Advertisement

Spatial Interactions of Electrically Evoked Potentials in Visual Cortex Induced by Multi-retinal Electrical Stimulation in Rats

  • Hui Xie
  • Yi Wang
  • Leanne Lai-Hang ChanEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 64)

Abstract

Retinal prostheses are designed to electrically stimulate retinal neurons to generate artificial vision in patients with degenerative diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa (RP) or age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Considering hundreds of microelectrodes may be applied in the future retinal prosthesis to provide enough spatial information for precise perception, it is crucial to investigate the spatial properties of the visual cortex in response to retinal electric stimulation via in vivo studies, especially in multi-stimulating manner by adjacent electrodes. In this study, we use retinal multi-stimulating electrodes to stimulate retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and record electrically evoked potentials (EEPs) in contralateral visual cortex by a 32-channel Utah array. The threshold of eliciting current for EEPs was determined with 20% of the maximum response in visual cortex. The spatial map with 32 grids for single retinal stimulation was obtained firstly, which showed the different spatial distribution to different retinal stimulation. Then the combination of two stimulation from two adjacent retinal stimulating electrode was applied to examine the spatial responses of visual cortex.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The work described in this paper was supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China, through Project CityU 123412 and also supported by Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program (No. 2013S046) and Shenzhen Peacock Plan.

References

  1. 1.
    Hartong, D.T., E.L. Berson, and T.P. Dryja, Retinitis pigmentosa. Lancet, 2006. 368(9549): p. 1795–1809.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lim, L.S., et al., Age-related macular degeneration. Lancet, 2012. 379(9827): p. 1728–1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tochitsky, I. and R.H. Kramer, Optopharmacological tools for restoring visual function in degenerative retinal diseases. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2015. 34C: p. 74–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Santos, A., et al., Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. Arch Ophthalmol, 1997. 115(4): p. 511–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Humayun, M.S., et al., Morphometric analysis of the extramacular retina from postmortem eyes with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1999. 40(1): p. 143–148.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, S.Y., et al., Morphometric analysis of the macula in eyes with disciform age-related macular degeneration. Retina, 2002. 22(4): p. 471–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weiland, J.D., W. Liu, and M.S. Humayun, Retinal prosthesis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 2005. p:7. 361–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weiland, J.D., A.K. Cho, and M.S. Humayun, Retinal prostheses: current clinical results and future needs. Ophthalmology, 2011. 118(11): p. 2227–2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ryu, S.B., et al., Temporal response properties of retinal ganglion cells in rd1 mice evoked by amplitude-modulated electrical pulse trains. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010. 51(12): p. 6762–6769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tsai, D., et al., Direct activation and temporal response properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells following subretinal stimulation. J Neurophysiol, 2009. 102(5): p. 2982–2993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chan, L.L., et al., Both electrical stimulation thresholds and SMI-32-immunoreactive retinal ganglion cell density correlate with age in S334ter line 3 rat retina. J Neurophysiol, 2011. 105(6): p. 2687–2697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elfar, S.D., et al., A cortical (V1) neurophysiological recording model for assessing the efficacy of retinal visual prostheses. J Neurosci Methods, 2009. 180(2): p. 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun, J., et al., Spatiotemporal properties of multipeaked electrically evoked potentials elicited by penetrative optic nerve stimulation in rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010. 52(1): p. 146–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zrenner, E., et al., Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words. Proc Biol Sci, 2010. 278(1711): p. 1489–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rizzo, J.F., 3rd, et al., Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2003. 44(12): p. 5362–5369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Humayun, M.S., et al., Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res, 2003. 43(24): p. 2573–2581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perez Fornos, A., et al., Temporal properties of visual perception on electrical stimulation of the retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012. 53(6): p. 2720–2731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fried, S.I., H.A. Hsueh, and F.S. Werblin, A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. J Neurophysiol, 2006. 95(2): p. 970–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sekirnjak, C., et al., High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design. J Neurosci, 2008. 28(17): p. 4446–4456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barry, M.P. and G. Dagnelie, Use of the Argus II retinal prosthesis to improve visual guidance of fine hand movements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2012. 53(9): p. 5095–5101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sekirnjak, C., et al., Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. J Neurophysiol, 2006. 95(6): p. 3311–3327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stett, A., A. Mai, and T. Herrmann, Retinal charge sensitivity and spatial discrimination obtainable by subretinal implants: key lessons learned from isolated chicken retina. J Neural Eng, 2007. 4(1): p. S7–S16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ray, A., et al., Impedance as a method to sense proximity at the electrode-retina interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2011. 19(6): p. 696–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronic EngineeringCity University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina

Personalised recommendations