EMBEC 2017, NBC 2017: EMBEC & NBC 2017 pp 109-112 | Cite as
Ultrasound despeckling based on Non Local Means
Abstract
Ultrasound images are characterized by speckle, a multiplicative noise that degrades their quality. In the last decades, several efforts have been done for developing effective denoising filters able to provide effective signal regularization and noise preservation. Recently, the so-called Non Local Mean approaches have proven to be well suited for such kind of problems. Within this manuscript, a new despeckling filter for ultrasound data is presented, developed in the Non Local Mean framework that jointly exploits several acquired video frames for reducing speckle. The main novelty consists in the metric adopted for the evaluation of patches similarity, which is based on the statistical properties of the acquired data. More in detail, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance between the cumulative distribution functions of the involved pixels, computed on the available frames, is evaluated. The method has been tested on simulated data and compared to other state of art despeckling filters belonging to different families, showing interesting performances in combining good details preservation with effective noise reduction.
Keywords
Ultrasound image despeckling Non Local Means Statistical estimationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Burckhart C. B.. Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans IEEE Trans. on Sonics and Ultrasonics. 1983;30:156-163.Google Scholar
- 2.Joel, T., Sivakumar, R.. Despeckling of Ultrasound Medical Images: ASurvey Journal of Image and Graphics. 2013;1:161–165.Google Scholar
- 3.Ambrosanio M., Baselice F., Ferraioli G., Pascazio V., Schirinzi G.. Enhanced Wiener filter for ultrasound image restorationyComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2017;underreview.Google Scholar
- 4.Yahya, N., Kamel, N.S., Malik, A.S.. Subspace-based technique for speckle noise reduction in ultrasound images BioMedical EngineeringOnLine. 2014;13:154.Google Scholar
- 5.Buades, A., Coll, B., Morel, J.M.. Image Denoising Methods. A NewNonlocal Principle SIAM Review. 2010;52:113–147.Google Scholar
- 6.Katkovnik Vladimir, Foi Alessandro, Egiazarian Karen, Astola Jaakko. From Local Kernel to Nonlocal Multiple-Model Image Denoising International Journal of Computer Vision. 2009;86:1.Google Scholar
- 7.Foi Alessandro, Boracchi Giacomo, Foveated Nonlocal Self-Similarity International Journal of Computer Vision. 2016;120:78–110.Google Scholar
- 8.Massey, F.J.. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1951;46:68–78.Google Scholar
- 9.Buades A., Coll B., Morel J.-M.. A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one IAM Journal on Multiscale Modeling and Simulation: A SIAM Interdisciplinary Journal. 2005;4:490–530.Google Scholar
- 10.Tasdizen, T.: Principal Neighborhood Dictionaries for Nonlocal Means Image Denoising IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2009;18:2649–2660.Google Scholar
- 11.Dai, L., Zhang, Y., Li, Y.. BM3D Image Denoising Algorithm with Adaptive Distance Hard-threshold International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition. 2013;6:41–50.Google Scholar
- 12.Pierazzo N., Lebrun M., Rais M. E., Morel J. M., Facciolo G.. Non-local dual image denoising in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP):813-817 2014.Google Scholar
- 13.Jensen, J.A., Svendsen, N.B.. Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics. Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control. 1992;39:262–267.Google Scholar
- 14.Baselice, F., Ferraioli, G., Pascazio, V.. A 3D MRI denoising algorithm based on Bayesian theory. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 2017;16:25.Google Scholar
- 15.Baselice, F., Ferraioli, G., Pascazio, V., Sorriso, A.. Bayesian MRI denoising in complex domain Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2017;38:112–122.Google Scholar
- 16.Coupe, P., Hellier, P., Kervrann, C., Barillot, C.. Nonlocal Means-Based Speckle Filtering for Ultrasound Images IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2009;18:2221–2229.Google Scholar
- 17.Yu Yongjian, Acton S. T.. Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2002,11:1260–1270.Google Scholar
- 18.Tay P. C., Acton S. T., Hossack J. A.. Ultrasound Despeckling Using an Adaptive Window Stochastic Approach in 2006 International Conference on Image Processing:2549-2552 2006.Google Scholar