Skip to main content

Abstract

Green building is regarded as an effective way to solve the global warming problem and improve our living environment. Green building rating system is an important tool in assessing and judging whether a building is green or not. To promote the implementation of green building rating systems, the support of the policies and regulations is an essential measure. This paper focuses on the policy development in four economically developed countries or regions in Asia, including Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, and Hong Kong. The aim of the paper is to provide a reference for the improvement of green building policies and regulations as well as promotion for the development of sustainable construction industry. A comparison of their policy development paths from the perspectives of implementation mechanism, development process, and economic incentive system was conducted. Recommendations for improving the policy development in Asia are also proposed, for example promoting effective use of tax policy and discount policy, establishing long-term and practical energy saving incentives mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Building Control Act (1990) Retrieved September 29, 2017, from http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1990/act/3/enacted/en/html

  • Chan EH, Qian QK, Lam PT (2009) The market for green building in developed Asian cities-the perspectives of building designers. Energy Policy 37(8):3061–3070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau CK, Tse MS, Chung KY (2010) A choice experiment to estimate the effect of green experience on preferences and willingness-to-pay for green building attributes. Build Environ 45(11):2553–2561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cupido AF, Baetz BW, Pujari A, Chidiac S (2010) Evaluating institutional green building policies: a mixed-methods approach. J Green Build 5(1):115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuBose JR, Bosch SJ, Pearce AR (2007) Analysis of state-wide green building policies. J Green Build 2(2):161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang DP, Yang J (2011) Green building policy, regulation and rating systems analysis—green building policy, regulation and rating systems in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Constr Sci Technol 6:70–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Glavinich TE, DE P (2008) Contractor’s guide to green building construction: management, project delivery, documentation, and risk reduction. Wiley, New York, 163–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojem TS, Sørensen KH, Lagesen VA (2014) Designing a ‘green’ building: expanding ambitions through social learning. Build Res Inf 42(5):591–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong’s climate action plan 2030+ (2017). Retrieved September 29, 2017, from https://www.climateready.gov.hk/. (2017, January)

  • IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2008) Research Department. World Economic Outlook, April 2008: Housing and the Business Cycle. World Economic Outlook

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff K (2012) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo CFJ, Lin CH, Hsu MW (2016) Analysis of intelligent green building policy and developing status in Taiwan. Energy Policy 95:291–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nwokoro I, Onukwube H (2011) Sustainable or green construction in Lagos, Nigeria: principles, attributes and framework. J Sustainable Dev 4(4):166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce AR, DuBose JR, Bosch SJ (2007) Green building policy options for the public sector. J Green Build 2(1):156–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross B, López-Alcalá M, Small AA III (2007) Modeling the private financial returns from green building investments. J Green Build 2(1):97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samari M, Ghodrati N, Esmaeilifar R, Olfat P, Shafiei MWM (2013) The investigation of the barriers in developing green building in Malaysia. Mod Appl Sci 7(2):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith L (2009) Sustainability of an industry: green buildings and green events. J Green Build 4(2):63–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang RJ, Zou PX (2014) Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: a social network model. Build Environ 73:208–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu AT, Shen Q, Kelly J, Hunter K (2006) Investigation of critical success factors in construction project briefing by way of content analysis. J Constr Eng Manage 132(11):1178–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Shen L, Wu Y, Qi G (2011) Barriers to implement green strategy in the process of developing real estate projects. Open Waste Manage J 4:33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo J, Xia B, Barker J, Skitmore M (2014) Green buildings for greying people: a case study of a retirement village in Australia. Facilities 32(7/8):365–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaosen Huo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Huo, X., Yu, A.T. (2018). A Comparison of Green Building Policies in Asian Countries or Regions. In: Chau, K., Chan, I., Lu, W., Webster, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6190-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics