Measuring Innovation in Firms

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

This chapter examines the interdependence between various measurements of firms’ innovation outputs. Linking firm-level microdata from the Japanese National Innovation Survey to the literature-based microdata on firm innovation from press releases and data on intellectual property rights such as patents, trademarks, and design registrations, I construct a panel data set that captures the diversity of innovation activities. Additionally, I examine the effects of firms’ innovation outputs on the market value and productivity of firms. The empirical results suggest that observed firm’s press releases represent the multidimensional innovation activities of firms, particularly the radical product (new-to-market) innovations, organizational innovation, and research and development (R&D) activities for technological developments. For intellectual property rights, the empirical results show that firms with product innovation registered more trademarks, and firms with more radical new products registered trademarks. Patent data reflects the R&D activity of firms, while design registrations reflect the self-reported design innovations and design activity measured in the innovation survey. In addition to patent applications and trademark registrations, press releases on new products, technological developments, and organizational changes increase the market value of a firm.

Keywords

Design registration Innovation Literature-based innovation output indicator Patent Press release R&D Trademark 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1987). Innovation, market structure, and firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 567–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrew, J. P., Haanaes, K., Michael, D., Harold, S., & Taylor, A. (2008). Measuring innovation 2008: Squandered opportunities. bcg.perspectives, the Boston Consulting Group. Retrieved from http://www.bcg.com/documents/file15302.pdf
  3. Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management, 23, 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coombs, R., Narandren, P., & Richards, A. (1996). A literature-based innovation output indicator. Research Policy, 25, 403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corrado, C. A., Hulten, C. R., & Sichel, D. E. (2009). Intangible capital and U.S. economic growth. Review of Income and Wealth, 55, 661–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1154–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Ippolito, B. (2014). The importance of design for firms’ competitiveness: A review of the literature. Technovation, 34, 716–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edison, H., bin Ali, N., & Torkar, R. (2013). Towards innovation measurement in the software industry. Journal of Systems and Software, 86, 1390–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Griliches, Z. (1984). R&D, patents, and productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661–1707.Google Scholar
  11. Hall, B. H. (2000). Innovation and market value. In R. Barrell, G. Mason, & M. O’Mahoney (Eds.), Productivity, innovation and economic performance (pp. 177–198). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Livesey, F., & Moultrie, J. (2008). Do trademarks and design registrations provide a better perspective on national innovation activity? London: DIME Conference on the Creative Industries and Intellectual Property.Google Scholar
  13. Mendonça, S., Pereira, T. S., & Godinho, M. M. (2004). Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change. Research Policy, 33, 1385–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nagaoka, S., Motohashi, K., & Goto, A. (2010). Patent statistics as an innovation indicator. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 1083–1127). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  15. OECD. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. OECD. (2009). Innovation in firms: A microeconomic perspective. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Okada, Y., Naito, Y., & Nagaoka, S. (2016). Claim length as a value predictor of a patent (IIR working paper, No. 16–04). Kunitachi Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University.Google Scholar
  18. Rubera, G., & Droge, C. (2013). Technology versus design innovation’s effects on sales and Tobin’s q: The moderating role of branding strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 448–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Verganti, R. (2003). Design as brokering of languages: Innovation strategies in Italian firms. Design Management Journal, 14, 34–42.Google Scholar
  20. Walsh, V. (1996). Design, innovation and the boundaries of the firm. Research Policy, 25, 509–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI), IAAChiyoda-kuJapan
  2. 2.National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP)Chiyoda-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations