Skip to main content

Resurgence of Nuclear Power in India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Resurgence of Nuclear Power
  • 471 Accesses

Abstract

Considering the rising expectations of its youthful population and trends of growth in electricity demand in the past one decade or so, a per capita consumption of 5000 kWh per year by the middle of this century will need to be planned for in India . With population likely to rise to about 1.6 billion people, and losses from transmission and distribution brought down to the global average of about 7%, total demand for electricity in India will be about 8600 TWh per year by the middle of this century. This chapter examines supply options based on multiple considerations, including resource sustainability and economics, and establishes that nuclear power will have to be a significant component of India’s electricity mix. This chapter goes on to list the initiatives of the Government to accelerate the growth in installed nuclear capacity, and also the programmes of the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) aimed at development of technologies so that India, over time measured in short decades, is able to utilise the full energy potential of domestic as well as imported uranium and, in the long run, move on to exploit thorium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Utilities are undertakings whose primary purpose is production, transmission and distribution of electric energy. These could be public sector undertakings, private companies, cooperative organisations, local or regional authorities or governmental organisations.

  2. 2.

    A non-utility is an independent power producer, which is not a public utility, owning facilities to generate electric power for sale to utilities and end users. Non-utilities may be privately held facilities, corporations, cooperatives, such as rural solar or wind energy producers, and non-energy industrial concerns having capacity to feed excess energy into the grid.

  3. 3.

    1 kWh = 860.421 kcal; 1 kcal = 4.184 kJ.

  4. 4.

    1 toe = 10 million kcal.

  5. 5.

    Lignite is also used in India for the generation of electricity . To keep the argument simple, lignite resources, etc., are not included in the narrative here.

  6. 6.

    The IESS, 2047, has been developed expressly as an energy scenario building tool. The guiding ambition of IESS is to develop energy pathways leading up to the year 2047, comprising likely energy demand and supply scenarios. The data relating to implications—energy security, costs, land and carbon dioxide emissions—are merely indicative and not firm estimates. Therefore, this is a scenario building exercise and not strictly an energy model.

  7. 7.

    Hydro-electricity production and electricity produced by other non-thermal means (wind, tide/wave/ocean, photovoltaic, etc.) are accounted for by using 1 TWh  = 0.086 Mtoe. However, the primary energy equivalent of nuclear electricity is calculated from the gross generation by assuming a 33% conversion efficiency, i.e. 1 TWh = 0.086–0.33 Mtoe.

  8. 8.

    It assumes that uranium is enriched in a plant operating on centrifuge technology. In case diffusion technology is used, EROI comes down to 75.

  9. 9.

    Bhandari et al. convert all energy invested and output to primary energy equivalent by using primary to electrical energy conversion efficiency using average number for the country’s grid. Weisbach et al. add electrical energy and primary energy directly.

  10. 10.

    Operative reserve in a grid is the generator capacity available to the grid manager to meet demand and supply fluctuations. Intermittency of renewable sources results in large variations on supply side. Spinning reserve is the extra generation capacity that is available by increasing the output of generators that are already connected. Such a supply can come on line within seconds to minutes. Supplemental reserve is the extra generating capacity that is not currently connected and can be brought on line after a short delay. It could be from fast start generators or from an interconnected grid.

  11. 11.

    Replacement power is reserve power provided by generators requiring long start-up time, several minutes and even going to an hour. It relieves generators providing spinning and supplemental power, thereby restoring operating reserve in the grid. Intermittence of renewable implies that replacement power that is equal to installed renewable capacity has to be available and that has to come from base-load stations.

  12. 12.

    Closed fuel cycle produces minimum waste per unit of electricity generated and also ensures sustainability of uranium by using its full energy potential. Spent fuel consists of fission products and minor actinides, and uranium and plutonium. Reprocessing recovers uranium and plutonium. Minor actinides have a very long half-life, and their presence in the waste makes it necessary to store the waste for a long time. Nuclear waste can be partitioned, a process that separates minor actinides from the waste. The remaining waste then would require storage for a period of about 300 years, which is a historical time frame. Minor actinides can be fabricated into fuel and burnt in fast reactors. The process of burning is called transmutation . An engineering-scale demonstration facility for partitioning of minor actinides has been set up in India and is already working. Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR) is nearing completion, and the step remaining to solve the waste problem is to demonstrate the process of transmutation. Partitioning of waste from fast reactors will also require similar demonstration.

References

  • Berger, A., Blees, T., Breon, F. M., Brook, B. W., Hansen, P., Grover, R. B., et al. (2016). How much can nuclear energy do about global warming. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 40(1/2), 43–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswal, N. (2016). U.S. official says India has addressed nuclear concerns, as quoted by Reuters. Accessed July 6, 2016 at http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-india-nuclearpower-idUSKCN0YF2C1.

  • Bhandari, K. P., Collier, J. M., Ellingson, R. J., & Apul, D. S. (2015). Energy payback time (EPBT) and energy return on energy invested (EROI) of solar photovoltaic systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohra, S. A., & Sharma, P. D. (2006). Construction management of Indian pressurised water reactors. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 236, 836–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brook, B. W., & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2015). Key role for nuclear energy in global biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 29, 702–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEA. (2002). Preliminary ranking study of hydroelectric schemes. Accessed at http://cea.nic.in/reports/others/hydro/hpi/ranking_study/gen_report.pdf July 1, 2016.

  • CEA. (2016). Executive summary, power sector. Ministry of Power, Central Electricity Authority, March 2016. Accessed June 5, 2016 at http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/monthly/executivesummary/2016/exe_summary-03.pdf.

  • Cook, E. (1971). The flow of energy in an industrial society. Scientific American, 134–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath, D. V. (2007). Radiation effects, nuclear energy and comparative risks. Current Science, 93, 1230–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, D.R. (2016). Why it’s time to dispel the myths about nuclear power. The Guardian, April 11. Accesses on 14 July 2016 at https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2016/apr/11/time-dispel-myths-about-nuclear-power-chernobyl-fukushima.

  • Grover, R. B., & Chandra, S. (2006). Scenario for growth of electricity in India. Energy Policy, 34(2006), 2834–2847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, R. B. (2014a). Technological dimension of nuclear security. Strategic Analysis, 38(2), 151–156.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, R.B. (2014b). Nuclear power for India’s energy security: external and internal challenges. 13th Volume of India’s National Security Annual Review published by Routledge, India, 2014. ISBN 978–1-13-879638-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, R. B. (2015). The civil nuclear programme: the last decade and the outlook for near-future. Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, 10(3), 255–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, R. B. (In Press). Opening up of international civil nuclear cooperation with India and related developments. Progress in Nuclear Energy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.09.016.

  • Guilford, M. C., Hall, C. A. S., O’Connor, P., Cleveland, C. J. (2011). A new long term assessment of energy return on investment (EROI) for U.S. oil and gas discovery and production. Sustainability, 3, 1866–1887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. A. S., Lambert, J. G., & Balogh, S. B. (2014). EROI of different fuels and the implications of society. Energy Policy, 64, 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannum, W. H., Wade, D. C., Mcfarlane, H. F., & Hill, R. N. (1997). Progress in Nuclear Energy, 31(1/2), 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA. (2015). Energy, electricity and nuclear power estimates up to 2050.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2015). Key world energy statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • IESS. (2015). User guide for India’s 2047 energy calculator: large hydro sector. Accessed at http://indiaenergy.gov.in/docs/Hydro%20Power_Documentation.pdf July 1, 2016.

  • Lambert, J. G., Hall, C. A. S., Balogh, S., Gyoza, A., & Arnold, M. (2014). Energy, EROI, and quality of life. Energy Policy, 64, 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markandeya, A., & Wilkinson, P. (2007). Electricity generation and health. Lancet, 370, 979–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, I. (2010). Social development. Stanford University, Accessed June 5, 2016 at http://ianmorris.org/docs/social-development.pdf.

  • MoSPI. (2015). Energy statistics 2015, 22nd issue. Central Statistics Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission. (2006). Integrated energy policy. Report of the Expert Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasternak, A. D. (2000). Global energy futures and human development: A framework for analysis, October 2000, UCRL-ID-140773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raugei, M., & Leccisi, E. (2016). A comprehensive assessment of the energy performance of the full range of electricity technologies deployed in the United Kingdom. Energy Policy, 90, 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukhatme, S. P. (2011). Meeting India’s future needs of electricity through renewable sources (Vol. 101, pp. 624–630).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller, A. (2009). Correlation is not causation. European Nuclear Society, e-news Summer Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbach, D., Ruprecht, G., Huke, A., Czerski, K., Gottlieb, S., & Hussein, A. (2013). Energy intensities, EROI (energy returned on invested), and energy payback times of electricity generating power plants. Energy, 52, 210–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WNA. (2016). World Nuclear Performance Report 2016. World Nuclear Association, June 2016.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi B. Grover .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grover, R.B. (2017). Resurgence of Nuclear Power in India. In: Janardhanan, N., Pant, G., Grover, R. (eds) Resurgence of Nuclear Power. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5029-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5029-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5028-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5029-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics