Advertisement

Social Capital, Trust, and Guanxi (关系)

  • Zhen MengEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation book series (PLBI)

Abstract

This Chapter begins with a brief introduction of the social capital theory. The explanations of social capital by three seminal figures—Pierre Bourdieu, James Coleman and Robert Putnam, who are considered to have contributed much to the conceptualization of social capital—are reviewed in the first section of this Chapter. At the same time, since Nan Lin has contributed to the theoretical development, devised measurements and conducted empirical research in the areas of social networks and social capital, this Chapter also reviews his point of view on the concept of social capital. Then, this Chapter moves on to another conceptual tool: social trust. It discusses the role of social trust in various terms, especially in economic growth. A pair of relevant concepts, namely “personal trust” and “institutionalized trust”, is explained in the second section. Further, this Chapter elaborates a distinctive notion of Guanxi in China, followed by the explanation on the impacts of Guanxi on the Chinese Business Culture. In light of these concepts, this Chapter proposes a hypothesis which can explain at least a part of the issue on ownership of trust property in China. In addition, a short section in this chapter explains the Social Network theory and the Social Network Analysis.

References

  1. Adelman S, Foste K (1992) Critical legal theory: the power of law. In: Grigg-Spall I, Ireland P (eds) Critical lawyer’s handbook. Pluto Press, London, pp 39–43Google Scholar
  2. Adler PS, Kwon S-W (2013) Social capital: prospects for a new concept. In: Costa AC, Anderson N (eds) Social capital: conceptual issues and levels of analysis. Trust and social capital in organizations, vol 3. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Ai J (2006) Guanxi networks in China: its importance and future trends. China World Econ 14(5):105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azami NA, The sociological approach to law as compared with the traditional conception of law. http://www.agc.gov.my/pdf/publications/sociological_approach.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2015
  5. Becker GS (1993) Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education, 3rd edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson J (ed) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood, Westport, p 241Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu P (1989) Social space and symbolic power. Sociol Theory 7(1):14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourdieu P, Passeron J-C (1990) Reproduction in education, society and culture (trans: Richard Nice R). Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdieu P, Wacquant LJD (1992) An invitation to reflexive sciology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Castiglione D et al (eds) (2008) The oxford handbook of social capital. OUP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen M-J (2003) Inside Chinese business: a guide for managers worldwide. Harvard Business Review Press, BringhtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng L-W (ed) (2012) Handbook of contemporary marketing in China: theories and practices. Nova Science Publishers, HauppaugeGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman J (1984) Education in the post-brown era. In: Brown v. Board of education of Topeka: an assessment thirty years later. A series of lectures and discussions (Institute, West Virginia, February 10–11 and April 11–13, 1984)Google Scholar
  14. Coleman J (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. AJS 94(Supplement):95–120Google Scholar
  15. Coleman J (1994) Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. de Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batagelj V (2005) Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Easley D, Kleinberg J (2010) Networks, crowds, and markets: reasoning about a highly connected world. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ehrlich E (1936) Fundamental principles of the sociology of law (trans: Walter LM). Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Erickson BH (2001) Good networks and jobs: the value of social capital to employers and employees. In: Lin N, Cook KS, Burt RS (eds) Social capital: theory and research. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp 127–143Google Scholar
  20. Field J (2009) Social capital, 2nd edn. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Foley MW, Edwards B (1999) Is it time to disinvest in Social Capital? J Public Policy 19(2):141–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press, New York CityGoogle Scholar
  23. Gauntlett D (2011) Three approaches to social capital. http://www.makingisconnecting.org/gauntlett2011-extract-sc.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2015
  24. Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. 91. Am J Sociol 91(3):481–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hsung RM, Lin N, Breiger RL (eds) (2009) Contexts of social capital: social networks in markets, communities, and famililies. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Hwang K-K (1987) Face and favor: the Chinese power game. Am J Sociol 92(4):944–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackman RW, Miller RA (1998) Social capital and politics. Annu Rev Polit Sci 1:47–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knack S, Keefer P (1997) Does social capital have an economic payoff? a cross-country investigation. Q J Econ 112(4):1251–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kramer RM, Tyler TR (eds) (1996) Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin N (2001) Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lin N, Cook KS, Burt RS (eds) (2001) Social capital: theory and research. Aldine de Gruyter, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin N, Fu Y-C, Chen CJ (eds) (2014) Social capital and its institutional contingency: a study of the United States, China and Taiwan. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Luhmann N (1979) Trust and power. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  34. Luhmann N (2000) Familiarity, confidence, trust: problems and alternatives. In: Diego G (ed) Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 94–107Google Scholar
  35. Luo J-D, Yeh Y-C (2009) The transaction cost: embeddedness approach to studying Chinese outsourcing. In: Hsung R et al (eds) Contexts of social capital social: networks in markets, communities and families. Routledge, London, pp 115–138Google Scholar
  36. Lyon F et al (2006) Introduction: the variety of methods for the multi-faceted phenomenon of trust. In: Lyon F et al (eds) Handbook of research methods on trust. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  37. Mankiw NG (2008) Principles of economics, 5th edn. Cengage Learning, BostonGoogle Scholar
  38. Matsuda M, Yamagishi T (2001) Trust and cooperation: an experimental study of PD with choice of dependence. Jpn J Psychol 72(5):413–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nathan AJ (1993) Is Chinese culture distinctive? a review article. J Asian Stud 52(4):923–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Potter PB (2002) Guanxi and the PRC legal system: from contradiction to complementarity. In: Gold T et al (eds) Social connections in China. CUP, Cambridge, pp 179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prell C (2012) Social network analysis: history, theory and methodology. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Putnam RD (1993a) The prosperous community: social capital and public life. 13. Am Prospect 13:35–42Google Scholar
  43. Putnam RD (1993b) What makes democracy work? Natl Civic Rev 82(2):101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Putnam RD (1996a) The decline of civil society: how come? so what? The John L. Manion Lecture. Canadian Centre for Management Development, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  45. Putnam RD (1996b) The strange disappearance of civic America. Policy-St Leonards 12:3–15Google Scholar
  46. Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster, New York CityCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Risto S, Kirsimarja B, Sanna S (2007) Measuring inter-organizational trust—a critical review of the empirical research in 1990–2003. Ind Mark Manag 36(2):249–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schultz TW (1961) Investment in human capital. AER 151(1):1–17Google Scholar
  49. Shapiro DL, Sheppard BH, Cheraskin L (1992) Business on a handshake. Negot J 8(4):365–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stiglitz JE (2000) Formal and informal institutions. In: Dasgupta P, Serageldin I (eds) Social capital: a multifaceted perspective. World Bank, Washington DC, p 59Google Scholar
  51. Swedberg R (1996) Analyzing the economy: on the contribution of James S. Coleman. In: Clark J (ed) James S. Coleman. The Falmer Press, pp 313–328Google Scholar
  52. Teramoto S, Jurčys P (2013) Intermediaries, trust and efficiency of communication: a social network perspective. In: Fenwick M, van Uytsel S, Wrbka S (eds) Networked governance,transnational business and the law. Springer, Berlin, pp 99–126Google Scholar
  53. Tzanakis M (2013) Social capital in Bourdieu’s, Coleman’s and Putnam’s theory: empirical evidence and emergent measurement issues, http://wh.agh.edu.pl/other/materialy/672_2014_04_23_13_04_24_Spcial_capital2.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2015
  54. Uslaner EM (2002) The moral foundations of trust. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walker G, Kogut B, Shan W (2013) Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. In: Costa AC, Anderson N (eds) Social capital: organizational advantage and inter-organizational networks. Trust and social capital in organizations, vol 4. Sage, London, pp 173–200Google Scholar
  56. Welter F, Alex N (2012) Research trust in different cultures. In: Lyon Fergus et al (eds) Handbook of research methods on trust. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 50–60Google Scholar
  57. Williamson OE (1996) The mechanisms of governance. OUP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Zak PJ, Knack S (2001) Trust and growth. Econ J 111(470):295–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zucker LG (1986) Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure 1840–1920. Res Organ Behav 8:53–111Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Law, School of Intellectual PropertyNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations