Quality Measurement and Evaluation Technology Research of Power Grid Dispatching Automation System Software

  • Xin Xu
  • Yujia Li
  • Lixin Li
  • Fangchun Di
  • Qing-bo Yang
  • Ling-lin Gong
  • Lin-peng Zhang
Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 698)

Abstract

According to the quality requirements and business characteristics of power grid dispatching automation system software, the author proposed a software quality evaluation model that suitable for power dispatching automation system, meanwhile combining with quality methods of the current common software. The quality model was decomposed into quality characteristics, quality sub-features and metric elements. The author used analytic hierarchy process to establish the evaluation index system and determined the index weight, and used the fuzzy evaluation method for quality evaluation. The technology provides an important basis for the quality control of power grid dispatching automation system products, and ensures the power grid dispatching automation system operating in a safe, stable and reliable way.

Keywords

Power dispatching automation system Quality evaluation model Analytic hierarchy 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Nair, T.R.G., Selvarani, R.: Defect proneness estimation and feedback approach for software design quality improvement. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(3), 274–285 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schneidewind, N.: What can software engineers learn from manufacturing to improve software process and product. J. Intell. Manuf. 22(4), 597–606 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abdellatief, M., Sultan, A.B.M., Ghani, A.A.A., et al.: A mapping study to investigate component based software system metrics. J. Syst. Softw. 86(3), 587–603 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, K., Lee, S.: A quantitative evaluation model using the ISO/IEC 9126 quality model in the component based development process. In: Gavrilova, M.L., Gervasi, O., Kumar, V., Tan, C.J.K., Taniar, D., Laganá, A., Mun, Y., Choo, H. (eds.) ICCSA 2006. LNCS, vol. 3983, pp. 917–926. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi: 10.1007/11751632_99 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Côté, M.-A., Suryn, W., et al.: The evolution path for industrial software quality evaluation methods applying ISO/IEC 9126:2001 quality model: example of MITRE’s SQAE method. Softw. Qual. J. 13(1), 17–30 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yuen, K.K.F., Lau, H.C.W.: A fuzzy group analytical hierarchy process approach for software quality assurance management: fuzzy logarithmic least squares method. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(8), 10292–10302 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guo, Y., Tang, H.Y., Qu, D.G.: Dynamic comprehensive evaluation method and application based on minimum variance. Syst. Eng. Electron. 32(6), 1225–1228 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou, J.H., Wang, Z., Yang, Z.: Research on software quality evaluation based on fuzzy evaluation method. Syst. Eng. Electron. 26(7), 987–991 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    You, T.H., Fan, Z., Li, H.Y.: A synthetic evaluation method of software quality based on two-tuple linguistic information processing. Syst. Eng. Electron. 27(3), 545–549 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guo, F., Hou, Z., Dai, Z.: Modeling and simulation of ANFIS software quality evaluation based on expert knowledge. Syst. Eng. Electron. 28(2), 317–320 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xin Xu
    • 1
  • Yujia Li
    • 1
  • Lixin Li
    • 1
  • Fangchun Di
    • 1
  • Qing-bo Yang
    • 1
  • Ling-lin Gong
    • 1
  • Lin-peng Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.China Electric Power Research InstituteBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations