The Thumb pp 27-80 | Cite as

Duplicated Thumb and Secondary Deformity

  • Sang Hyun Woo
  • Young Seok Lee


Duplicated thumb is a common, often sporadic, congenital anomaly that must be addressed surgically early in life. Classification, operation timing, and methods of anesthesia of the initial surgery are determined by not only simple radiograph but also by ultrasonography and MRI. Ideally, the surgeon seeks to accomplish three goals: construction of a thumb that is adequate in size, preservation of pinch function, and reconstruction of all components in one procedure. The author discusses the various classification systems, procedures, and outcomes after primary surgery for duplicated thumbs as well as secondary correction of the previously reconstructed duplicated thumbs.


Duplicated thumb Secondary correction MRI 


  1. 1.
    Jobe MT. Congenital anomalies of the hand. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH, editors. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2008. p. 4367–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldfarb CA, Wall LB, Bohn DC, Moen BA, Van Heest AE. Epidemiology of congenital upper limb anomalies in a Midwest United States population: an assessment using the Oberg, Manske, and Tonkin classification. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:127–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swanson AB, Swanson GD, Tada K. A classification for congenital limb malformation. J Hand Surg Am. 1983;8:693–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wassel HD. The results of surgery for polydactyly of the thumb. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969;64:175–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manske MC, Kennedy CD, Huang JI. Classifications in brief: the Wassel classification for radial polydactyly. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:1740–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dijkman RR, van Nieuwenhoven CA, Selles RW, et al. A multicenter comparative study of two classification system for radial polydactyly. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:991–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chung MS, Baek GH, Gong HS, Lee HJ, Kim J, Rhee SH. Radial polydactyly: proposal for a new classification system based on the 159 duplicated thumbs. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33:190–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zuidam JM, Selles RW, Ananta M, Runia J, Hovius SE. A classification system of radial polydactyly: inclusion of triphalangeal thumb and triplication. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:373–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Upton J, Hergrueter C. Congenital anomalies of the hand. In: Cohen M, editor. Mastery of plastic and reconstructive surgery, vol. 3. Boston/New York: Little, Brown; 1994. p. 1424–53.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dobyns JH, Lipscomb PR, Cooney WP. Management of thumb duplication. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;195:26–44.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tonkin MA, Bulstrode NW. The Bilhaut-Cloquet procedure for Wassel types III, IV and VII thumb duplication. J Hand Surg. 2007;32B:684–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baek GH, Gong HS, Chung MS, Oh JH, Lee YH, Lee SK. Modified Bilhaut-Cloquet procedure for Wassel type-II and III polydactyly of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89A:534–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manske PR. Treatment of duplicated thumb using a ligamentous/periosteal flap. J Hand Surg. 1989;14A:728–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horii E, Hattori T, Koh S, Majima M. Reconstruction for Wassel type III radial polydactyly with two digits equal in size. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:1802–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shen K, Wang Z, Xu Y. Reconstruction of Wassel type VI radial polydactyly with Triphalangeal thumb using an on-top osteotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1216–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bell B, Butler L, Mills J, Stutz C, Ezaki M, Oishi S. “On-Top Plasty” for radial polydactyly reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42:753.e1–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saito S, Ueda M, Takahashi N, Kawakatsu M, Suzuki S. Three-dimensional ultrasonography for visualization of muscular anomalies in type VI and VII radial polydactyly. Skelet Radiol. 2016;45:541–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen MS. Thumb duplication. Hand Clin. 1998;14:17–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mih AD. Complications of duplicate thumb reconstruction. Hand Clin. 1998;14:143–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tada K, Yonenobu K, Tsuyuguchi Y, et al. Duplication of the thumb. A retrospective review of two hundred and thirty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:584–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stutz C, Mills J, Wheeler L, et al. Long-term outcomes following radial polydactyly reconstruction. J Hand Surg. 2014;39:1549–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ogino T, Ishii S, Takahata S, Kato H. Long-term results of surgical treatment of thumb polydactyly. J Hand Surg. 1996;21A:478–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Larsen M, Nicolai JP. Long-term follow-up of surgical treatment for thumb duplication. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30:276–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goldfarb CA, Patterson JM, Maender A, et al. Thumb size and appearance following reconstruction of radial polydactyly. J Hand Surg. 2008;33:1348–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kawabata H, Tada K, Masada K, Kawai H, Ono K. Revision of residual deformities after operations for duplication of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:988–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kawabata H, Masatomi T, Shimada K, Kawai H, Tada K. Treatment of residual instability and extensor lag in polydactyly of the thumb. J Hand Surg Br. 1993;18:5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sang Hyun Woo
    • 1
  • Young Seok Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.W Institute for Hand and Reconstructive MicrosurgeryW HospitalDaeguSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations