Advertisement

China’s Strategy Towards South Asia in the Context of the Maritime Silk Road Initiative

  • Xinmin Sui
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Asia-Pacific Political Economy book series (PASTAPPE)

Abstract

China’s strategy towards South Asia (SA) presents a patchwork of bilateral relations rather than a holistic policy due to the lack of a SA identity and China’s policy preferences. China has pursued a subtle balance in SA with the exception of the antagonism that exists between it and India. China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative (MSRI) objectives, while hardly excluding strategic concerns, mainly flow from economic considerations: for example, restructuring industries, updating China’s growth model, securing resource supplies, finding new markets, and so on, while increasing participants’ benefits. For China, supplying collective goods like the Silk Road Fund and technical and financial resources is both a cost of and a means to realize the MSRI. The implementation of MSRI, because of challenges such as India’s indifference to the MSRI, is stirring China to shape an integrated SA strategy.

References

  1. Asian Development Bank. “Asian Economic Integration Monitor,” (2014). http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefwebs.int/files/reliefweb_pdf/node-654319.pdf.
  2. Axelrod, Robert. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. Bhattacharyay, Biswa. “Estimating Demand for Infrastructure in Energy, Transport, Telecommunications, Water and Sanitation in Asia and the Pacific: 2010–2020.”ADB Working Paper Series no. 248. http://www.adbi.org/working-paper/2010/09/09/4062.infrastructure.demand.asia.pacific.
  4. Blanchard, Jean-Marc F. “Probing China’s Twenty-First-Century Maritime Silk Road Initiative (MSRI): An Examination of MSRI Narratives.” Geopolitics 22, no. 2 (2017): 246–68.Google Scholar
  5. CNCP Economics & Technology Research Institute. “The Development Report of Oil & Gas Industry 2014.” http://etri.cnpc.com.cn/etri/qydt/201502/da730b1a55cd492d9a13b1b9ac30afa9.shtm
  6. Cohen, Saul Bernard. Geopolitics: The Geography of International Relations, 2nd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2009.Google Scholar
  7. Demko, George J. and William B. Wood. Reordering the World: Geopolitical Perspectives on the 21 st Century. Boulder: Westview Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. Goldstein, Judith and Robert O. Keohane. “Ideas and Foreign Policy: an Analysis Framework,” In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, edited by Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane, 3-30. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  9. Grieco, Joseph. “Anarchy and Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism,” In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: the Contemporary Debate, ed. David A. Baldwin, 116–142 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  10. Jongwanich, Juthathip et al. “Trade Structure and the Transmission of Economic Distress in the High Income OECD Countries to Developing Asia.” ADB Economics Working Paper Series no. 161 (2009). http://www.adb.org/sites/defult/files/pub2009/Economics-WP161.
  11. Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  12. Li, Xiangyang. “On the Diversified Cooperation Mechanisms of Maritime Silk Road,” World Economics and Politics, 35, no. 11 (2014): 4–17.Google Scholar
  13. Lin Guangliang, Ye Zhengjia, and Han Hua. Relations between China and SA. Beijing: Social Science Academic Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. Luttwak, Edward N. “The Theory and Practice of Geo-Economics,” In The International System after the Collapse of the East-West Order, edited by Armand Clesse et al. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. Mehta, Pratap Bhanu. “Sovereignty Tradeoffs and Regional Integration: Theoretical and Comparative Reflections,” In International Relations Theory and South Asia vol. I, edited by E. Sridharan. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  16. Mishra, Ruhal. “What China Must do to get India on Silk Route,” 2014. http://www.rediff.com/news.
  17. Park, Doughyun and Kwanho Shin. “Can Trade with the People’s Republic of China Be an Engine of Growth for Developing Asia?” ADB Economics Working Paper Series no.172 (2009). http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/pub/2009/Economics-WP172.
  18. Pei, Jianzhang, ed. The History of Diplomacy of China: 1949–1956. Beijing: World Affairs Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  19. Pehrson, Christopher J. “String of Pearls: Meeting the challenge of China’s rising power across the Asian littoral.” The Strategic Studies Institute (2006).Google Scholar
  20. People’s Republic of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ministry of Commerce. “Vision and Proposed Actions Outlined on Jointly Building OBOR,” 2015. http://www.sdpc.gov.cn/gzdt/201503/t2015328_669091.html.
  21. Ramachandran, Sudha. “China Moves into India’s Backyard,” Asia Times, March 13, 2007. http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/IC13Df01.html.
  22. Ravenhill, John. “The Study of Global Political Economy,” In Global Political Economy, 4th ed., edited by John Ravenhill. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  23. Ruggie, John Gerald. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” In International Regimes, edited by Stephen D. Krasner. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  24. Schelling, Thomas C. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  25. Shambaugh, David. China Goes Global: the Partial Power. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, Adam. An Inquiry onto the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House, 1937.Google Scholar
  27. Srivastava, Pradeep. “Regional Corridors Development in Regional Cooperation.” ADB Economics Working Paper Series, No. 258 (2011). http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/pub/2011/Economics-WP258.pdf.
  28. E. Sridharan, “International Relations Theory and SA: Security, Political Economy, Domestic Politics, Identities, and Images,” In International Relations theory and South Asia, Vol. I, edited by E. Sridharan. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  29. Strange, Susan. States and Market: An Introduction to the International Political Economy. London: Pinter Publishers Ltd, 1988.Google Scholar
  30. Sui, Xinmin. “India’s Strategic Culture and Model of International Behavior.” China International Studies, 45, no. 2 (2014): 139–162.Google Scholar
  31. Sun, Shihai, ed. South Asia: Politics, International Relations, and Security. Beijing: China Social Sciences Publishing House, 1998.Google Scholar
  32. Wang, Taiping, ed. The History of Diplomacy of China: 1957–1969. Beijing: World Affairs Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  33. Wang Taiping, ed., The History of Diplomacy of China: 1970–1978. Beijing: World Affairs Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  34. World Bank. South Asia: Growth and Regional Integration 2006. Washington, D.C.: 2006.Google Scholar
  35. Xi, Jinping. The Governance of China. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press Co. Ltd., 2014.Google Scholar
  36. Xi, Jinping. “Towards a Community of Common Destiny and a New Future for Asia.” Keynote speech delivered at the 2015 Bo’ao Forum for Asia Annual Conference, 2015. http://www.en84.com/nonfiction/remarks/201503/000161043.html.
  37. Ye Hai-lin. “Does China Need India’s Participation in MSR?” 2015., http://www.thepaper.cn/newsdetail_fora=ward_1295387.
  38. Zhang Li. “China’s Diplomacy of South Asian and Kashmir Dispute,” South Asia Studies Quarterly, 22, no. 1 (2006): 42–43.Google Scholar
  39. Zhao Gancheng. “On OBOR Strategy from South Asia Perspective and India’s Choice,” The Contemporary World, no. 6 (2015): 20–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xinmin Sui
    • 1
  1. 1.Zhongyuan University of TechnologyZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations