A Companion to Wittgenstein on Education pp 687-699 | Cite as
‘Not to Explain, but to Accept’: Wittgenstein and the Pedagogic Potential of Film
Abstract
The current use of film in education is limited to either its illustrative function in the service of other ideas, or as the object of empirical and theoretical study. Wittgenstein sees both illustration and explanation as extensions of the Cartesian legacy of psychologism and thereby disengaged from the actual experience of the world. Film, Wittgenstein’s followers argue, provides a unique opportunity to reconnect with that immediate experience: firstly, by exposing the neuroses of psychologism; and secondly, by inviting the viewer to relinquish the tendency to explain film’s hidden meanings prior to accepting what it has to say on its own terms. Finally, where film is currently being taken very seriously by some philosophers as a mode of philosophising in itself, or a medium that philosophises in front of our eyes, I will argue that the same attention has not yet been given to the ways in which film can act as an educator (how it can teach).
Keywords
Wittgenstein Cavell Film PedagogyReferences
- Allen, R., & Turvey, M. (2001). Wittgenstein’s later philosophy: A prophylaxis against theory. In R. Allen & M. Turvey (Eds.), Wittgenstein, theory, and the arts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bauer, N. (2005). Cogito Ergo film: Plato, Descartes, and Fight Club. In R. Read & J. Goodenough (Eds.), Film as philosophy: Essays on cinema after Wittgenstein and Cavell (pp. 39–56). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bauer, N. (2015). Reel girls and real girls: What becomes of women on film?Google Scholar
- Budd, M. (2013). Wittgenstein’s philosophy of psychology. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cavell, S. (1979). The world viewed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Cavell, S. (2004). Cities of words: Pedagogical letters on a register of the moral life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Cavell, S. (2005). What becomes of thinking on film. In R. Read & J. Goodenough (Eds.), Film as philosophy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Descartes, R. (1968). Discourse on method and the meditations. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. Google Scholar
- Hutchinson, P., & Read, R. (2005). Memento: A philosophical investigation. In R. Read & J. Goodenough (Eds.), Film as philosophy: Essays on cinema after Wittgenstein and Cavell (pp. 72–93). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klevan, A. (2014). Vertigo and the spectator of film analysis. Film Philosophy, 18(Special Section on Stanley Cavell), 147–171.Google Scholar
- Leopard, D. (2013). Teaching with the screen: Pedagogy, agency, and media culture. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mulhall, S. (2002). On film. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mulhall, S. (2005). In space, no-one can hear you scream: Acknowledging the human voice in the alien universe. In R. Read & J. Goodenough (Eds.), Film as philosophy: Essays on cinema after Wittgenstein and Cavell (pp. 57–71). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Polster, B., & Ross, M. (2012). Math goes to the movies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Read, R. (2014). Ordinary/everyday language. In K. Jolley (Ed.), Wittgenstein: Key concepts. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rodowick, D. (2014). Elegy for theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Standish, P. (2012). ‘THIS is produced by a brain-process!’ Wittgenstein, transparency and psychology today. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(1), 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ter Hark, M. (2011). Wittgenstein on the experience of meaning and secondary use. In M. McGinn & O. Kuusela (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
- Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell (PI).Google Scholar
- Wittgenstein, L. (1998). Remarks on the philosophy of psychology (Vol. 1). Oxford: Blackwell (RPP).Google Scholar