Advertisement

Becoming Professionally Agentic: Researching Pedagogical Reasoning in Initial Teacher Education

  • Jenny MartinEmail author
  • Stephen Keast
  • Lucy Anders
Chapter

Abstract

This research is concerned with the issue of providing effective initial teacher education (ITE) in contemporary times of rapidly changing technologies, increasing student diversity and pressing global problems. Being an effective teacher in a contemporary sense requires more ingenuity, agency and critical awareness than ever before. The chapter provides a discussion of developing preservice teachers’ pedagogical reasoning in ITE at two different sites, drawing on recent research and current initiatives to develop preservice teachers’ professional agency and in relation to policy requirements for the demonstration of graduate competence against professional standards. The authors introduce narratives of practice in ITE constructed from data related to initiatives positioning preservice teachers as responsible for pedagogical decision-making at two specific, separate sites. The chapter highlights the importance of a focus on preservice teachers’ professional agency in evaluations of success in ITE.

Keywords

Preservice Teacher Experienced Teacher Science Lesson Initial Teacher Education Pedagogical Reasoning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arnold, J. L. (2012). Addressing the balance of agency in science classrooms. Ph.D., The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2014a). Professional standards for teachers. http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list
  3. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2014b). Strengthening teacher accreditation programs. http://www.aitsl.edu.au/initial-teacher-education/ite-reform/accreditation
  4. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards, A. (2015). Recognising and realising teachers’ professional agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 779–784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044333.
  6. Edwards, A. (In Press). The dialectics of person and practice: How cultural-historical accounts of agency can inform teacher education. In J. Clandinen, J. Husu (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher education. SAGE.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, A. (Personal communication). 22nd February 2016. CHAT reading group Feb meeting.Google Scholar
  8. Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). The dynamics of social episodes. In R. Harre and L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action.  Oxford: Blackwell, 1–13.Google Scholar
  10. Hoyrup, S. (2004). Reflection as a core process in organizational learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 442–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson, B., Down, B., Le Cornu, R., Peters, J., Sullivan, A., Pearce, J., et al. (2012). Early career teachers: Stories of resilience. Adelaide, SA: University of South Australia.Google Scholar
  12. Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2012). New learning: Elements of a Science of Education (Second edn.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kayi-Aydar, H. (2015). Teacher agency, positioning, and English language learners: Voices of pre-service classroom teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keast, S., & Anders, L. (2016). Exploring preservice teachers’ pedagogical reasoning: A pilot study. Paper presented at the XVI Conference of the International Organisation for Science and Technology Education (IOSTE). Braga, Portugal.Google Scholar
  15. Keast, S., Mitchell, I., Panizzon, D., Loughran, J., Tham, M., & Rutherford, L. (In Press). Pinball reasoning: New insights into teachers’ pedagogical reasoning. Teaching and Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  16. Ketelaar, E., Beijaard, D., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Den Brok, P. J. (2012). Teachers’ positioning towards an educational innovation in the light of ownership, sense-making and agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2011). Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education27(5), 812–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.001.
  18. Martin, J. (2016). The grammar of agency: Studying possibilities for student agency in science classroom discourse. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitchell, I., Keast, S., Panizzon, D., & Mitchell, J. (2016). Using ‘big ideas’ to enhance teaching and student learning. Teachers and Teaching, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2016.1218328
  20. Muhlhaüsler, P., & Harré, R. (1990). Pronouns and People. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2014). Teachers’ professional agency and learning—From adaptation to active modification in the teacher community. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2014.995483.
  22. Reid, J. (2015). ‘Practice’: Foregrounding the study of teaching in initial teacher education. In M. Jones & J. Ryan (Eds.), Successful teacher education. Sense: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  23. Shotter, J. (1995). In conversation: Joint action, shared intentionality and ethics. Theory Psychology, 5(1), 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., Toom, A., & Phyalto, K. (2015). What contributes to first-year student teachers’ sense of professional agency in the classroom? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. TEMAG. (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Canberra: Ministry of Education Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/action_now_classroom_ready_teachers_accessible.pdf. Accessed September 9, 2015.
  26. Tirri, K., Meri, M., & Kansanen, P. (2000). Teachers’ pedagogical thinking: Theoretical landscapes, practical challenges. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Incorporated.Google Scholar
  27. Turnbull, M. (2005). Student teacher professional agency in the practicum. Asia Pacific Teacher Education, 33, 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. (WFI). (2016). Thank God You’re Here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thank_God_You’re_Here. Accessed November 20, 2016.
  29. Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Zhu, K. (2016) 1.5 The black box: Why does it work? In S. Keast, L. Rutherford, R. Giampaolo, M. Sweerts & G. Tissera (Eds.), Learning to teach science 2: Stories of practice by pre-service teachers (pp. 35–37). Melbourne: Invicium Print Management.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Education and ArtsAustralian Catholic UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Monash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations