Advertisement

Introduction to the Flipped Classroom

  • Carl ReidsemaEmail author
  • Roger Hadgraft
  • Lydia Kavanagh
Chapter

Abstract

It is Monday morning, bright and early, as Laura rushes from the bus stop to the massive event centre, where her first-year engineering workshop is being held. It is the second week of the course and she knows that she is falling behind a bit because she did not watch the recommended pre-learning podcast for this workshop that, she seems to recall, is something to do with setting your learning goals. She is still a bit puzzled because this course is not like any of her other courses in first-year engineering. The professor called it a flipped classroom and although she is not exactly sure what that means, she knows that there are not any lectures, which kind of irritates her a bit. The purpose of beginning our book “Flipped Classroom Practice and Practices” with this example is that it provides us with one of the most audacious, yet promising implementation of the flipped classroom approach that we are aware of. Successfully integrating fundamental disciplinary knowledge with active, authentic practice at such large scales challenges some of our most dearly held beliefs about learning in higher education (i.e. the lower the student/staff ratio the better) and also shines a light on a range of issues that are systematic to the culture and organisational structure of today’s universities. These issues must be resolved if we are to successfully adapt to the social and technological changes we currently face. And this is why we flipped our classroom.

Keywords

Flipped learning Collaboration University transition Social media Educational technology 

References

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Journal of Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bexley, E., James, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2011). The Australian academic profession in transition. Melbourne, VIC: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  3. Coomes, M., & DeBard, R. (Eds). (2004). New directions for student services (Vol. 106, pp. 1–99).Google Scholar
  4. Crouch, H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(6031), 862–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Graham, R. (2012). Achieving excellence in engineering education: the ingredients of successful change. The Royal Academy of Engineering: London. http://www.rhgraham.org/RHG/Recent_projects_files/Educational%20change%20summary%20report.pdf. Last accessed: 23 Dec 2016.
  7. Northern Illinois University, Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center. http://www.niu.edu/facdev/resources/guide/students/millennials_our_newest_generation_in_higher_education.pdf. Last accessed: March 24, 2016.
  8. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. Troy, MO: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  9. Reidsema, C. A., Kavanagh, L., & Jolly, L. (2014). Flipping the classroom at scale to achieve integration of theory and practice in a first year engineering design and build course. In: The ASEE 2014 Annual Conference and Exposition 360 Degrees of Engineering Education: Proceedings. 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: 360 Degrees of Engineering Education, Indianapolis, IN United States, June 15–18, 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations