Advertisement

Overdistended Uterus

  • Saswati Sanyal Choudhury
Chapter

Abstract

Overdistended uterus is an important cause of obstetric complications. There is overdistension of the uterus in multiple pregnancy, foetal macrosomia, hydramnios and pregnancy with uterine fibroids. USG in labour room is an essential diagnostic modality to differentiate between these conditions as well as placental localisation as placenta praevia may be associated with multiple pregnancy and fibroid. Complications of overdistension are preterm labour and preterm premature rupture of membrane with all their adverse outcomes of prematurity and high incidence of cord prolapse. The most common postpartum complication of overdistended uterus is atonic postpartum haemorrhage. Preparedness like available crossmatched blood, delivering in tertiary centre and good neonatal care units are some of prerequisites for this dangerous postpartum complication for saving lives of mother and baby.

References

  1. 1.
    Ioannou C, Papageorghiou A. Polyhydramnios. In: Arulkumaran S, Regan L, Papageorghiou AT, Monga A, Farquaharson DIM, editors. Oxford desk reference: obstetrics & gynaecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 164–5.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beall MH, Belooseky R, Ross MG. Abnormalities of amniotic fluid volume. In: James D, Steer PJ, Weiner CP, Gonik B, Crowther C, Robson S, editors. High risk pregnancy: management options. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders/Elsevier; 2011. p. 203–5.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hill LM, Breckle R, Thomas ML, Fries JK. Polyhydramnios: ultrasonically detected prevalence and neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dashe JS, McIntire DD, Ramus RM, et al. Hydramnios: anomaly prevalence and sonographic detection. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thompson O, Brown R, Gunnarson G, Harrington K. Prevalence of polyhydramnios in the third trimester in a population screened by first and second trimester ultrasonography. J Perinat Med. 1998;26:371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biggio JR Jr, Wenstrom KD, Dubard MB, Cliver SP. Hydramnios prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:773.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pri-Paz S, Khalek N, Fuchs KM, Simpson LL. Maximal amniotic fluid index as a prognostic factor in pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Piantelli G, Bedochi L, Cavicchioni O, et al. Amnioreduction for treatment of severe polyhydramnios. Acta Biomed. 2004;75(Suppl 1):56–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thilaganathan B. Multiple pregnancy. In: Arulkumaran S, Papageorghiou AT, Monga A, Farquharson DIM, editors. Oxford desk reference: obstetrics & gynaecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 158–9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    American College of Obstetrician and Gynaecologists. Shoulder dystocia. ACOG practice bulletin clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynacologists. No. 40. Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;100:1045–50.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Royal College of Obsterician & Gynaecologists (RCOG). Shoulder dystocia guideline no. 42. Green top guidelines. London: RCOG; 2005.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Katz VL, Dotters DJ, Droegemueller W. Complications of uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73:593–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Benson CB, Chow JS, Chang-Lee W, et al. Outcome of pregnancies in women with uterine leiomyomas identified by sonography in the first trimester. J Clin Ultrasound. 2001;29:261–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Winer-Muram HT, Muram D, Gillieson MS. Uterine myomas in pregnancy. J Can Assoc Radiol. 1984;35:168–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klatsky PC, Tran ND, Caughey AB, Fujimoto VY. Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:357–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vergani P, Locatelli A, Ghidini A, et al. Large uterine leiomyomata and risk of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:410–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chuang J, Tsai HW, Hwang JL. Fetal compression syndrome caused by myoma in pregnancy: a case report. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:472–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Romero R, Chervenak FA, DeVore G, et al. Fetal head deformation and congenital torticollis associated with a uterine tumor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141:839–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Phelan JP. Myomas and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 1995;22:801–5.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coronado GD, Marshall LM, Schwartz SM. Complications in pregnancy, labor, and delivery with uterine leiomyomas: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:764–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ehigiegba AE, Ande AB, Ojobo SI. Myomectomy during cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;75:21–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Buttram VC Jr, Reiter RC. Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomatology, and management. Fertil Steril. 1981;36:433–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Celik C, Acar A, Ciçek N, et al. Can myomectomy be performed during pregnancy? Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2002;53:79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wittich AC, Salminen ER, Yancey MK, Markenson GR. Myomectomy during early pregnancy. Mil Med. 2000;165:162–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu WM, Wang PH, Tang WL, et al. Uterine artery ligation for treatment of pregnant women with uterine leiomyomas who are undergoing cesarean section. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:423–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pron G, Mocarski E, Bennett J, et al. Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: the Ontario multicenter trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saswati Sanyal Choudhury
    • 1
  1. 1.Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed Medical CollegeBarpetaIndia

Personalised recommendations