Advertisement

Study of the Algorithm for the Classification of Brain Waves

  • Xinfei Ma
  • Zhihong Liu
  • Tianhao Jiang
  • Xiaochun Zhang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 463)

Abstract

The emotion belongs to higher nervous activity in the Cerebral cortex of human. Now many researchers use BCI in formal analysis, simulation, and phototyping to explore predicted system behavior between the subjective world of emotion and the objective world of the signal. This paper also compares various classifiers of emotion recognition, and then applies two sets of classifiers. The unsupervised classification include DBN, the supervised classification include Bayesclassifier and Fisherclassifier and SVM. The DNB method performed better than SVM in classification accruracy, and the Bayesclassifier is better than Fisherclassifier in run time. DBN has a higher classification accuracy and lower standard deviation, more suitable for EEG emotion recognition.

Keywords

EEG Emotion recognition Classification accuracy Bayesclassifier 

References

  1. 1.
    Yang, G., Lin, Y., Bhattacharya, P.: A driver fatigue recognition model based on information fusion and dynamic Bayesian network. Inf. Sci. 180(10), 1942–1954 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, Z.F., Wang, Z.H.: An optimization algorithm of bayesian network classifiers by derivatives of conditional log likelihood. Chin. J. Comput. 35(2), 364–374 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cummer, J.: Methodology and techniques for building modular brain-computer interfaces. Mach. Learn. 26(6), 1545–1546 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guo, Y., Wang, S., Gao, C., et al: Wishart RBM based DBN for polarimetric synthetic radar data classification. In: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, pp. 1841–1844. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kummer, B., Schultz, R.: Kuhn-Tucker-points of parametric convex programs as solutions of perturbed generalized equations. Revista Brasileira De Anestesiologia 1986(81), 28–36 (1986)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, M.K., Kim, M., Oh, E., et al.: A review on the computational methods for emotional state estimation from the human EEG. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2013(2), 573–579 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grimshaw, G.M., Carmel, D.: An asymmetric inhibition model of hemispheric differences in emotional processing. Front Psychol. 5(5), 483–489 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, Y.Y., Hsieh, S.: Classifying different emotional states by means of EEG-based functional connectivity patterns. PLoS ONE 9(4), 154–158 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahirwal, M.K., Kumar, A., Singh, G.K.: Adaptive filtering of EEG/ERP through noise cancellers using an improved PSO algorithm. Swarm Evol. Comput. 14, 76–91 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zheng, W.L., Guo, H.T., Lu, B.L.: Revealing critical channels and frequency bands for emotion recognition from EEG with deep belief network. In: International Ieee/embs Conference on Neural Engineering, pp. 154–157. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Górecka, J.: Removing physiological artifacts from the EEG data by algorithms based on differential entropy. Pomiary Automatyka Kontrola 58, 975–977 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Subasi, A.: EEG signal classification using wavelet feature extraction and a mixture of expert model. Expert Syst. Appl. Int. J. 32(4), 1084–1093 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chengdu University of Information TechnologyChengduChina

Personalised recommendations