Religious Environmentalism and Environmental Sustainability in Asia

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Communication, Culture and Change in Asia book series (CCCA, volume 2)

Abstract

The phase of the eight millennium development goals (MDGs) adopted by the United Nations at the beginning of 2000 has given way to the program of seventeen sustainable development goals (SDGs) ratified in 2015, to be implemented until 2030. While the number of SDGs is more than twice that of MDGs and more comprehensive in outlook, examination of the individual goals indicates that most if not all of the SDGs are either directly related to environmental sustainability or indirectly concerned with the quality of the environment. This is not surprising because nations have realized, if somewhat late, that human well-being cannot be dissociated from the quality of ecosystems. The escalating global environmental crisis threatens economic and social stability and makes the innate human desire for happiness even more difficult to attain. The issue, moreover, has grown into something that cannot be confined to a single or even a few sectors of society, or that can be adequately addressed by politicians or scientists alone. Rather, achieving environmental sustainability, which is an essential component of the SDGs program, requires an interdisciplinary, dialectical, and dialogical approach involving a diverse collection of individuals, groups, organizations, and institutions. Political will, social and economic reforms, scientific and technological know-how, and religious and personal commitment are all part of the effort to address the environmental woes of the modern era. The role and contribution of religious systems and traditions for the achievement of SDGs , particularly in Asia, is the focus of this chapter. This chapter aims to present the following: (1) stating the reasons why religion is essential to the aspirations of the SDGs in Asia and (2) exploring how the major religions in Asia can contribute to promoting environmental sustainability by providing a framework for (a) assessing the root cause of environmental destruction; (b) envisioning a religious-based approach to how human beings could relate to the natural environment; and (c) presenting how religion promotes harmonious human-nature relationship through a program of self-cultivation and self-transformation . This chapter hopes to demonstrate that the task of achieving the SDGs in Asia is tied with the concern of religion and progress depends greatly on the improved state of human moral and spiritual well-being that religion aims to promote.

Keyword

Religion Environmentalism Asian cultures Inter-religious dialogue 

Abbreviations

A

Aṅguttara

D

Digha Nikāya

Dp

Dhammapada

J

Jātaka

M

Majjhima Nikāya

S

Saṃyutta Nikāya

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barclay, E. (2007, October 31). African fishermen find way of conservation in the Koran. The Christian Science Monitor October 31, 2007. Accessed 26 February 2016. http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1031/p01s04-woaf.html
  2. Bhikkhu, B. (1994). A buddhist response to contemporary dilemmas of human existence. Accessed 10 May 2012. http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/bodhi/response.html
  3. Bhikkhu, B. (2003). (Trans.). The connected discourses of the buddha: A translation of the Saṃyutta Nikāya, 2nd edn. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Bhikkhu, B. (2012). (Trans.). The numerical discourses of the buddha: A complete translation of the Anguttara Nikaya. Annotated edition. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Bonaventure. (1978). The life of St. Francis. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  6. Butkus, R. A. (2002). The stewardship of creation (pp. 17–23). The Centre for Christian Ethics at Baylor University.Google Scholar
  7. Cafaro, P. (2005). Gluttony, arrogance, greed, and apathy: An exploration of environmental vice. In R. Sandler & P. Cafaro (Eds.), Environmental virtue ethics (pp. 135–158). New York: Rowman & Littlefiled Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Callicott, J. B. (1984). Non-anthropocentric value theory and environmental ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly, 21(4), 299–309.Google Scholar
  9. Cavanaugh, W. T. (2009). The myth of religious violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choi, H. M. (2009). Interreligious dialogue: Toward overcoming the eco-crisis. International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture, 12, 157–192.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, S. (1998). Nirvana and other buddhist felicities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellwood, R., & Alles, G. (2007). Encyclopedia of world religion. New York: Infobase Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Gada, M. Y. (2014). Environmental ethics in Islam: Principles and perspectives. World Journal of Islamic History and Civilization, 4(4), 130–138.Google Scholar
  14. Hansen, C. (2010). Chinese confucianism and daoism. In C. Taliaferro, P. Draper, & P. L. Quinn (Eds.), A companion to philosophy of religion (pp. 23–33). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hargrove, E. (2003). Weak anthropocentric intrinsic value. In A. Light & H. Rolston III (Eds.), Environmental ethics: An antholog (pp. 175–190). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Hoffman, A. J., & Sandelands, L. E. (2005). Getting right with nature: Anthropocentrism, ecocentrism, and theocentrism. Organization & Environment, 18(2), 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ives, C. (2013). Resources for buddhist environmental ethics. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 20, 541–571.Google Scholar
  18. Jusoff, K., & Samah, S. A. A. (2011). Environmental sustainability: What Islam propagates. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12, 46–53.Google Scholar
  19. Kalupahana, D. J. (1976). Buddhist philosophy: A historical analysis. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  20. Keown, D. (2001). The nature of buddhist ethics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Keown, D. (2007). Buddhism and ecology: A virtue ethics approach. Contemporary Buddhism, 8(2), 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Küng, H. (2004). Global responsibility: In search of a new world ethic. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Le Duc, A. (2015). Buddhist soteriological aims and their contribution to environmental well-being. In R. Meinhold (Ed.), Environmental values emerging from cultures and religions of the ASEAN region (pp. 31–53). Bangkok: P. Press.Google Scholar
  24. McShane, K. (2007). Anthropocentrism vs. nonanthropocentrism: Why should we care? Environmental Values, 16, 169–185.Google Scholar
  25. Meinhold, R. (2011). Overconsumption. In Encyclopedia of environmental issues, revised edition, 1186. Pasadena: Salem Press.Google Scholar
  26. Minteer, B. A. (2008). Anthropocentrism. In J. B. Callicott & R. Frodeman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of environmental ethics and philosophy (pp. 58–62). Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA.Google Scholar
  27. Nadeau, R. L. (2014). Asian religions: A cultural perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Nasr, S. H. (1992). Islam and the environmental crisis. In S. C. Rockefeller & J. C. Elder (Eds.), Spirit and nature: Why the environment is a religious issue (pp. 86–108). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  29. Nasr, S. H. (2007). Religion and the environmental crisis. In W. C. Chittick (Ed.), The essential Seyyed Hossein Nasr (pp. 39–42). Bloomington: World Wisdom Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Norton, B. G. (1984). Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism. Environmental Ethics, 6(2), 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thera, N. (2008). The roots of good and evil: Buddhist texts translated from the Pāḷi. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.Google Scholar
  32. Ogbonnaya, J. (2014). African catholicism and hermeneutics of culture: Essays in the light of African Synod II. Eugene: Or: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
  33. Palmer, M., & Finlay, V. (2003). Faith in conservation: New approaches to religion and the environment. World Bank: Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  34. Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life. (2016a). The global religious landscape. Accessed 24 February 2016. http://www.pewforum.org/2012/12/18/global-religious-landscape-exec/
  35. Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life. (2016b). Demographic study: Asia-Pacific. Accessed 25 February 2016. http://www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/asia-pacific/
  40. Sahni, P. (2007). Environmental ethics in buddhism: A virtues approach. Routledge: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  41. Sawyer, J. (2015). Introduction. In J. Sawyer & D. Jin (Eds.), Ecological civilization. Beijing: Pulitzer Center. Kindle edition.Google Scholar
  42. Schaefer, J. (2005). Valuing earth intrinsically and instrumentally: A Theological framework for environmental ethics. Theological Studies, 66(4), 783–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Servaes, J. (Ed.). (2014). Technological determinism and social change. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, H. (2009). The world’s religions (p. 2009). New York: Publishers Group UK.Google Scholar
  45. Stackhouse, M. L. (2007). God and globalization: Volume 4 (globalization and grace). New York: Continuum Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  46. Streng, F. J. (1984). Understanding religious life. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Pub Co.Google Scholar
  47. Taylor, R. L. (1990). The religious dimensions of confucianism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tucker, M. E., & Grim, J. (1997). Series foreword. In M. E. Tucker & D. R. Williams (Eds.), Buddhism and ecology (pp. xv–xxxiii). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Tucker, M. E., & Berthrong, J. (1998). “Introduction.” In M. E. Tucker & J. Berthrong (Eds.), Confucianism and ecology (pp. xxxv–xlv). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.Google Scholar
  50. Warner, K. (2001). Franciscan environmental ethic: Imaging creation as a community of care. Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, 31(1), 143–160.Google Scholar
  51. Weiming, T. (1998). Beyond the enlightenment mentality. In M. E. Tucker & J. Berthrong (Eds.), Confucianism and ecology (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Van Wensveen, L. (2000). Christian ecological virtue ethics. In D. T. Hessel & R. R. Ruether (Eds.), Christianity and ecology (pp. 155–167). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. White Jr, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Asian Research Center for the Study of Religion and Social CommunicationBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations