Advertisement

Using Video for Teacher Reflection: Reading Clinics in Action

  • Erica BowersEmail author
  • Barbara Laster
  • Debra Gurvitz
  • Tammy Ryan
  • Jeanne Cobb
  • JoAnne Vazzano
Chapter
Part of the Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices book series (STEP, volume 17)

Abstract

The study reported in this chapter grew out of a decade of conversations among reading teacher educators about the use of video in facilitating teacher reflection and instructional improvement in university-based reading clinic courses. The data reported here were gathered from two university sites in the United States. Using a formative experiment methodology, we designed a study to better understand the ways in which reflective processes might be mediated by the use of video technology. The study had three phases of inquiry. We worked to develop a common reflection process and supportive protocols for use in our courses. We designed, trialed, and iteratively redesigned video reflection assignments and prompts, and we sought teacher feedback. We also examined teachers’ responses in course assignments as they reflected on their own teaching and learning. Our goal was to create a video assignment that would encourage teachers toward deeper, more thoughtful reflection. Our final development exercise was to design a set of criteria, a rubric of sorts that we could use in conjunction with the assignment prompts to help teachers self-reflect and to facilitate peer-to-peer and instructor feedback. While we discuss our experiences with factors that can impact the effective use of video-prompted reflection, our belief is that others will find our work useful and will be encouraged to use video as a way to foster teachers’ reflective thinking.

Keywords

Preservice Teacher Video Recording Formative Experiment Teacher Learning English Language Learner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Danielson, L. (2009). Fostering reflection. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 1–5. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/feb09/vol66/num05/Fostering-Reflection.aspx
  2. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. New York: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  3. Dozier, C. (2006). Responsive literacy coaching: Tools for creating and sustaining purposeful change. Portland: Stenhouse Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  5. Jian, W., & Kendall, H. (2003). Video technology as support for teacher education reform. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 105–138.Google Scholar
  6. Jones, M., & Ryan, J. (2014). Learning in the practicum: Engaging pre-service teachers in reflective practice in the online space. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 132–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kreber, C., & Cranton, P. (2000). Exploring the scholarship of teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 476–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pena, C., & De Leon, L. (2011). The use of digital video to foster reflective practice in teacher education. International Journal of Instructional Media, 38(2), 125–132.Google Scholar
  9. Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. (2008). On formative and design experiments: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. A. (2004). Connecting research and practice using formative and design experiments. In N. K. Duke & M. H. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (pp. 149–169). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Reinking, D., & Watkins, J. (2000). A formative experiment investigating the use of multimedia book reviews to increase elementary student’s independent reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(3), 384–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Risko, V. J., Vukelich, C., & Roskos, K. (2002). Preparing teachers for reflective practice: Intentions contradictions and possibilities. Language Arts, 80, 134–144.Google Scholar
  13. Rosean, C. L., Lundeberg, M. C., Fritzen, A., & Terpstra, M. (2008). Noticing noticing: How does investigation of video records change how teachers reflect on their experiences? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Santagata, R., & Angelici, G. (2010). Studying the impact of the lesson analysis framework on preservice teachers’ abilities to reflect on videos of classroom teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(4), 339–349. doi: 10.1177/0022487110369555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shanahan, L., & Tochelli, A. (2014). Examining the use of video study groups for developing literacy pedagogical content knowledge of critical elements of strategy instruction with elementary teachers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 53, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tripp, T., & Rich, P. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 728–739. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tsangaridou, N., & O’Sullivan, M. (1994). Using pedagogical reflective strategies to enhance reflection among preservice physical education teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14, 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vazzano, J., & Pariza, J. (2010, December). Fostering the language of coaching while debriefing video-recorded strategy lessons. Paper presentation at the 60th annual meeting of the Literacy Researchers Association, Fort Worth, TX.Google Scholar
  20. Wass, R., Harland, T., & Mercer, A. (2011). Scaffolding critical thinking in the zone of proximal development. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erica Bowers
    • 1
    Email author
  • Barbara Laster
    • 2
  • Debra Gurvitz
    • 3
  • Tammy Ryan
    • 4
  • Jeanne Cobb
    • 5
  • JoAnne Vazzano
    • 6
  1. 1.California State University FullertonFullertonUSA
  2. 2.Towson UniversityTowsonUSA
  3. 3.Independent Education ConsultantChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Jacksonville UniversityJacksonvilleUSA
  5. 5.Coastal Carolina UniversityConwayUSA
  6. 6.Northeastern Illinois UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations