Liability and Regulatory Aspects of Nuclear Energy Promotion in South Asia

  • M. P. Ram MohanEmail author


South Asia (SAARC) represents an interesting region to anyone who follows nuclear energy development. Out of the four Non-“Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty” States, two are in South Asia—India and Pakistan, both having civilian nuclear energy and weapons programmes. Apart from these two countries, Bangladesh has recently initiated setting up nuclear energy, and Sri Lanka is contemplating on the possible options. International Atomic Energy Agency has predicted that Asia will drive the nuclear energy growth worldwide, and in it South Asia remains an important element. South Asian countries are pursuing the civilian nuclear energy programme, even though it remains an option which is linked to international legal and regulatory scrutiny and compliance on security and safety, on the hope that in the long run nuclear power will be economically viable, less volatile than conventional fossil fuels which is currently imported draining massive foreign reserves, and above all environmentally friendly. The thrust towards nuclear power especially in SAARC has to be seen in this context. The chapter provides background of nuclear energy programmes in South Asia, tracks the legal, liability and regulatory regimes that are in compliance with international law, details individual countries liability and regulatory regime and concludes with a view that SAARC should work with a common approach with respect to nuclear safety and security.


Nuclear energy in South Asia Nuclear liability and regulation SAARC Nuclear risk assessment 



I am thankful to Akshay Shandilya, LL.M student at TERI University for providing extensive research support towards completing the paper.


