Abstract
This chapter focuses on the initiatives of EU for conflict resolution, conflict prevention, conflict management and confidence building in the Asian conflicts and crises in the Middle East. The European practice for peace is full of new experiences in the Asia and Middle East. Remarkably, the important issue of international consideration concerned with Middle East is Palestine–Israel dispute that has been aflame over 60 years. On the other hand, the physical involvement of USA in Iraq was a hard decision for EU policymakers. The second part of this chapter examines the Asian issues, such as the US-Iran tension on the nuclear programme and the stress of EU on this issue. Finally, the Indo-Pak rivalry and the EU’s standpoint on the resolution.
Keywords
Arab-Israel dispute Iraq War US-Iran tension Indo-Pak rivalryBibliography
- Allison, Graham. 2004. How to Stop Nuclear Terror. Foreign Affairs, January/February 83(1): 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bower, Paul. 2004. Kashmir. Research Paper 04/28, 30, International Affairs and Defence, House of Commons Library, London. Accessed 3 May 2011.Google Scholar
- Chari, R.S., and F. Cavatorta. 2003. The Iraq War: Killing Dreams of a Unified EU? European Political Science 3(1): 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Daalder, Ivo H., and James M. Lindsay. 2003. America Unbound – The Bush Revolution. Washington, DC: Foreign Policy, Brookings Institution Press, 184.Google Scholar
- David, Allen, and Pijpers Alfred. 1984. European Foreign Policy-Making and the Arab-Israeli Conflict. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
- Finkelstein, Norman. 1991. Israel and Iraq: A Double Standard. Journal of Palestine Studies 20(2), Winter: 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gawdat, Bahgat. 1999. The Persian Gulf at the Dawn of the New Millennium. Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
- Gerges, Fawaz A. 2002. Illusions of Iraqi Democracy. Washington Post, October 8, p. 25.Google Scholar
- Harvey, Sicherman. 1985. Europe’s Role in the Middle East: Illusions and Realities. Orbis 28, N°4, hiver.Google Scholar
- Hill, Christopher. 1998. Closing the Capabilities-Expectations Gap. In A Common Foreign and Security Policy for Europe?, ed. John Peterson and Helen Sjursen, 18–38. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hoffmann, S. 2000. Towards a Common Foreign and Security Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 38(2): 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ilan, Greilsammer, and Weiler Joseph. 1987. Europe’s Middle East Dilemma: The Quest for a Unified Stance. Boulder and London: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Ismael, T.Y., and J.S. Ismael 1994. The Gulf War and the New World Order. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
- Khadduri, Majid. 1990. Iraq’s Claim to the Sovereignty of Kuwait. Journal of International Law and Politics 23(1), Fall: 5–28.Google Scholar
- Khalaf, Roua. 2004. Iran Fails to Declare Nuclear Design. Financial Times, 12 February.Google Scholar
- McCarney, James. 1991 Saddam May Win by Losing. The Honolulu Advertiser, 9 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
- Peterson, J., and H. Sjursen. 2003. A Common Foreign Policy for Europe? Competing Visions of the CFSP. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Pinto, Do Ceu. 2001. Sanctioning Iran: US-European Disputes over Policy Towards Iran. The International Spectator XXXVI(2), April/June: 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spyer, Jonathan 2007. Israel and the Iraq Study Group Report. Strategic Insights VI(2), March. Center for Contemporary Conflict. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey.Google Scholar