Conclusion

  • Iris Erh-Ya Pai
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Gender, Sexualities and Culture in Asia book series (GSCA)

Abstract

Benefitting from social changes in the last few decades, single Taiwanese women seem to have gained greater sexual autonomy and freer lifestyle choices. Single lesbians can now more easily pass as heterosexual; however, this is not an easy choice once they form a relationship. Despite increased freedoms, it is difficult for lesbian erotic relationships to be acknowledged in patriarchal families. I argue for an understanding of lesbian relationships that takes account of families of origin and lesbians’ negotiation of the wider social context of Taiwanese Confucian patriarchy. My choice of terminology ‘family/families’ served to highlight the fact that Taiwanese lesbians have a strong family tie, while they sought varying ways to have their own families accepted by their families of origin. Notably, their notion of family distinguished them from same-sex couples in other countries. By highlighting the specific issues in Taiwan, I believe that it is possible for lesbians to make their lives outside patriarchal families, which is understandable only in their situational contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Chao, A. (2001). Drinks, stories, penis, and breasts: lesbian tomboys in Taiwan from 1960s to 1990s. Journal of Homosexuality, 40(3/4), 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chao, A. (2002). How come I can’t stand guarantee for my own life?: Taiwan citizenship and the cultural logic of queer identity. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 3(3), 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chao, A. Y.-N. 趙彥寧. (2005). lao-T bian jia: quan qiu hua zhuang tai xia de ku-er wen hua gong min shen fen chu tan 老T搬家: 全球化狀態下的酷兒文化公民身分初探 (Moving house: the relational-materialistic aspect of queer cultural citizenship). Taiwan: A radical Quarterly in Social Studies, 57, 47–85.Google Scholar
  4. Gabb, J. (2004). Critical differentials: querying the incongruities within research on lesbian parent families. Sexualities, 7(2), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heaphy, B., & Einarsdottir, A. (2013). Scripting civil partnership: interviewing couples together and apart. Qualitative Research, 13(1), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kamano, S., & Khor, D. (2008). ‘How Did You Two Meet?’ Lesbian partnerships in present-day Japan. In S. Jackson, J. Liu, J. Woo (Eds.), East Asian sexualities: modernity, gender & new sexual cultures. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  7. Kong, T. S. K. (2012). Chinese male homosexualities: memba, tongzhi and golden boy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Tang, D. T.-S. (2011). Conditional spaces: Hong Kong lesbian desires and everyday life. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Weeks, J., Heaphy, B., Donovan, C. (2001). Same sex intimacies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Yau, C. (Ed.) (2010). As normal as possible: negotiating sexuality and gender in Mainland China and Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iris Erh-Ya Pai
    • 1
  1. 1.YorkUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations