Summarization of Credibility Evaluation of Missile Simulation Data

  • T. Koch
  • Jinlong Ma
  • Liyuan Ma
  • Dan Fang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 463)


The missile weapon system often needs a lot of simulation test during the R&D test. Because people have doubts about using the simulation model instead of the physical credibility, it is often necessary to evaluate the reliability of the simulation results. Missile simulation results of the credibility of the assessment is a very important part of an effective assessment of data credibility can shorten the missile weapon system development cycle, cost savings. This paper summarizes the main theoretical methods and research and development direction of the reliability evaluation of missile simulation data at home and abroad. This paper analyzes the gap between China’s missile simulation data evaluation and foreign countries, and puts forward some suggestions on the future research and development of missile simulation data point of view.


Simulation Credibility assessment Qualitative assessment Quantitative assessment Consistency analysis 


  1. 1.
    Hong, Z., Yuan to China: Comparison and research on reliability evaluation method of hardware-in-the-loop simulation system. Maneuverable Missile 7, 21–28 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhong, Z.: Research on Evaluation Method of Simulation Credibility, pp. 12–24. Harbin Institute of Technology (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Comparative study on verification method of simulation system model. Syst. Simul. Technol. Appl. 10, 78–82 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fei, L., Ming, Y.: Research on qualitative evaluation of simulation system. Syst. Simul. Technol. Appl. 9, 982–986 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ning, X., Wu, Y., Chen, Z.: Research on an improved gray correlation model verification method. Comput. Simul. 7(7), 259–263 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wu, Z.-H., Dong, M., Hensing, M.: Infrared seeker artificial interference performance evaluation methods. J. Syst. Simul. 17(3), 770 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Che, H.: Present situation and development of simulation technology in conventional ordnance. Comput. Simul. 3(4), 123–127 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gao, J., Wu, X.: Research on hardware-in-the–loop. Simul. Syst. Lighting Control 20(12), 6–9 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang, J., Li, Z.: Data validation in simulation model validation. J. Syst. Simul. 06(3), 258–262 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, P., Zhang, J.: A review of research on simulation credibility. Comput. Simul. 7, 12–16 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xing, Q.: Research on mathematical model verification technology of missile system. In: SPIE Proceedings, vol. IS7, pp. 202–213Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tang, X., Wang, R.: A small sample of the simulation model in the case of verification method. J. Syst. Simul., 10-1263-03 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kobayashi, O.: Definition system and criteria related to the static stability of airplanes (third report). Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 45(148), 131–138 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sarhan, A.: Non-parametric empirical Bayes procedure. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 80, 115–122 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ren, C., Sun, D., Dey, D.K.: Bayesian and frequentist estimation and prediction for exponential distributions. J. Stat. Plann. Infer. 136, 2873–2897 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShijiazhuangChina

Personalised recommendations