Capturing Cognition via EEG-Based Functional Brain Networks

  • Md. Hedayetul Islam Shovon
  • D. (Nanda) Nandagopal
  • Bernadine Cocks
  • Ramasamy Vijayalakshmi
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Series in BioEngineering book series (SERBIOENG)

Abstract

The human brain is comprised of complex networks of neuronal connections, with the functioning of these networks underscoring human cognition. At any given point in time, the complexity of these networks may be greater than the entire communications network on the planet yet functional brain networks are not static; instead, they form and dissolve within milliseconds. Although much is known about the functions and actions of individual neurons in isolation, at a systems level, when billions of neurons coordinate their individual activity to create functional brain networks and thus cognition, understanding is limited. This is due in part to the system behaving completely differently to its parts; that is, emergent properties such as intelligence, emotion and cognition cannot be adequately explained from a sum-of-parts perspective; what is needed instead are powerful computational techniques to model and explore both the intricacies and dynamics of functional brain networks. Although unravelling the activity of the human brain remains circumscribed by technological and ethical constraints, complex network analysis of EEG data offers new ways to quantitatively characterize neuronal cluster patterns. This, in turn, allows the analysis of functional brain networks to understand the complex architecture of such networks. Despite the increasing attention that functional brain network analysis is gaining in computational neuroscience, the true potential of such analysis to reveal dynamic interdependencies between brain regions has yet to be realized. To address this, multi-channel EEG data has been used to examine the dynamics of such networks during cognitive activity using Information Theory based nonlinear statistical measures such as transfer entropy. Results across different paradigms requiring different types of cognitive effort clearly suggest that transfer entropy is a highly sensitive measure for detecting cognitive activity. Furthermore, these results demonstrate that transfer entropy has clear potential for developing cognitive metrics based on complex features such as connectivity density, clustering coefficient and weighted degree. These techniques may also have application in the clinical diagnosis of cognitive impairment as well as providing new insights into normal cognitive development and function.

Keywords

Transfer entropy Information flow Directed functional brain network EEG Cognitive activity Cognitive load 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Parent, A., Carpenter, M.B.: Ch. 1. Carpenter’s Human Neuroanatomy. Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 978-0-683-06752-1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sperry, R.W., Gazzaniga, M.S., Bogen, J.E.: Interhemispheric relationships: the neocortical commissures; syndromes of hemisphere disconnection. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 4 (1969)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chilosi, A.M., Brovedani, P., Moscatelli, M., Bonanni, P., Guerrini, R.: Neuropsychological findings in idiopathic occipital lobe epilepsies. Epilepsia 47, 76–78 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bogousslavsky, J., Khurana, R., Deruaz, J., Hornung, J., Regli, F., Janzer, R., Perret, C.: Respiratory failure and unilateral caudal brainstem infarction. Ann. Neurol. 28, 668–673 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crick, F.: Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81, 4586–4590 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Azevedo, F.A., Carvalho, L.R., Grinberg, L.T., Farfel, J.M., Ferretti, R.E., Leite, R.E., Lent, R., Herculano-Houzel, S.: Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 513, 532–541 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marois, R., Ivanoff, J.: Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 296–305 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bassett, D.S., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Achard, S., Duke, T., Bullmore, E.: Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103, 19518–19523 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Batty, M., Taylor, M.J.: Early processing of the six basic facial emotional expressions. Cogn. Brain. Res. 17, 613–620 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sergent, C., Baillet, S., Dehaene, S.: Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1391–1400 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nunez, P.L.: Electroencephalography (EEG). In: Ramachandran, V.S. (ed.) (In Chief) Encyclopaedia of the Human Brain, pp. 169–179Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huttenlocher, P.R.: Neural Plasticity. Harvard University Press (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kleim, J.A., Jones, T.A.: Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 51, S225–S239 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Callan, D.E., Tajima, K., Callan, A.M., Kubo, R., Masaki, S., Akahane-Yamada, R.: Learning-induced neural plasticity associated with improved identification performance after training of a difficult second-language phonetic contrast. Neuroimage 19, 113–124 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klingberg, T.: Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 317–324 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brierley, J.B., Beck, E.: The significance in human stereotactic brain surgery of individual variation in the diencephalon and globus pallidus. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 22, 287–298 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ploughman, M.: Exercise is brain food: the effects of physical activity on cognitive function. Dev. Neurorehabil. 11, 236–240 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leigh Gibson, E., Green, M.W.: Nutritional influences on cognitive function: mechanisms of susceptibility. Nutr. Res. Rev. 15, 169–206 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Janowsky, J.S., Oviatt, S.K., Orwoll, E.S.: Testosterone influences spatial cognition in older men. Behav. Neurosci. 108, 325 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Friston, K., Moran, R., Seth, A.K.: Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 23, 172–178 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goldstein, J.: Emergence as a construct: history and issues. Emergence 1, 49–72 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cocks, B., Jamieson, G.A.: What should be the place of the normative database in speech perception research? J. Cogn. Sci. 14, 399–417 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koelsch, S., Siebel, W.A.: Towards a neural basis of music perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 578–584 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mclntosh, A., Gonzalez-Lima, F.: Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2, 2–22 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bullmore, E., Sporns, O.: Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186–198 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bunn, A.G., Urban, D.L., Keitt, T.: Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. J. Environ. Manage. 59, 265–278 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Björneborn, L., Ingwersen, P.: Perspective of webometrics. Scientometrics 50, 65–82 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bar-Ilan, J.: Data collection methods on the Web for infometric purposes—a review and analysis. Scientometrics 50, 7–32 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Almind, T.C., Ingwersen, P.: Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’. J. Doc. 53, 404–426 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ts’o, D.Y., Gilbert, C.D., Wiesel, T.N.: Relationships between horizontal interactions and functional architecture in cat striate cortex as revealed by cross-correlation analysis. J. Neurosci. 6, 1160–1170 (1986)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dobie, R.A., Wilson, M.J.: Objective detection of 40 Hz auditory evoked potentials: phase coherence vs. magnitude-squared coherence. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol./Evoked Potentials Sect. 92, 405–413 (1994)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kowalski, C.J.: On the effects of non-normality on the distribution of the sample product-moment correlation coefficient. Appl. Stat. 1–12 (1972)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sankari, Z., Adeli, H., Adeli, A.: Wavelet coherence model for diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 43, 268–278 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jeong, J., Gore, J.C., Peterson, B.S.: Mutual information analysis of the EEG in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112, 827–835 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shovon, M.H.I., Nandagopal, D.N., Vijayalakshmi, R., Du, J.T., Cocks, B.: Transfer entropy and information flow patterns in functional brain networks during cognitive activity. In: Neural Information Processing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 8834), Part I, pp. 1–10. Springer (2014)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Coveney, P.V.: The second law of thermodynamics-entropy, irreversibility and dynamics. Nature 333, 409–415 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shannon, C.E.: Prediction and entropy of printed English. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 30, 50–64 (1951)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schreiber, T.: Measuring information transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 461 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kaiser, A., Schreiber, T.: Information transfer in continuous processes. Physica D 166, 43–62 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gourévitch, B., Eggermont, J.J.: Evaluating information transfer between auditory cortical neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 2533–2543 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Neymotin, S.A., Jacobs, K.M., Fenton, A.A., Lytton, W.W.: Synaptic information transfer in computer models of neocortical columns. J. Comput. Neurosci. 30, 69–84 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rubinov, M., Sporns, O.: Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 52, 1059–1069 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fagiolo, G.: Clustering in complex directed networks. Phys. Rev. E 76, 026107 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Grossman, M., Cooke, A., DeVita, C., Chen, W., Moore, P., Detre, J., Alsop, D., Gee, J.: Sentence processing strategies in healthy seniors with poor comprehension: an fMRI study. Brain Lang. 80, 296–313 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Savic, I., Berglund, H.: Passive perception of odors and semantic circuits. Hum. Brain Mapp. 21, 271–278 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    MacLeod, C.M.: The Stroop task: the “gold standard” of attentional measures. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 121, 12 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Friedman, L., Kenny, J.T., Wise, A.L., Wu, D., Stuve, T.A., Miller, D.A., Jesberger, J.A., Lewin, J.S.: Brain activation during silent word generation evaluated with functional MRI. Brain Lang. 64, 231–256 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shovon, M.H.I., Nandagopal, D.N., Vijayalakshmi, R., Du, J.T., Cocks, B.: Towards a cognitive metric using normalized transfer entropy. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ASE International Conference on Biomedical Computing (BioMedCom 2014), December 13–16, Cambridge, MA, USA (2015)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shovon, M.H.I., Nandagopal, D.N., Du, J.T., Vijayalakshmi, R., Cocks, B.: Cognitive activity during web search. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 967–970. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    CURRY 7 EEG Acquisition and Analysis Software. Compumedics Neuroscan USA LtdGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nuamps EEG Amplifier (Model 7181). Compumedics Neuroscan USA LtdGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    STIM 2 Stimulus Delivery and Experiment Control Solution. Compumedics Neuroscan USA LtdGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Simuride Pro Driving Simulator Software 2010 AplusB Software CorporationGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rubia, K., Russell, T., Overmeyer, S., Brammer, M.J., Bullmore, E.T., Sharma, T., Simmons, A., Williams, S.C., Giampietro, V., Andrew, C.M.: Mapping motor inhibition: conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks. Neuroimage 13, 250–261 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wexler, B.: Dichotic presentation as a method for single hemisphere simulation studies. In: Hugdahl, K. (ed.) Handbook of Dichotic Listening: Theory, Methods and Research. John Wiley & Sons Dichotic Listening, Great Britain (1988)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Luck, S.J., Hillyard, S.A.: Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20, 1000 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Delorme, A., Makeig, S.: EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134, 9–21 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Camtasia Screen Recording & Video Editing. TechSmith CorporationGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Vijayalakshmi, R., Dasari, N., Nandagopal, D., Subhiksha, R., Cocks, B., Dahal, N., Thilaga, M.: Change detection and visualization of functional brain networks using EEG data. Proc. Comput. Sci. 29, 672–682 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Abramowitz, J.S., Deacon, B.J., Whiteside, S.P.: Exposure therapy for anxiety: principles and practice. Guilford Press (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Md. Hedayetul Islam Shovon
    • 1
  • D. (Nanda) Nandagopal
    • 1
  • Bernadine Cocks
    • 1
  • Ramasamy Vijayalakshmi
    • 2
  1. 1.Cognitive Neuroengineering and Computational Neuroscience Laboratory, School of Information Technology and Mathematical SciencesUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Applied Mathematics and Computational SciencePSG College of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations