Advertisement

Comparative Analysis of Coherent Routing Using Machine Learning Approach in MANET

  • AyushreeEmail author
  • G. N. Balaji
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 77)

Abstract

Ad hoc network is a network which is dynamic in nature where the mobile nodes form a temporary network in the absence of centralized administration. Due to the absence of centralized administrator in network, routing in mobile ad hoc network (MANET) becomes the fundamental issue which minimizes the selection of an optimal path for routing. Certain performance parameters such as latency, overhead, and packet delivery ratio (PDR) are affected adversely for which numerous techniques are advocated that enhances the selection of efficient and stable path. In the present paper, an attempt is made to select the optimal path and compare the results by varying the number of nodes by using knowledge-based learning algorithm. The optimal path will possess the highest average sum of relay nodes and will be considered as the most optimal and reliable path. We also proposed that analysis of throughput and PDR is better as compared to the traditional methods. The simulation is carried out at NS-2 network simulator, which is employed to implement wired and wireless ad hoc simulation.

Keywords

PDR (packet delivery ratio) Relay number Throughput AODV MANET 

References

  1. 1.
    Tseng, Y.-C., Li, Y.-F., Chang, Y.-C.: On route lifetime in multihop mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 2(4), 366–376 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Basarkod, P.I., Manvi, S.S., Albur, D.S.: Mobility based estimation of node stability in MANETs. In: International Conference on Emerging Trends in Computing, Communication and Nanotechnology (ICE-CCN), International Conference, India, pp. 126–130 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Couto, D.S.J., Aguayo, D., Bicket, J., Morris, R.: A high throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 134–146 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aggarwal, S., Ahuja, A., Singh, J.P., Shorey, R.: Route lifetime assessment based routing protocol for mobile adhoc networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC’00, New Orleans, LA, pp. 1697–1701 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dube, R., Rais, C.D., Wang, K.-Y., Tripathi, S.K.: Signal stability based adaptive routing (SSA) for ad-hoc mobile networks. IEEE Pers. Commun. 4(1), 36–45 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Su, W., Lee, S.-J., Gerla, M.: Mobility prediction and routing in ad hoc wireless networks. Int. J. Netw. Manag. 11(1), 3–30 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones, C.E., Sivalingam, K.M., Agrawal, P., Chen, J.C.: A survey of energy efficient network protocols for wireless networks. Wirel. Netw. 7(4), 343–358 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muthuramalingam, S., Janani, P., Bavya, B., Rajaram, R.: An energy conserving topology maintenance algorithm for MANET. In: 1st International Conference on Network and Communications, pp. 101–106 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chiasserini, C.-F., Rao, R.R.: Energy efficient battery management. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 19(7), 1235–1245 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rodoplu, V., Meng, T.H.: Minimum energy mobile wireless network. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 17(8), 1333–1344 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of Electronics and Communication EngineeringK L UniversityGuntur DistrictIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringK L UniversityGuntur DistrictIndia

Personalised recommendations