527802, and the General Program of National Nature Science Foundation of China under Grant 61371132, 61471043.

References

  1. 1.
    Eldhuset, K.: An automatic ship and ship wake detection system for spaceborne SAR images in coastal regions. Geosci. Remote Sens. IEEE Trans. 34(4), 1010–1019 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhou, J., Tian, J.: Method of detecting small target in port-sea background. Infrared Laser Eng. 34(4), 486–489 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    You, X., Xu, S., Hou, L.: A new method for ship detection based on feature fusion in optical image. Comput. Eng. Appl. 41(19), 199–202 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xing, X.W., Chen, Z.L., Zou, H.X., et al.: A fast algorithm based on two-stage CFAR for detecting ships in SAR images. In: Asian-Pacific Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, APSAR 2009, pp. 506–509. IEEE Xplore (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leng, X., Ji, K., Yang, K., et al.: A bilateral CFAR algorithm for ship detection in SAR images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 12(7), 1–5 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    An, W., Xie, C., Yuan, X.: An improved iterative censoring scheme for CFAR ship detection with SAR imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52(8), 4585–4595 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qi, S., Ma, J., Lin, J., et al.: Unsupervised ship detection based on saliency and S-HOG descriptor from optical satellite images. Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. IEEE 12(7), 1451–1455 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheng, G., Zhou, P., Han, J.: Learning rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for object detection in VHR optical remote sensing images. PP(99), 1–11 (2016) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shi, Z., Yu, X., Jiang, Z., et al.: Ship detection in high-resolution optical imagery based on anomaly detector and local shape feature. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52(8), 4511–4523 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shuai, T., Sun, K., Shi, B., et al.: A ship target automatic recognition method for sub-meter remote sensing images. In: International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications, pp. 153–156 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han, J., Zhou, P., Zhang, D., et al.: Efficient, simultaneous detection of multi-class geospatial targets based on visual saliency modeling and discriminative learning of sparse coding. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 89(1), 37–48 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhao, F., Wei, L., Chen, H.: Optimal time allocation for wireless information and power transfer in wireless powered communication systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 65(3), 1830–1835 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhao, F., Nie, H., Chen, H.: Group buying spectrum auction algorithm for fractional frequency reuses cognitive cellular systems. Ad Hoc Netw. 58, 239–246 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhao, F., Li, B., Chen, H., Lv, X.: Joint beamforming and power allocation for cognitive MIMO systems under imperfect CSI based on game theory. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 73(3), 679–694 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhao, F., Sun, X., Chen, H., Bie, R.: Outage performance of relay-assisted primary and secondary transmissions in cognitive relay networks. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2014(1), 60 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhao, F., Wang, W., Chen, H., Zhang, Q.: Interference alignment and game-theoretic power allocation in MIMO heterogeneous sensor networks communications. Signal Process. 126, 173–179 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bo Huang
    • 1
  • Tingfa Xu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yuxin Luo
    • 3
  • Sining Chen
    • 1
  • Bo Liu
    • 1
  • Bo Yuan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Optoelectronics, Image Engineering and Video Technology LabBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic Imaging Technology and SystemMinistry of Education of ChinaBeijingChina
  3. 3.The High School Affiliated to Beijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations