DOA Estimation with Array Antenna Under the Circumstance of Multiple Errors

  • Nanchi Su
  • Qing Guo
  • Xiuhong Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 463)


Direction of arrival (DOA) estimation is an important research direction of the array signal processing in many fields, such as radar, communications, sonar etc. which has very broad application prospects. However, in the processing of spatial spectrum estimation, the array errors including mutual errors and amplitude and phase errors are hard to be ignored, which may cause discrepancies between array manifold and hypothetical model, thus DOA algorithm performance model based on the ideal model decreases, which will affect the actual application of DOA algorithm. Therefore, it is significant to strengthen the stability of spatial spectrum estimation in actual application. They will be discussed in this paper including method of correcting errors under the circumstance that multiple errors exist at the same time. It is mainly about the common inconsistencies errors of amplitude and phase and array elements mutual coupling error, which are combined with MUSIC algorithm of subspace class used in uniform linear arrays (ULAs).


DOA Array error Joint self-correcting MUSIC algorithm ULAs 


  1. 1.
    Capon, J.: High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis. Proc. IEEE 57(8), 1408–1418 (1969)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krim, H., Viberg, M.: Two decades of array signal processing research: the parametric approach. IEEE Sig. Process. Mag. 13(4), 67–94 (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schmidt, R.O.: Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 34(3), 276–280 (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stoica, P., Nehorai, A.: MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao bound. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Sig. Process. 37(5), 720–741 (1989)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khallaayoun, A., Weber, R.J., Huang, Y.: A blind iterative calibration method for high resolution DOA estimation, vol. 6613, no. 1, pp. 199–204 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liao, B., Chan, S.C., Huang, L., et al.: Iterative methods for subspace and DOA estimation in nonuniform noise. IEEE Trans. Sig. Process. 64(12), 3008–3020 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friedlander, B., Weiss, A.J.: Eigenstructure methods for direction finding with sensor gain and phase uncertainties. In: International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 5, pp. 2681–2684, IEEE Xplore (1988)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, D.: Improved active calibration algorithms in the presence of channel gain/phase uncertainties and sensor mutual coupling effects. Circ. Syst. Sig. Process. 34(6), 1825–1868 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, X., He, Z., Liao, B., et al.: DOA and phase error estimation using one calibrated sensor in ULA. Multidimension. Syst. Sig. Process. 1–13 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations