Soil Metagenomics: A Tool for Sustainable Agriculture

  • Reeta Goel
  • Deep Chandra Suyal
  • Narayan
  • Biplab Dash
  • Ravindra Soni
Chapter

Abstract

Microorganisms are considered as an unlimited, untapped, and intriguing source for development of novel genes, antibiotics, bioinoculants, biocatalysts, etc. Therefore, the identification and characterization of the microbial wealth becomes inevitable. Besides other features of bacteria that are a challenge to health, including increase in pathogenicity, antibiotic resistance, mounting host spectra, and possibility of usage for bioterrorism, it becomes a compulsion. Furthermore, a sustainable agriculture development program that frequently exploits the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) also requires a correct identification and characterization of agriculturally important microorganisms. Metagenomics is defined as the study of all available genomes in an environment that contains considerably more genetic information than provided by the cultured subset. It also helps in bridging the gap between genetics and ecology, indicating that the genes of a single microorganism are connected to the genes of other members of the community.

Keywords

Metagenomics Agriculture Himalayan Soil 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The work mentioned in this chapter from author group was supported by the National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms, India (NBAIM/ICAR), grant to R.G.

References

  1. Aakvik T, Degnes KF, Dahlsrud R, Schmidt F, Dam R, Yu L, Völker U, Ellingsen TE, Valla S (2009) A plasmid RK2–based broad–host–range cloning vector useful for transfer of metagenomic libraries to a variety of bacterial species. FEMS Microbiol Lett 296:149–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01639.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Albers SV, Jonuscheit M, Dinkelaker S, Urich T, Kletzin A, Tampe R, Driessen AJM, Schleper C (2006) Production of recombinant and tagged proteins in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:102–111. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.102-111.2006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelov A, Mientus M, Liebl S, Liebl W (2009) A two–host fosmid system for functional screening of (meta) genomic libraries from extreme thermophiles. Syst Appl Microbiol 3:177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailly J, Fraissinet-Tachet L, Verner MC, Debaud JC, Lemaire M, Wésolowski-Louvel M, Marmeisse R (2007) Soil eukaryotic functional diversity, a metatranscriptomic approach. ISME J 1:632–642. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2007.68 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein JR, Bulter T, Shen CR, Liao JC (2007) Directed evolution of ribosomal protein S1 for enhanced translational efficiency of high GC Rhodopseudomonas palustris DNA in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 282:18929–18936. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M701395200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Craig JW, Chang FY, Kim JH, Obiajulu SC, Brady SF (2010) Expanding small–molecule functional metagenomics through parallel screening of broad–host–range cosmid environmental DNA libraries in diverse proteobacteria. App Environ Microbiol 76:1633–1641. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02169-09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delmont TO, Robe P, Clark I, Simonet P, Vogel TM (2011) Metagenomic comparison of direct and indirect soil DNA extraction approaches. J Microbiol Methods 86:397–400. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.06.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferrari BC, Binnerup SJ, Gillings M (2005) Microcolony cultivation on a soil substrate membrane system selects for previously uncultured soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(12):8714–8720. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8714-8720.2005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Handelsman J, Rondon MR, Brady SF, Clardy J, Goodman RM (1998) Molecular biological access to the chemistry of unknown soil microbes: a new frontier for natural products. Chem Biol 5:245–249. doi: 10.1016/S1074-5521(98)90108-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Illeghems K, Weckx S, Vuyst LD (2015) Applying meta-pathway analyses through metagenomics to identify the functional properties of the major bacterial communities of a single spontaneous cocoa bean fermentation process sample. Int J Food Microbiol 50:54–63. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2015.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones JG (1977) The effect of environmental factors on estimated viable and total populations of planktonic bacteria in lakes and experimental enclosures. Freshwater Biol 7:67–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1977.tb01659.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lämmle K, Zipper H, Breuer M, Hauer B, Buta C, Brunner H, Rupp S (2007) Identification of novel enzymes with different hydrolytic activities by metagenome expression cloning. J Biotechnol 127:575–592. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.07.036 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu Y, Yao T, Jiao N, Kang S, Xu B, Zeng Y, Huang S, Liu X (2009) Bacterial diversity in the snow over Tibetan Plateau Glaciers. Extremophiles 13:411–423. doi: 10.1007/s00792-009-0227-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. McGarvey KM, Queitsch K, Fields S (2012) Wide variation in antibiotic resistance proteins identified by functional metagenomic screening of a soil DNA library. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:1708–1714. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06759-11 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Nacke H, Will C, Herzog S, Nowka B, Engelhaupt M, Daniel R (2011) Identification of novel lipolytic genes and gene families by screening of Metagenomic libraries derived from soil samples of the German Biodiversity Exploratories. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78:188–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01088.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pham VH, Kim J (2012) Cultivation of unculturable soil bacteria. Trends Biotechnol 30(9):475–484. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.05.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pradhan S, Srinivas TNR, Pindi PK, Kishore KH, Begum Z, Singh PK, Singh AK, Pratibha MS, Yasala AK, Reddy GS, Shivaji S (2010) Bacterial biodiversity from Roopkund glacier, Himalayan mountain ranges, India. Extremophiles 14:377–395. doi: 10.1007/s00792-010-0318-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. PremaLatha K, Soni R, Khan M, Marla SS, Goel R (2009) Exploration of csp gene(s) from temperate and glacier soils of Indian Himalaya and in silico analysis of encoding proteins. Curr Microbiol 58:343–348. doi: 10.1007/s00284-008-9344-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Raynaud X, Nunan N (2014) Spatial ecology of bacteria at the microscale in soil. PLoS One 9(1):e87217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087217 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Shivaji S, Pratibha MS, Sailaja B, Kishore KH, Singh AK, Begum Z, Anarasi U, Prabagaran SR, Reddy GSN, Srinivas TNR (2011) Bacterial diversity of soil in the vicinity of Pindari glacier, Himalayan mountain ranges, India, using culturable bacteria and soil 16S rRNA gene clones. Extremophiles 15:1–22. doi: 10.1007/s00792-010-0333-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Soni R, Goel R (2010) Triphasic approach for assessment of bacterial population in different soil systems. Ekologija 56:94–98. doi: 10.2478/v10055-010-0014-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Soni R, Goel R (2011) nifH homologous from soil metagenome. Ekologija 57:87–95. doi: 10.6001/ekologija.v57i3.1914 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sørensen HP, Mortensen KK (2005) Advanced genetic strategies for recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol 115:113–128. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(97)01155-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Surmann E-M, Efferth T (2014) Biodiversity and metagenomics. In: Kuete V, Efferth T (eds) Biodiversity natural, products and cancer treatment. World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, pp 35–69. doi: 10.1142/9789814583510_0002 Google Scholar
  25. Suyal DC, Yadav A, Shouche Y, Goel R (2015a) Bacterial diversity and community structure of Western Indian Himalayan red kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) rhizosphere as revealed by 16S rRNA gene sequences. Biologia 70:305–313. doi: 10.1515/biolog-2015-0048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Suyal DC, Yadav A, Shouche Y, Goel R (2015b) Diversified diazotrophs associated with the rhizosphere of Western Indian Himalayan native red kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) 3Biotech 5:433–441. doi: 10.1007/s13205-014-0238-5 Google Scholar
  27. Treusch AH, Leininger S, Kletzin A, Schuster SC, Klenk HP, Schleper C (2005) Novel genes for nitrite reductase and Amo–related proteins indicate a role of uncultivated mesophilic crenarchaeota in nitrogen cycling. Environ Microbiol 7:1985–1995. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00906.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Troeschel SC, Drepper T, Leggewie C, Streit WR, Jaeger KE (2010) Novel tools for the functional expression of metagenomic DNA. Methods Mol Biol 668:117–139. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-823-2_8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang GY, Graziani E, Waters B, Pan W, Li X, McDermott J, Meurer G, Saxena G, Andersen RJ, Davies J (2000) Novel natural products from soil DNA libraries in a streptomycete host. Org Lett 10:2401–2404. doi: 10.1021/ol005860z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang X, Yao T, Tian L, Xu S, An L (2008) Phylogenetic and physiological diversity of bacteria isolated from Puruogangri ice core. Microbiol Ecol 55:476–488. doi: 10.1007/s00248-007-9293-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reeta Goel
    • 1
  • Deep Chandra Suyal
    • 1
  • Narayan
    • 2
  • Biplab Dash
    • 2
  • Ravindra Soni
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyCBSH, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and TechnologyPantnagarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural MicrobiologyCollege of Agriculture, Indira Gandhi Krishi VishwavidyalayaRaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations