EMBEC 2017, NBC 2017: EMBEC & NBC 2017 pp 109-112 | Cite as

Ultrasound despeckling based on Non Local Means

  • Michele Ambrosanio
  • Fabio Baselice
  • Giampaolo Ferraioli
  • Vito Pascazio
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 65)

Abstract

Ultrasound images are characterized by speckle, a multiplicative noise that degrades their quality. In the last decades, several efforts have been done for developing effective denoising filters able to provide effective signal regularization and noise preservation. Recently, the so-called Non Local Mean approaches have proven to be well suited for such kind of problems. Within this manuscript, a new despeckling filter for ultrasound data is presented, developed in the Non Local Mean framework that jointly exploits several acquired video frames for reducing speckle. The main novelty consists in the metric adopted for the evaluation of patches similarity, which is based on the statistical properties of the acquired data. More in detail, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance between the cumulative distribution functions of the involved pixels, computed on the available frames, is evaluated. The method has been tested on simulated data and compared to other state of art despeckling filters belonging to different families, showing interesting performances in combining good details preservation with effective noise reduction.

Keywords

Ultrasound image despeckling Non Local Means Statistical estimation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burckhart C. B.. Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans IEEE Trans. on Sonics and Ultrasonics. 1983;30:156-163.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Joel, T., Sivakumar, R.. Despeckling of Ultrasound Medical Images: ASurvey Journal of Image and Graphics. 2013;1:161–165.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ambrosanio M., Baselice F., Ferraioli G., Pascazio V., Schirinzi G.. Enhanced Wiener filter for ultrasound image restorationyComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2017;underreview.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yahya, N., Kamel, N.S., Malik, A.S.. Subspace-based technique for speckle noise reduction in ultrasound images BioMedical EngineeringOnLine. 2014;13:154.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buades, A., Coll, B., Morel, J.M.. Image Denoising Methods. A NewNonlocal Principle SIAM Review. 2010;52:113–147.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katkovnik Vladimir, Foi Alessandro, Egiazarian Karen, Astola Jaakko. From Local Kernel to Nonlocal Multiple-Model Image Denoising International Journal of Computer Vision. 2009;86:1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foi Alessandro, Boracchi Giacomo, Foveated Nonlocal Self-Similarity International Journal of Computer Vision. 2016;120:78–110.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Massey, F.J.. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1951;46:68–78.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buades A., Coll B., Morel J.-M.. A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one IAM Journal on Multiscale Modeling and Simulation: A SIAM Interdisciplinary Journal. 2005;4:490–530.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tasdizen, T.: Principal Neighborhood Dictionaries for Nonlocal Means Image Denoising IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2009;18:2649–2660.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dai, L., Zhang, Y., Li, Y.. BM3D Image Denoising Algorithm with Adaptive Distance Hard-threshold International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition. 2013;6:41–50.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pierazzo N., Lebrun M., Rais M. E., Morel J. M., Facciolo G.. Non-local dual image denoising in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP):813-817 2014.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jensen, J.A., Svendsen, N.B.. Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics. Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control. 1992;39:262–267.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baselice, F., Ferraioli, G., Pascazio, V.. A 3D MRI denoising algorithm based on Bayesian theory. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 2017;16:25.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baselice, F., Ferraioli, G., Pascazio, V., Sorriso, A.. Bayesian MRI denoising in complex domain Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2017;38:112–122.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coupe, P., Hellier, P., Kervrann, C., Barillot, C.. Nonlocal Means-Based Speckle Filtering for Ultrasound Images IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2009;18:2221–2229.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu Yongjian, Acton S. T.. Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2002,11:1260–1270.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tay P. C., Acton S. T., Hossack J. A.. Ultrasound Despeckling Using an Adaptive Window Stochastic Approach in 2006 International Conference on Image Processing:2549-2552 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Ambrosanio
    • 1
  • Fabio Baselice
    • 1
  • Giampaolo Ferraioli
    • 2
  • Vito Pascazio
    • 1
  1. 1.Università degli Studi di Napoli Parthenope, Dipartimento di IngegneriaNapoliItaly
  2. 2.Università degli Studi di Napoli Parthenope, Dipartimento di Scienze e TecnologieNapoliItaly

Personalised recommendations