Embedded and Embodied Auctors

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Educational Leadership Theory book series (ELT)

Abstract

In this chapter, and section, I explicitly develop the relational extensions that constitute the relational approach to scholarship that I am advancing. Following Pierpaolo Donati, I mobilize the label auctor—meaning she/he who generates. Orthodox labels such as “agent”, with its assumed agency, and “actor”, she/he who acts upon fail to adequately weave spatio-temporal conditions and organizing activity relationally as they are built upon substantialist foundations. The specific argument of this chapter is that the centrality of organizing in the social world creates an ontological complicity in researchers (and others) that makes it difficult to epistemologically break from ordinary language. Drawing on a long line of argument, there are two aspects involved in developing my claims: (i) the constructedness of knowledge and (ii) the construction of a specific scientific focus of inquiry. Both highlight the need for analysis which shows—constructs—the relations of contemporary spatio-temporal conditions and our understanding of organizing activity.

Keywords

Auctors Ontology Epistemology Subjectivity Objectivity Educational administration Educational leadership 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Apple, M. W. (2017). Dialogue, field, and power. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 49(3), 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachelard, G. (1984[1934]). The new scientific spirit (P.A. Heelan, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. [Originally published as Le nouvel esprit scientifique. Paris: Presses Universitaries de France].Google Scholar
  3. Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1988[1984]). Homo academicus (P. Collier, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press. [Originally published as Homo academicus. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit].Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (2000[1997]). Pascalian meditations (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press. [Originally published as Méditations pascaliennes (Paris: Éditions du Seuil)].Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. Chamboredon, J.-C., & Passeron, J.,-C. (1991[1968]). The craft of sociology: Epistemological preliminaries (R. Nice, Trans.). Berlin: Walter de Guyter. [Originally published as Le métier de sociologue: Préalables épistémologiques. Paris: Mouton].Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992[1992]). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. [Originally published as Résponses: Pour une anthropologie reflexive (Paris: Seuil)].Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P., et al. (1999[1993]). The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society (P. Parkhurst Ferguson, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press. [Originally published as La misere du monde (Paris: Éditions du Seuil)].Google Scholar
  9. Cassirer, E. (1942). The influence of language upon the development of scientific thought. The Journal of Philosophy, 33(12), 309–327.Google Scholar
  10. Cherkowski, S., Currie, R., & Hilton, S. (2012). Who should rank our journals … and based on what? Journal of Educational Administration, 50(2), 206–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donati, P. (2015). Manifesto for a critical realist relational sociology. International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 25(1), 86–109.Google Scholar
  12. Eacott, S. (2015). Problematizing the intellectual gaze of the educational administration scholar. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(4), 312–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eacott, S. (2017). A social epistemology for educational administration and leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 49(3), 196–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erickson, F., & Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Garrison, J. W. (1986). Some principles of postpositivistic philosophy of science. Educational Researcher, 15(9), 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenfield, T. B. (1973). Organizations as social inventions. Paper Presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  19. Greenfield, T.B. (1974). Theory in the study of organizations and administrative structures: A new perspective. Paper Presented at the Third International Intervisitation Program on Educational Administration, Bristol, England.Google Scholar
  20. Greenfield, T. B., & Ribbins, P. (Eds.). (1993). Greenfield on educational administration: Towards a humane science. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Gronn, P. (2010). Leadership: Its genealogy, configuration and trajectory. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 42(4), 405–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kelly, S. (2008). Leadership: a categorical mistake? Human Relations, 61(6), 763–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirk, G. S. (1954). Heraclitus: The cosmic fragments. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Marcovich, M. (1967). Heraclitus. Mérida, Venezuela: University of the Andes Press.Google Scholar
  26. Metcalfe, A., & Game, A. (2015). What is a social relation? An apprenticeship in sociological imagination. North Melbourne, Victoria: Australian Scholarly Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  27. Powell, C. (2013). Radical relationism: A proposal. In C. Powell & F. Dépelteau (Eds.), Conceptualizing relational sociology: Ontological and theoretical issues (pp. 187–207). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reinhardt, K. (1916). Parmenides und die geschichte der griechischen philosophie. Bonn, Germany: Friendrich Cohen.Google Scholar
  29. Riveros, A., & Newton, P. (2016). Ontological issues in educational administration: The ontological status of educational organizations. In M.A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1–5). doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_284-1.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations