Responding to the New Graffiti Writing Culture: Broader Publics, Art Worlds, and the Sphere of Commodity Exchange

  • Ronald Kramer
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter extends the focus on post-1989 writing culture by exploring how broader publics and cultural institutions respond to contemporary graffiti. Contrary to the claims of political elites, it suggests that much of the public appreciate some forms of graffiti, especially the elaborate and colorful murals. Alongside growing public acceptance, graffiti has managed to carve out a small, but stable space for itself in the art world and is often incorporated into advertisements. While graffiti writers appreciate the benefits of such cultural incorporation, they are also aware of the dangers of being exploited within these commercial domains. As graffiti has been incorporated by art worlds and cultural industries, it also utilizes new communication technologies to further its own interests, which has spurred the consolidation of a global community of graffiti writers.

Keywords

Culture Art Exploitation Graffiti Urban space 

Bibliography

  1. Adorno, Theodor, and Max Horkheimer. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, Joe. “More to See than a Canvas in a White Cube: For an Art in the Streets.” City 14, no. 1–2 (2010): 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crane, Diana. The Transformation of the Avant-garde: The New York Art World, 1940–1985. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  4. Hall, Stuart, and Tony Jefferson. Resistance Through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post-war Britain. London: Hutchinson, 1976.Google Scholar
  5. Hebdidge, Dick. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Routledge, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. Hutcheon, Stephen, Louisa Hearn, and David Braithwaite. “Australia Bans Graffiti Game.” Sydney Morning Herald, February 16, 2006. Accessed on July 27, 2016: http://www.smh.com.au/news/breaking/graffiti-game-banned-in-australia/2006/02/15/1139890798010.html.
  7. La Ferla, Ruth. “CK One’s New Motif.” New York Times, May 6, 2003: Section 13, 8.Google Scholar
  8. Macdonald, Dwight. “A Theory of Mass Culture.” In Mass Culture: The Popular Arts in America, edited by B. Rosenberg and D. W. White, 59–73. New York: Macmillan, 1957.Google Scholar
  9. MacDowall, Lachlan. “#Instafame: Aesthetics, Audiences, Data.” In Graffiti and Street Art: Reading, Writing and Representing the City, edited by K. Avramidis and M. Tsilimpounidi. London: Routledge, 2016. forthcoming.Google Scholar
  10. Marcano, Tony. “TATS Cru Wins Coca-Cola Account.” New York Times, April 16, 1995: Section 13, 4.Google Scholar
  11. Marriott, Michael. “Too Legit to Quit.” New York Times, October 3, 1993: Section 13, 4.Google Scholar
  12. Martin, Richard A. “The Rebirth of the New York Sneakerhead.” New York Times, July 11, 2004: Section 14, 4.Google Scholar
  13. Mooney, Jake. “Times Magazine Gets Down with It.” New York Times, June 26, 2005: Section 14, 5.Google Scholar
  14. Muro, Matt. “He Discovered the Antidote to Pharmacy School.” New York Times, September 2, 2001: Section 14, 3.Google Scholar
  15. Richtel, Matt. “Sony Got Hip, but the Hipsters Got Sony.” New York Times, December 12, 2005: Section C, 8.Google Scholar
  16. Ross, Jeffrey Ian. “Graffiti Goes to the Movies: American Fictional Films Featuring Graffiti Artists/Writers and Themes.” Contemporary Justice Review 18, no. 3 (2015): 366–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ross, Jeffrey Ian. “How American Movies Depict Graffiti and Street Art.” In Routledge Handbook of Graffiti and Street Art, edited by J.I. Ross, 429–439. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
  18. Snyder, Gregory. Graffiti Lives: Beyond the Tag in New York’s Urban Underground. New York: New York University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald Kramer
    • 1
  1. 1.Sociology and CriminologyUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations