From Project to Permanence: Growing Inter-institutional Collaborative Teams into Long-Term, Sustainable Communities of Practice

  • Cath Fraser
  • Judith Honeyfield
  • Fiona Breen
  • Mervyn Protheroe
  • Victor Fester
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

The opportunity for academics to draw on concepts, methods and insights from colleagues in disciplines and organisations other than their own is well recognised as an effective strategy to promote the interconnectivity of knowledge, and pursue new learning and understanding. In the right circumstances, with the right nurturing, one-off project collaborations can become long-term communities of practice, ensuring social and professional learning well past the original project’s expiry date. This chapter outlines learning from a recently completed research project in which the five authors, representing three New Zealand Institutes of Technology and Polytechnics (ITPs), conducted a first-of-its-kind national survey, together with follow-up interviews, of the effectiveness of collaboration within funded projects and longer term outcomes—including staff engagement, enhanced networking opportunities and sustainable communities of practice. We begin with a brief description of the New Zealand higher education environment and the role of Ako Aotearoa, together with a commentary on the authors’ own community of practice, followed by an outline of the recently completed research project entitled A national evaluation of inter-institutional collaborations. Next, a survey of the literature is summarised in which the concept of communities of practice and the nature of collaborative communities are interrogated. Following this, the findings of the study are shared—these include: factors that affected collaborative communities, accounts of the development of relationships that progressed from initial collaboration through to more well-developed communities of practice, and evidence of benefits to multiple stakeholders. Finally, details of the good practice guide we produced to assist future collaborative project teams in the higher education sector are shared, together with an identification of several related areas that warrant further study.

Keywords

Inter-institutional Across discipline Collaborative advantage Collaborative communities Sustainability 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ako Aotearoa. (n.d.). https://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/ako-aotearoa. Accessed 6 November 2015.
  2. Andriessen, J. H. E. (2005). Archetypes of knowledge communities. In P. van den Besselaar, G. De Michelis, J. Preece, & C. Simone (Eds.), Communities and technologies (pp. 191–213). Milan: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Breen, F., Protheroe, M., Fraser, C., Honeyfield, J., & Fester, V. (2015a). A national evaluation of funded inter-institutional research collaborations: A work in progress. In Southland institute of Technology journal of Applied Research (Special Edition: 2014 NTLT conference proceedings). https://www.sit.ac.nz/SITJAR
  4. Breen, F., Protheroe, M., Fraser, C., Honeyfield, J., & Fester, V. (2015b). Research collaborations: What are the benefits for Learning Advisors? In ATLAANZ Refereed Conference Proceedings 2014. www.atlaanz.org
  5. Buckley, S., & Giannakopoulos, A. (2012). Knowledge sharing through communities of practice. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Intellectual Capital. April18–19, 2011, Nicosia, Cyprus. pp.103–112. Reading: Academic Publishing International Limited.Google Scholar
  6. Cambridge, D., Kaplan, S., & Suter, V. (2005). Community of practice design guide: A step-by-step guide for designing and cultivating communities of practice in higher education. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/nli0531.pdf
  7. Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 527–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cumming, J. (2008). Acknowledging conflict in communities of practice: A case study from doctoral education. In Engaging communities, proceedings of the 31st HERDSA annual conference, Rotorua, NZ. 1–4 July 2008 (pp. 117–125).Google Scholar
  9. Czajkowski, J. M. (2007). Leading successful inter-institutional collaboration using the collaboration success measurement model. http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/community/chair/conference/2007/papers/leading_successful_interinstitutional_collaborations.pdf
  10. Denzin, N. K. (2009). The elephant in the living room: Or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research, 9(2), 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerritson, J. (2007). Trust and collegiality at heart of quality teaching. New Zealand Education Review, 12(36), 2–3.Google Scholar
  12. Gewirtz, S., Shapiro, J., Maguire, M., Mahony, P., & Cribb, A. (2009). Doing teacher research: A qualitative analysis of purposes, processes and experiences. Educational Action Research, 17(4), 567–583. doi: 10.1080/09650790903309433 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 28(3), 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanna, M., & Robinson, B. (1994). Strategies for community empowerment. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hoadley, C. (2012). What is a community of practice and how can we support it? In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (2nd ed., pp. 286–300). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Hoadley, C., & Kilner, P. G. (2005). Using technology to transform communities of practice into knowledge-building communities. SIGGROUP Bulletin, 25(1), 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hogue, J. (1993). Community based collaboration: Community wellness multiplied. http://www.uvm.edu/crs/nnco/collab/wellness.html
  18. Huxham, C. (1996). Collaboration and collaborative advantage. In Huxham (Ed.), Creating collaborative advantage. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Jakovljevic, M., Buckley, S. & Bushney, M. (2013). Forming communities of practice in higher education: A theoretical perspective. In Proceedings of MakeLearn conference, 19–21 June 2013, Zadar, Croatia. ToKnow Press, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  20. Kimble, C. (2006). Communities of practice: Never knowingly undersold. In E. Tomadaki & P. Scott (Eds.), Innovative approaches for learning and knowledge sharing, EC-TEL 2006 Workshop Proceedings. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c0a3/680fe2a1d1789ccade7875c68ccafbbeebff.pdf#page=229
  21. Kristoff, Y. (2005). Collaboration: Why and how. The Medium, 45(1), 25.Google Scholar
  22. Learning Theories Knowledgebase. (2009). Communities of practice (Lave and Wenger) at Learning-Theories.com. https://www.learning-theories.com/communities-of-practice-lave-and-wenger.html
  23. Lucas, A. O. (2005). International collaboration in health research. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation, 83(7), 482.Google Scholar
  24. Lyon, D., Steele, L., & Fraser, C. (2015). Smaller by design: How good practice features from MOOCS can be adapted to enhance core curricula delivery. In M. Childs, C. Karp, M. Keppell, & S. Reushle (Eds.), Open learning and formal credentialing in higher education: Curriculum models and institutional policies. Open learning and formal credentialing in higher education. Hershey: IGI Global Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Manalo, E., Marshall, J., & Fraser, C. (Eds.) (2009). Student learning support programmers that demonstrate tangible impact on student retention, pass rates and/or completion. Auckland: ATLAANZ. Retrieved from http://www.atlaanz.org/research-and-publications
  26. Mattessich, P., Murray-Close, M., & Monsey, B. (2001a). Collaboration: What makes it work: A review of research literature on factors influencing successful collaboration (Vol. 2). Saint Paul, MN: Wilder Research Center.Google Scholar
  27. Mattessich, P., Murray-Close, M., & Monsey, B. (2001b). Collaboration factors inventory: Assessing your collaboration’s strengths. Saint Paul, MN: Fieldstone Alliance.Google Scholar
  28. McCallin, A. M. (2007). Pluralistic dialoguing: A theory of interdisciplinary teamworking. In B. G. Glaser & J. Horton (Eds.), The grounded theory seminar reader. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  29. Moxley, V. (2005). Inter-institutional academic alliances—when, why, who and how. Paper presented at the Academic Chairpersons Conference, Orlando, Florida. Retrieved from http://www.k-state.edu/iaa/Resources/Alliances.doc
  30. Prebble, T., Hargraves, H., Leach, L., Naidoo, K., Suddaby, G., & Zepke, N. (2004). Impact of student support services and academic development programmes on student outcomes in undergraduate tertiary study: A synthesis of the research. Report to the Ministry of Education, Ministry of Education: Wellington.Google Scholar
  31. Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to lead in higher education. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smart, W., Smyth, R., & Hendy, S. (2013). An analysis of collaborative journal article authorship at New Zealand universities. http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/tertiary_education/130421
  33. Smith, M. K. (2009). Communities of practice. The encyclopedia of informal education. www.infed.org/biblio/communities_of_practice.htm
  34. Sveiby, K.-E., & Simons, R. (2002). Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work—An empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 420–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tyler, J., Wilkinson, D. M., & Huberman, B. A. (2003): Email as spectroscopy: Automated discovery of community structure within organizations. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Communities and Technologies; C&T 2003, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  36. Wenger, E. (2006). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. http://www.ewenger.com/theory/index.htm
  37. Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wood, D. J., & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 139–162. doi: 10.1177/0021886391272001
  39. Woods, P., Bennett, N., Harvey, J., & Wise, C. (2004). Variables and dualities in distributed leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 32(4), 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Willis, P., & Trondman, M. (2000). Manifesto for Ethnography. Ethnography, 1(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wolff, T. (2002). A practical approach to evaluating coalitions. In T. Backer (Ed.), Evaluating community collaborations (pp. 57–112). New York: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Yin, R. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cath Fraser
    • 1
  • Judith Honeyfield
    • 1
  • Fiona Breen
    • 2
  • Mervyn Protheroe
    • 2
  • Victor Fester
    • 3
  1. 1.Bay of Plenty PolytechnicTaurangaNew Zealand
  2. 2.WeltecWellingtonNew Zealand
  3. 3.Otago PolytechnicDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations