Advertisement

Digital Forensic Enabled Image Authentication Using Least Significant Bit (LSB) with Tamper Localization Based Hash Function

  • Ujjal Kumar Das
  • Shefalika Ghosh Samaddar
  • Pankaj Kumar Keserwani
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 19)

Abstract

Addition of hash component in a message is always for verification of authentication of message without integrity. In order to retain integrity certain schemes such as Merkle–Damgard scheme or Rabin scheme based on the block cipher can be used. However, the block cipher schemes in messages do not get applicable on image which are encoding message in a visual format. Therefore, block cipher based schemes are not able to provide tamper localization in case of image authentication. Tamper detection is needed in case of images as it is not visualized without proper verification. Moreover, localization is not possible by hash verification making the authentication processes only detectable but not identifiable. The paper presents a generation process of three least significant bits of hash function. The image insertion is not visualized due to human eye limitation. The method proposed is able to embed a secret image (gray scale) inside a corner image. Experimental results show an improvement in peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) values of the proposed technique over the other techniques available, such as hash-based LSB(2-3-3) image steganography in spatial domain. This paper proposes an image authentication process not only for robustness, security, and tamper detection but also successfully able to identify tamper by a process of tamper localization. The parameters compared include the classical mechanism along with newly introduced entropy measurement of images. A performance analysis is able to show the result claimed in the paper. The paper uses a least significant bit (LSB) based hash function, which is a blind technique as image-related information is never sent to receiver separately. In fact, the proposed approach is a clever design as the generated hash function will be embedded in the image itself. The proposed mechanism is able to offer good imperceptibility between original image and embedded image with hash bits. Even a minute tampering can be detected with proper localization; the localization of tampering is having its wide applicability in case of forensic evidence of malicious image morphing.

Keywords

Image authentication Image hashing Least significant bit (LSB) based technique Integrity Tamper detection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors express gratitude to Cloud Computing Laboratory of National Institute of Technology, Sikkim India.

References

  1. 1.
    Forouzan, B. A., & Mukhopadhyay, D.,: Cryptography and Network Security (Sie). McGraw-Hill Education (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim, Changick: Content-based image copy detection. Signal Processing: Image Communication 18, no. 3, 169–184 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu, Y. T., & Shih, F. Y.,: Digital watermarking based on chaotic map and reference register. Pattern Recognition, 40(12), (2007) 3753–3763Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Wang and X. Zhang: Recent Development of Perceptual Image Hashing. In: J. Shanghai Univ. (English ed.), vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 323–331 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Monga V.: Perceptually based methods for robust image hashing (Ph. D. thesis). Electrical Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Venkatesan R, Koon SM, Jakubowski MH, Moulin P.: Robust image hashing. In: Image Processing. Proceedings. 2000 International Conference on 2000 (Vol. 3, pp. 664–666). IEEE (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin CY, Chang SF.: Robust image authentication method surviving JPEG lossy compression. In: Photonics West’98 Electronic Imaging (pp. 296–307). International Society for Optics and Photonics. Dec 23 (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Ahmed, M.Y. Siyal, and V.U. Abbas.: A Secure and Robust Hash-Based Scheme for Image Authentication. In: Signal Processing, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1456–1470 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Schneider, S.-F. Chang: A robust content based digital signature for image authentication, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 3, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 227–230 (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C.S. Lu, C.Y. Hsu, S.W. Sun, and P.C. Chang.: Robust Mesh-Based Hashing for Copy Detection and Tracing of Images. In: Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf. Multimedia and Expo, vol. 1, pp. 731–734 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. Tang, S. Wang, X. Zhang, W. Wei, and S. Su.: Robust Image Hashing for Tamper Detection Using Non-Negative Matrix Factorization. In: J. Ubiquitous Convergence and Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–26 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Hassan, S. Chaudhury, and M. Gopal.: Feature Combination in Kernel Space for Distance Based Image Hashing. In: IEEE Trans. Multimedia, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1179–1195, Aug. (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Lu and M. Wu.: Multimedia Forensic Hash Based on Visual Words. In: Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf. Image Processing, pp. 989–992 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roy, Sujoy, and Qibin Sun.: Robust hash for detecting and localizing image tampering. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Vol. 6. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    X. Lv and Z.J. Wang.: Reduced-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on Perceptual Image Hashing. In: Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf. Image Processing, pp. 4361–4364 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C.-Y. Lin, S.-F. Chang: A robust image authentication method distinguishing JPEG compression from malicious manipulation. In: IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 11 (2) 153–168 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C.-S. Lu, H.-Y.M. Liao.: Structural digital signature for image authentication: an incidental distortion resistant scheme. In: IEEE Trans. Multimedia 5 (2) 161–173 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kundur, Deepa, and Dimitrios Hatzinakos.: Digital watermarking for telltale tamper proofing and authentication. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 87.7: 1167–1180 (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bhattacharjee, Sushil, and Martin Kutter.: Compression tolerant image authentication. In: Image Processing, 1998. ICIP 98. Proceedings. 1998 International Conference on. Vol. 1. IEEE (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Fridrich, M. Goljan.: Robust hash functions for digital water- marking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing, Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp. 178–183 (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.S. Seo, J. Haitsma, T. Kalker, C.D. Yoo.: A robust image fingerprinting system using the Radon transform.: In Signal Process.: Image Commun. 19 (4) 325–339 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S.-H. Yang, C.-F. Chen, Robust image hashing based on SPIHT, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information Technology: Research and Education, pp. 110–114 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Swaminathan, Y. Mao, M. Wu, Robust and secure image hashing, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 1 (2) 215–230 (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Y. Ou, K.H. Rhee, A key-dependent secure image hashing scheme by using Radon transform, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems, Kanazawa, Japan, pp. 595–598 (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Deepa, Nagajothi.: a secure hashing scheme for image authentication using zernike moments and local features with histogram features. In: American International Journal of Research in Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    V. Monga, M.K. Mhcak.: Robust and secure image hashing via non- negative matrix factorizations. In: IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2 (3) 376–390 (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    C. Kailasanathan, R.S. Naini, P. Ogunbona.: Compression tolerant DCT based image hash, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, pp. 562–567 (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    C.-S. Lu, C.-Y. Hsu: Geometric distortion-resilient image hashing scheme and its applications on copy detection and authentication. In: Multimedia Syst. 11 (2) 159–173 (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    V. Monga, B.L. Evans, Perceptual image hashing via feature points: Performance evaluation and tradeoffs, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15 (11) 3452–3465 (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ng, T. T., Chang, S. F., & Sun, Q: A data set of authentic and spliced image blocks. In: Columbia University, ADVENT Technical Report, 203–2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. Kirchner and J. Fridrich. On detection of median filtering in digital images. In: Media Forensics and Security II, part of the IS&T-SPIE Electronic Imaging Symposium, San Jose, CA, USA, January 18–20, Proceedings, Nasir D. Memon, Jana Dittmann, Adnan M. Alattar, and Edward J. Delp, Eds., vol. 7541 of SPIE Proceedings, p. 754110, SPIE (2010)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sowmya, K. N., & Chennamma, H. R.: A survey on video forgery detection. In: International Journal of Computer Engineering and Applications, 9(2), 17–27. (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhu, Y., Li, C. T., & Zhao, H. J.: Structural digital signature and semi-fragile fingerprinting for image authentication in wavelet domain. In: Information Assurance and Security, 2007. IAS 2007. Third International Symposium on (pp. 478–483). IEEE. (2007, August)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Manjula, G. R., & Danti, A.: A novel hash based least significant bit (2-3-3) image steganography in spatial domain. In: arXiv preprint arXiv: 1503.03674 (2015)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dasgupta, K., Mandal, J. K., & Dutta, P.: Hash based least significant bit technique for video steganography (HLSB). In: International Journal of Security, Privacy and Trust Management (IJSPTM), 1(2), 1–11 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte. Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ujjal Kumar Das
    • 1
  • Shefalika Ghosh Samaddar
    • 2
  • Pankaj Kumar Keserwani
    • 2
  1. 1.Srikrishna CollegeBagula, NadiaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science & EngineeringNational Institute of Technology SikkimRavanglaIndia

Personalised recommendations