Advertisement

Real Exchange Rate, Trade Balance and Deindustrialization in Indonesia

  • Fithra Faisal Hastiadi
  • Amelia Nurunnisa
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter raises the current issues in Indonesia that link the instability of exchange rates to the deindustrialization phenomenon. This association has not been studied directly in previous studies. This chapter finds that these problems are interrelated and cannot be separated from each other. Deindustrialization problems in Indonesia, which are explained by the decline in manufacturing exports, decline in manufacturing labour productivity, the trade balance deficit and investment displacement from the tradable sector (manufacturing), directly and indirectly affect the exchange rate. The implication of this chapter is that government should pay attention to the Indonesian manufacturing sector in solving the exchange rate problem.

References

  1. Aghion, P., Bacchetta, P., Ranciere, R., & Rogoff, A. K. (2006). Exchange Rate Volatility and Productivity Growth: The Role of Financial Development (NBER Working Paper No. 12117). http://www.nber.org/papers/w12117
  2. Ahmed, S., & Chhibber, A. (1989). How Can Indonesia Maintain Creditwothiness and Noninflationary Growth? (Policy Research Working Paper Series The World Bank No. 291). http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/425341468774923750/pdf/multi0page.pdf
  3. Aizenman, J., & Marion, N. (1993). Policy Uncertainty, Persistence and Growth. Review of International Economics, 1(2), 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bank Indonesia. (2014). Maintaining Stability, Advancing Structural Reform for Sustainable Economic Growth, Bank Indonesia Annual Report: Economic Report on Indonesia.Google Scholar
  5. Bank Indonesia. (2015a, July 6). Kurs Transaksi Bank Indonesia Mata Uang USD. Retrieved from Bank Indonesia: http://www.bi.go.id/id/moneter/informasi-kurs/transaksi-bi/Default.aspx
  6. Bank Indonesia. (2015b). Laporan Posisi Investasi Internasional Indonesia Triwulan IV-2014. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.Google Scholar
  7. CEIC. (2014). Ceic Global Economic Data. https://www.ceicdata.com/en
  8. Douglas Bernheim, B. (1988). Budget Deficits and the Balance of Trade, NBER Chapters. In: Tax Policy and the Economy: Volume 2 (pp 1–32). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. https://ideas.repec.org/h/nbr/nberch/10935.html
  9. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Huchet-Bourdon, M., & Korinek, J. (2011). To What Extent Do Exchange Rates and Their Volatility Affect Trade? (OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 119).Google Scholar
  11. Kitson, M., & Michie, J. (1997). Does Manufacturing Matter? International Journal of the Economics of Business, 4(1), 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Krugman, P. R. (1988). Deindustrialization, Reindustrialization and the Real Exchange Rate. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krugman, P. R., Baldwin, R. E., Bosworth, B., & Hooper, P. (1987). The Persistence of the US Trade Deficit. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mussa, M. L. (1984). The Theory of Exchange Rate Determination. In J. F. Bilson & R. C. Marston (Eds.), Exchange Rate Theory and Practice (pp. 13–78). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Nouira, R., Plane, P., & Sekkat, K. (2011). Exchange Rate Undervaluation and Manufactured Exports: A Deliberate Strategy? Journal of Comparative Economics, 39, 584–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pieper, U. (1998). Openness and Structural Dynamics of Productivity and Employment in Developing Countries: A Case of De-industrialisation? Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  17. Rowthorn, R., & Ramaswamy, R. (1999). Growth, Trade and Deindustrialization. IMF Staff Papers, 46 (1), 18–41.Google Scholar
  18. Salvatore, D. (2012). Introduction to International Economics, 3rd Edition International Student Version. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Singh, M. (1966). India’s Export Trends. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  20. Suhendra, I. (2003). Pengaruh Faktor Fundamental, Faktor Resiko, dan Ekspektasi Nilai Tukar terhadap Nilai Tukar Rupiah (terhadap Dollar) Pasca Penerapan Sistem Kurs Mengambang Bebas pada Tanggal 14 Agustus 1997. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan Bank Indonesia, 6 (1), 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zelekha, Y., & Bar-Efrat, O. (2011). The Link Between Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Israeli Exports to the US: 2SLS and Cointegration Approaches. Research in Economics, 65, 100–109.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fithra Faisal Hastiadi
    • 1
  • Amelia Nurunnisa
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and BusinessUniversity of IndonesiaDepokIndonesia

Personalised recommendations