Design’s Role in Transitioning to Futures of Cultures of Repair

  • Tristan SchultzEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 66)


This paper traces a historical and conceptual terrain of cultures of repair from a decolonial and ontological design perspective, i.e., through decolonial design. In the face of present and mounting future challenges, particularly Climate Change, consequent migration and global unsettlement, indiscriminately reaching all geographies, cultures of repair afford ecological, social, and technological exemplars of adaptation and resilience. Yet neither the complexity of the trace nor the imperative for appropriation is adequately reaching designers. To explore filling this gap, a relational map is presented here, that aims to aide designers understand four key threads implicated in the destruction of cultures of repair—concealment; newness; techne; care—and three key moves toward revaluing cultures of repair—transferrability, reclassification, amplification.


Cultures of repair Repair Decolonial design Recoding Design Modernity Colonialism Climate change Resilience Sustainable futures 


  1. 1.
    Jackson, S.J.: Rethinking repair. In: Gillespie, T. Boczkowski, P.J., Foot, K.A. (ed.) Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, pp. 221–240. The MIT Press, Massachusetts (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suman Devadula, A.C.: Technology-led human development: from ability to capability. In: Design for Sustainable Well-being and Empowerment: Indo-Dutch International Conference on Design. Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mignolo, W.D.: The Darker Side of Western Modernity. Duke University Press, London (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fry, T.: Design Futuring. Berg, UNSW Press, Oxford, Sydney (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tonkinwise, C.: Design for transitions—from and to what? Des. Philos. Pap. 13, 85–92 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Escobar, A.: Territories of Difference. Duke University Press, London (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oliveira, P.J.S.V.d.: Design at the earview: decolonizing speculative design through sonic fiction. Des. Issues 32, 43–52 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Danah Abdulla, E.C., Keshavarz, M., Kiem, M., Oliveira, P., Prado, L, Schultz, T.: Decolonising Design. Available: [Accessed 1 July 2016] (2016)
  9. 9.
    Sachs, W.: Planet Dialectics: Exploration in Environment and Development. Zed Books Pty Ltd., London (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tonkinwise, C.: Urgently designing cosmopolitan localism in the era of xenophobia. In: Nordes 2015: Design Ecologies. Nordis Design Research, Stockholm, Sweden (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Escobar, A.: Transiciones: a space for research and design for transitions to the pluriverse. Des. Philos. Pap. 13, 13–23 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fonseca, F.: Gambiarra: Repair Culture. Tvergastein: Interdisc. J. Environ. (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Obama, B.: President Obama Announces Two New Public-Private Manufacturing Innovation Institutes and Launches the First of Four New Manufacturing Innovation Institute Competitions, vol. 2016. The White House: Office of the Press Secretary, Washington (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Turnball, M.: Launch of the National Innovation and Science Agenda. Malcolm Turnbull MP, NSW (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levi-Strauss, C.: The Savage Mind. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1966)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Birtchnell, T.: Indovation: Innovation and a Global Knowledge Economy in India. Palgrave Macmillan, UK (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meade, M.: Golden Repair of the Cracks in the World. Huffpost Healthy Living, The Huffington Post US (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Strasser, S.: Waste and Want: A Social History of Trash. Holt Paperbacks, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Arkhipov, V.: Home-Made: Contemporary Russian Folk Artifacts. Fuel Publishing, London (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coles-Janess, W.: Bougainville: Our Island, Our Fight. 52 min, Australia (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carolyn, F., Strauss, A.F.-L.: The slow design principles: a new interrogative and reflexive tool for design research and practice. In: Changing the Change: Design Visions Proposals and Tools (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guffey, E.: Crafting yesterday’s tomorrows: Retro-Futurism, steampunk, and the problem of making in the twenty-first century. J. Mod. Craft 7, 249–266 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shove, E.: Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality. Berg, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Debord, G.: The Society of the Spectacle. Black & Red, New York (1970)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fry, T.: Time, Things and Futures. Zoontechnica (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Heidegger, M.: The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays/Martin Heidegger; translated and with an introd. by William Lovitt. Garland Publishing, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thrift, S.G.N.: Out of order: understanding repair and maintenance. Theory Cult. Soc. 24, 1–25 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stiegler, B.: Within the limits of capitalism, economizing means taking care. In: Cohen, T. (ed.) Telemorphosis: Theory in the Era of Climate Change. Open Humanities Press, London (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zygmunt Bauman, L.D.: Moral Blindness: The Loss of Sensitivity in Liquid Modernity. Polity, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Turkle, S.: Evocative Objects: Things We Think With. The MIT Press, Massachusetts (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Manzini, E.: Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. MIT Press Ltd, Cambridge, Mass, United States (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Terry Irwin, G.K.: Cameron Tonkinwise: transition design provocation. Des. Philos. Pap. 13, 3–11 (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Thackara, J.: How to Thrive in the Next Economy: Designing Tomorrow’s World Today. Thames & Hudson, London (2015)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Latour, B.: A cautious prometheus? A few steps toward a philosophy of design (with Special Attention to Peter Sloterdijk). In: Networks of Design Conference. Design History Society, Cornwall (2008)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Drucker, J.: Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Massachusetts Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schultz, T.: Cognitive Redirective Mapping: Drawing Together Knowledge Production. Drawing International Brisbane: ego.artefact.arena. Griffith Centre for Creative Arts Research, Queensland College of Art, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Griffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations