Control of Quadrotors Using Neural Networks for Precise Landing Maneuvers

  • U. S. AnanthakrishnanEmail author
  • Nagarajan Akshay
  • Gayathri Manikutty
  • Rao R. Bhavani
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 517)


Aerial and ground robots have been widely used in tandem to overcome the limitations of the individual systems, such as short run time and limited field of view. Several strategies have been proposed for this collaboration and all of them involve periodic autonomous precision landing of the aerial vehicle on the ground robot for recharging. Intelligent control systems like neural networks lend themselves naturally to precision landing applications since they offer immunity to system dynamics and adaptability to various environments. Our work describes an offline neural network backpropagation controller to provide visual servoing for the landing operation. The quadrotor control system is designed to perform precise landing on a marker platform within the specified time and distance constraints. The proposed method has been simulated and validated in a Gazebo and robot operating system simulation environment.


UAV-UGV collaboration Quadrotor landing Vision based navigation Neural networks Backpropagation algorithm ROS architecture 



Our work has been motivated by the humanitarian initiatives of Mata Amritanandamayi Devi, the Chancellor of Amrita University. She has been our inspiration and support. Our gratitude goes to Prof. Kurien Issac and Dr. Radhamani Pillay, who offered constructive criticism and valuable feedback at various stages of this project. We also thank the research group at Ammachi Labs for their support and offering us the resources that aided our work.


  1. 1.
    L. Cantelli, M. Mangiameli, C. Melita, and G. Muscato, “UAV/UGV cooperation for surveying operations in humanitarian demining,” in Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR), 2013 IEEE International symposium on, pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Maini and P. Sujit, “On cooperation between a fuel constrained uav and a refueling ugv for large scale mapping applications,” in Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 2015 International Conference on, pp. 1370–1377, IEEE, 2015.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G.-J. M. Kruijff, F. Colas, T. Svoboda, J. Van Diggelen, P. Balmer, F. Pirri, and R. Worst, “Designing intelligent robots for human-robot teaming in urban search and rescue,” in AAAI Spring Symposium: Designing Intelligent Robots, 2012.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Chaturvedi, R. Chauhan, and P. K. Kalra, “Application of generalised neural network for aircraft landing control system,” Soft Computing, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 441–448, 2002.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Izadi, M. Pakmehr, and N. Sadati, “Optimal neuro-controller in longitudinal auto-landing of a commercial jet transport,” in Control Applications, 2003. CCA 2003. Proceedings of 2003 IEEE Conference on, vol. 1, pp. 492–497, IEEE, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.-G. Juang, L.-H. Chien, and F. Lin, “Automatic landing control system design using adaptive neural network and its hardware realization,” Systems Journal, IEEE, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 266–277, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Gautam, P. Sujit, and S. Saripalli, “A survey of autonomous landing techniques for uavs,” in Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 2014 International Conference on, pp. 1210–1218, IEEE, 2014.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Papachristos and A. Tzes, “The power-tethered uav-ugv team: A collaborative strategy for navigation in partially-mapped environments,” in Control and Au- tomation (MED), 2014 22nd Mediterranean Conference of, pp. 1153–1158, IEEE, 2014.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Lee, J. Zhou, and W. T. Lin, “Autonomous battery swapping system for quadrotor,” in Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 2015 International Conference on, pp. 118–124, IEEE, 2015.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Toksoz, J. Redding, M. Michini, B. Michini, J. P. How, M. Vavrina, and J. Vian, “Automated battery swap and recharge to enable persistent uav missions,” in AIAA Infotech@ Aerospace Conference, 2011.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Tayebi and S. McGilvray, “Attitude stabilization of a four-rotor aerial robot,” in Decision and Control, 2004. CDC. 43rd IEEE Conference on, vol. 2, pp. 1216–1221, IEEE, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Luukkonen, “Modelling and control of quadrotor,” Independent research project in applied mathematics, Espoo, 2011.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Benavidez, J. Lambert, A. Jaimes, and M. Jamshidi, “Landing of an ardrone 2.0 quadrotor on a mobile base using fuzzy logic,” in World Automation Congress (WAC), 2014, pp. 803–812, IEEE, 2014.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Lee, T. Ryan, and H. J. Kim, “Autonomous landing of a vtol uav on a moving platform using image-based visual servoing,” in Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2012 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 971–976, IEEE, 2012.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Quigley, K. Conley, B. Gerkey, J. Faust, T. Foote, J. Leibs, R. Wheeler, and A. Y. Ng, “Ros: an open-source robot operating system,” in ICRA workshop on open source software, vol. 3, p. 5, 2009.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Huang and J. Sturm, “tumsimulator ros wiki,” 2014. [Online; accessed 23-December-2015;].

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. S. Ananthakrishnan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nagarajan Akshay
    • 1
  • Gayathri Manikutty
    • 1
  • Rao R. Bhavani
    • 1
  1. 1.AMMACHI LabsAmrita School of Engineering, Amritapuri Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Amrita UniversityKollamIndia

Personalised recommendations