Advertisement

Polymer Gels pp 379-405 | Cite as

Neuro-Evolutive Techniques Applied for Modeling Processes Involving Polymer Gels

  • Silvia Curteanu
  • Elena-Niculina Dragoi
Chapter
Part of the Gels Horizons: From Science to Smart Materials book series (GHFSSM)

Abstract

This chapter presents some applications of artificial neural networks for modeling the polymer gels. A series of general aspects for this topic (neural networks) is first shortly reviewed, emphasizing the main elements of the modeling methodology. Also, general considerations related to the neuro-evolution are discussed, as an appropriate method for obtaining neural networks in an optimal form. The difficulties related to the modeling of polymerization processes are enumerated as motivation for recommending the empirical techniques. The most important part is represented by a series of examples of applications of the neuro-evolutive techniques for modeling the polyacrylamide-based hydrogels. Some examples have been published, but the last three represent new approaches. They refer, mainly, to polyacrylamide-based hydrogels modeled with neural networks of different types, used individually or aggregated in stacks, or with neural networks developed with an evolutionary algorithm (differential evolution algorithm). An inverse neural network modeling was also performed as a particular optimization. Neuro-evolution, based on neural networks and differential evolution algorithm, was also applied for modeling the release of micromolecular compounds from hydrogels.

Keywords

Polymer gel Neural networks Neuro-evolutive techniques Differential evolution Polyacrylamide-based hydrogels 

References

  1. Abbass HA (2001) A memetic pareto evolutionary approach to artificial neural networks. In: Stumptner M, Corbett D, Brooks M (eds) AI 2001: advances in artificial intelligence, vol 2256. Springer, Berlin, pp 113–152Google Scholar
  2. Azzahari AD, Yusuf SNF, Selvanathan V, Yahya R (2016) Artificial neural network and response surface methodology modeling in ionic conductivity predictions of phthaloylchitosan-based gel polymer electrolyte. Polymers 8:2–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balestrassi PP, Popova E, Paiva AP, Marangon Lima JW (2009) Design of experiments on neural network’s training for nonlinear time series forecasting. Neurocomputing 72:1160–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuéllar MP, Lapresta-Fernández A, Herrera JM, Salinas-Castillo A, Pegalajar MDC, Titos-Padilla S, Capitán-Vallvey LF (2015) Thermochromic sensor design based on Fe(II) spin crossover/polymers hybrid materials and artificial neural networks as a tool in modelling. Sens Actuators, B: Chem 208:180–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Curteanu S, Cartwright H (2011) Neural networks applied in chemistry. I. Determination of the optimal topology of neural networks. J Chemom 25:527–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Curteanu S, Leon F (2008) Optimization strategy based on genetic algorithms and neural networks applied to a polymerization process. Int J Quantum Chem 108:617–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curteanu S, Dumitrescu A, Mihailescu C, Simionescu B (2008) Neural network modeling applied to polyacrylamide based hydrogels synthetised by single step process. Polym Plast Technol Eng 47:1061–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curteanu S, Dumitrescu A, Mihailescu C, Simionescu B (2009) The synthesis of polyacrylamide-based multicomponent hydrogels. A neural network modeling. J Macromol Sci Part A Pure Appl Chem A46:368–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curteanu S, Nistor A, Curteanu N, Airinei A, Cazacu M (2010) Applying soft computing methods to fluorescence modeling of the polydimethylsiloxane/silica composites containing lanthanum. J Appl Polym Sci 117:3160–3169Google Scholar
  10. Curteanu S, Piuleac CG, Godini K, Azaryan G (2011) Modeling of electrolysis process in wastewater treatment using different types of neural networks. Chem Eng J 172:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dragoi EN, Curteanu S, Fissore D (2012) Freeze-drying modeling and monitoring using a new neuro-evolutive technique. Chem Eng Sci 72:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elizondo D, Birkenhead R, Gongora M, Taillard E, Luyima P (2007) Analysis and test of efficient methods for building recursive deterministic perceptron neural networks. Neural Netw 20:1095–1108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fe JD, Aliaga RJ, Gadea-Girones R (2015) Evolutionary optimization of neural networks with heterogeneous computation: study and implementation. J Supercomput 71:2944–2962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feoktistov V (2006) Differential evolution: in search of solutions. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernandes FAN, Lona LMF (2005) Neural network applications in polymerization processes. Braz J Chem Eng 22:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Firat M, Turan ME, Yurdusev MA (2010) Comparative analysis of neural network techniques for predicting water consumption time series. J Hydrol 51(384):46–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Floreano D, Durr P, Mattiussi C (2008) Neuroevolution: from architectures to learning. Evol Intell 1:47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hosen MA, Khosravi A, Nahavandi S, Creighton D (2014) Prediction interval-based neural network modelling of polystyrene polymerization reactor—A new perspective of data-based modelling. Chem Eng Res Des 92:2041–2051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Islam M, Yao X (2008) Evolving artificial neural network ensembles. In: Fulcher J, Jain L (eds) Computational intelligence: a compendium, vol 115. Springer, Berlin, , pp 851–880 (Reprinted from: NOT IN FILE)Google Scholar
  20. Jung JY, Reggia J (2008) The automated design of artificial neural networks using evolutionary computation. In Yang A, Shan Y, Bui L (eds) Success in evolutionary computation, vol 92. Springer, Berlin, pp 19–41Google Scholar
  21. Khayyam H, Naebe M, Zabihi O, Zamani R, Atkiss S, Fox B (2015) Dynamic prediction models and optimization of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) stabilization processes for production of carbon fiber. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 11:887–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kohl N, Miikkulainen R (2009) Evolving neural networks for strategic decision-making problems. Neural Netw 22:326–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Leon F, Ciprian GC, Curteanu S (2010) Stacked neural network modeling applied to the synthesis of polyacrylamide-based multicomponent hydrogels. Macromol React Eng 4:537–636Google Scholar
  24. Lobato J, Canizares P, Rodrigo MA, Linares JJ, Piuleac CG, Curteanu S (2009) The neural networks based modeling of a polybenzimidazole-based polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell: effect of temperature. J Power Sources 192:190–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ma L, Khorasani K (2004) New training strategies for constructive neural networks with application to regression problems. Neural Netw 17:589–609CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mihailescu C, Dumitrescu A, Simionescu BC, Bulacovschi V (2007) Synthesis of polyacrylamide—based hydrogels by simultaneous polymerization/crosslinking. Rev Roum Chim 52:1071–1076Google Scholar
  27. Piuleac CG, Curteanu S, Mihailescu C (2012) Neural network modeling applied to processes based on polyacrylamide hydrogels. In: ModTech international conference, modern technologies, quality and innovation, 24–26 May 2012, Sinaia, RomaniaGoogle Scholar
  28. Salman A, Engelbrecht AP, Omran MGH (2007) Empirical analysis of self-adaptive differential evolution. Eur J Oper Res 183:785–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shahjahan M, Murase K (2006) A pruning algorithm for training cooperative neural network ensembles. IEICE T Inf Syst E89-D(3):1257–1269Google Scholar
  30. Storn R (2008) Differential evolution research—trends and open questions. In: Chakraborty U (ed) Advances in differential evolution, vol 143. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sukthomya W, Tannock J (2005) The optimization of neural network parameters using Taguchi’s design of experiments approach: an application in manufacturing process modeling. Neural Comput Appl 14:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tian Y, Zhang J, Morris J (2001) Modeling and optimal control of a batch polymerization reactor using a hybrid stacked recurrent neural network model. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:4525–4535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Viswanathan A, MacLeod C, Maxwell G, Kalidindi S (2005) Training neural networks using Taguchi methods: overcoming interaction problems. ICANN 2:103–108Google Scholar
  34. Vlahogianni EI, Karlaftis MG, Golias JC (2005) Optimized and meta-optimized neural networks for short-term traffic flow prediction: a genetic approach. Transp Res C: Emerg Technol 13:211–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Volna E (2010) Neuroevolutionary optimization. Int J Comput Sci Issues 7:31–37Google Scholar
  36. Ward AD, Harmarneh G (2010) The groupwise medial axis transform for fuzzy skeltonization and pruning. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32:1084–1096CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Xin Y (1999) Evolving artificial neural networks. Proc IEEE 87:1423–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xing HJ, Hu BG (2009) Two-phase construction of multilayer perceptrons using information theory. IEEE Trans Neural Networks 20:715–721CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Yanfeng L, Xianzhen L, Lincheng Z, Xiaoxia Z, Bonian L (2004) Study on the synthesis and application of salt-resisting polymeric hydrogels. Polym Adv Technol 15:34–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zaharie D (2009) Influence of crossover on the behavior of differential evolution algorithms. Appl Soft Comput 9:1126–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao CY, Liu XG, Ding F (2010) Melt index prediction based on adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm-optimized radial basis function neural networks. Chem Eng Technol 33:1909–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Protection“Gheorghe Asachi” Technical UniversityIasiRomania

Personalised recommendations