  1. Agreement. (2016). Agreement between the Republic of India and the democratic socialist Republic of Sri Lanka on cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Accessed September 6, 2016.
  2. Asaduzzaman, K. M., & Akbar, M. S. (2015). National nuclear power programme of Bangladesh. Technical Meeting on Topical Issues in the Development of Nuclear Power Infrastructure. Vienna: IAEA. Accessed September 10, 2016.
  3. Bangladesh. (2011). Power system master plan 2010. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. Table 8–19.Google Scholar
  4. Bangladesh. (2015). Statement by H.E. Mr. M. Shameem Ahsan. In Review Conference of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).Google Scholar
  5. Basrur, R., Chang, Y., & Koh, S. L. C. (2015). Nuclear energy in Asia: The end of a Renaissance? In P. G. Harris & G. Lang (Eds.), Routledge handbook of environment and society in Asia (pp. 423–438). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. BSCAL. (1997). India Opposes Classification of Spent Fuel as Nuclear Waste. Business Standard. Accessed September 8, 2016.
  7. C&AG. (2012). Performance audit of the activities of atomic energy regulatory board for the year ended March 2012. Report No. 9. Accessed September 11, 2016.
  8. Chaudhury, D. R. (2016). US firm westinghouse likely to shift its nuclear plant site plan from Gujarat to Andhra Pradesh. The Economic Times. Accessed August 20, 2016.
  9. Chidambaram, R. (2006). India and the international atomic energy agency. Atoms for Peace: An International Journal, 1(2/3).Google Scholar
  10. Choudhury, N. (2016). Preparing to license the RNPP site licence and construction licence—Nuclear regulatory status of BAERA considering IAEA 19 infrastructure issues [NG-G-3.1 (Rev. 1)]. Vienna: IAEA. Accessed September 10, 2016.
  11. CLND. (2010). The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act. Act No. 38 of 2010.Google Scholar
  12. Convention on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency. (1986). INFCIRC/336.Google Scholar
  13. Convention on Early Notification of Nuclear Accident. (1986). INFCIRC/335.Google Scholar
  14. Convention on Nuclear Safety. (1994). INFCIRC/449.Google Scholar
  15. Declarations/Reservations. (2016a). Convention on early notification of a nuclear accident. IAEA. Accessed September 2, 2016.
  16. Declarations/Reservations. (2016b). Convention on assistance in the case of a nuclear accident or radiological emergency. IAEA.Google Scholar
  17. Dyck, E. (2016). IAEA reviews progress of Bangladesh’s nuclear infrastructure development. IAEA. Accessed September 5, 2016.
  18. Grover, R. B. (2016). Opening up of international civil nuclear cooperation with India and related developments. Progress in Nuclear Energy. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.09.016.
  19. IAEA. (2008). Statement on civil nuclear cooperation with India. INFCIRC/734.Google Scholar
  20. IAEA. (2009b). Responsibilities and capabilities of a nuclear energy programme implementing organization. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NG-T-3.6. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
  21. IAEA. (2013). Progress in building Bangladesh’s nuclear infrastructure. Accessed August 4, 2016.
  22. IAEA. (2014a). International status and prospects for nuclear power 2014. Report by the Director General of the IAEA. GOV/INF/2014/13-GC(58)/INF/6.Google Scholar
  23. IAEA. (2014b). Developing infrastructure for new nuclear programmes. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
  24. IAEA. (2014c). IAEA mission concludes peer review of Pakistan’s nuclear regulatory framework. Accessed August 10, 2016.
  25. IAEA. (2015). Report of the integrated regulatory review service (IRRS) mission to India. Accessed September 5, 2016.
  26. IAEA. (2016). Nepal signs a country programme framework (CPF) for 2016–2021.…/03022016_nepal.html. Accessed September 1, 2016.
  27. India. (1988). Declaration of the republic of India made upon expressing consent to be bound by the convention on early notification of a nuclear accident.Google Scholar
  28. INLEX. (2016). Civil liability for nuclear damage: Advantages and disadvantages of joining the international nuclear. International Expert Group on Nuclear Liability. Accessed August 31, 2016.
  29. Iqbal, A. (2015). Pakistan will not sign NPT, says foreign secy. Dawn. Accessed September 2, 2016.
  30. Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management. (1997). INFCIRC/546.Google Scholar
  31. Joint Statement. (2016). India-France Joint Statement on the occasion of the State Visit of President Francois Hollande of the French Republic to India.Google Scholar
  32. Kazmi, Z. (2014). Pakistan’s energy security. The Express Tribune. Accessed September 10, 2016.
  33. Koley, J., Harikumar, S., Ashraf, S. A. H., Chande, S. K., & Sharma, S. K. (2006). Regulatory practices for nuclear power plants in India. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 236(7–8), 894–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kollar, L. (2016). Asia’s prospects for nuclear power highlighted at regional conference. IAEA. Accessed September 1, 2016.
  35. Lok Sabha. (2013). Question No. 544. Monsoon Session. Accessed September 12, 2016.
  36. Lok Sabha. (2016a). Question No. 1078. Budget Session. Accessed September 12, 2016.
  37. Lok Sabha. (2016b). Question No. 2784. Monsoon Session. Accessed September 12, 2016.
  38. Lok Sabha. (2016c). Question No. 1762. Budget Session. Accessed September 12, 2016.
  39. Mahmood, T. (1995). Nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT): Pakistan and India. Pakistan Horizon, 48(3), 81–100.Google Scholar
  40. MEA. (2015). Frequently Asked Questions and Answers on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act 2010 and Related Issues. Ministry of External Affairs—India. Accessed August 2, 2016.
  41. MoST. (2011). Report of the National Workshop on Application of Nuclear Technology in Nepal. Jointly organized by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Nepal, and Pokhara University.Google Scholar
  42. Mustafa, G. (2012). Prospects of nuclear power in Pakistan. INPRO Dialogue Forum on Global Nuclear Energy Sustainability Long-Term Prospects for Nuclear Energy in the Post Fukushima Era. Seoul: IAEA.,_28.08.2012/1110-1230(National_Perspective)/6._Ghulam_Mustafa_Pakistan_0828.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2016.
  43. NEA. (2003). Case study 2—Nuclear accidents. In Emerging Risks in the 21st Century: An Agenda for Action, OECD, 203–204.Google Scholar
  44. NEA. (2013). Strategic aspects of nuclear and radiological emergency management. OECD. Accessed September 1, 2016.
  45. Nepal. (2007). National Nuclear Policy (2064).Google Scholar
  46. NEPRA. (2015). State of Industry Report.Google Scholar
  47. NSRA. (2011). Nuclear Safety Regulatory Authority Bill.Google Scholar
  48. PAC. (2013). Activities of atomic energy regulatory board. Public Accounts Committee. Accessed September 11, 2016.
  49. Parameswaran, P. (2015). China confirms Pakistan nuclear projects. The Diplomat. Accessed September 11, 2016.
  50. Paul, D. (2013). Current status of the radioactive waste management, issues to be overcome, and the way forward to access the JC. Regional Workshop on the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management. Seoul: IAEA. Accessed September 11, 2016.
  51. Pelzer, N. (2011). The Indian Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010—Legislation with Flaws?. atw—International Journal for Nuclear Power 56(1): 1–9. Accessed September 8, 2016.
  52. PIB. (2016). Launching of nuclear insurance pool. Press Information Bureau. Accessed August 2, 2016.
  53. Planning Commission. (2012). Perspective plan of Bangladesh 2010-202: Making vision 2021 a reality. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  54. PNRA. (2016). Regulatory framework. Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority. Accessed September 5, 2016.
  55. PRIS. (2016). Power reactor information system. IAEA.Google Scholar
  56. Quadir, S. (2015). Bangladesh signs $12.65 billion deal with Russia for nuclear power plants. Reuters. Accessed September 14, 2016.
  57. Ram Mohan, M. P. (2015). Nuclear energy and liability in South Asia: Institutions, legal frameworks and risk assessment within SAARC. New Delhi: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ram Mohan, M. P., & Kini, E. R. (2015). India’s nuclear regulators have been audited. Hindu Business Line. Accessed September 7, 2016.
  59. Ram Mohan, M. P., Raju, K. D., & Shiju, M. V. (2013). A nuclear liability framework for South Asia: Formation of South Asia association for regional cooperation (SAARC) nuclear risk community. International Journal of Nuclear Law, 4(1), 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ram Mohan, M. P., & Shandilya, A. (2014). Nuclear energy and risk assessment by Indian Courts: Analysis of judicial intervention in the Kudankulam nuclear power project. Journal of Risk Research, 18(8), 1051–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rasel, A. R. (2016). Rooppur nuclear power plant gets tax exemption. Dhaka Tribune. Accessed September 14, 2016.
  62. RevCon. (2015). Joint statement on the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons. 2015 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.Google Scholar
  63. Sasi, A. (2016). Jaitapur nuclear project: Renewed push, amid lingering concerns. The Indian Express. Accessed September 12, 2016.
  64. Simon, D. (2004). Article VI of the non-proliferation treaty is a pactum de contrahendo and has serious legal obligation by implication. Journal of International Law & Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Vol 12, 1–19.Google Scholar
  65. Sri Lanka. (2014). Country specific framework 2014–2018. Government of Sri Lanka. Accessed September 2, 2016.
  66. Standing Committee. (2012) 221st report on the nuclear safety regulatory authority bill, 2011. Department related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science and Technology, Environmental and Forests.Google Scholar
  67. Stephenson, J., & Tynan, P. (2009). Is nuclear power Pakistan’s best energy investment? Assessing Pakistan’s electricity situation. In Henry D. Sokolski (Ed.), Pakistan’s Nuclear Future: Reining in the Risk (pp. 103–130). U.S. Army War College: Strategic Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  68. Stoiber, C., Baer, A., Pelzer, N., & Tonhauser, W. (2003). Handbook on nuclear law. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
  69. Tonhauser, W., & Jankowitsch-Prevor, O. (1997). Joint convention on the safety of spent fuel management and on the safety of radioactive waste management. Nuclear Law Bulletin, 60, 9–22.Google Scholar
  70. Tonhauser, W., & Quevenco, R. (2015). Towards a better understanding of civil liability for nuclear damage: Learning the fine points of the international legal regime. IAEA. Accessed September 10, 2016.
  71. World Nuclear Association. (2016). Nuclear power in Pakistan. World Nuclear Association. Accessed September 8, 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of ManagementAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations