Advertisement

Overview of Detection and Estimation of High-Speed Railway Catenary

  • Zhigang Liu
Chapter
Part of the Advances in High-speed Rail Technology book series (ADVHIGHSPEED)

Abstract

The current collection quality of pantograph-catenary system directly determines the stability and safe operation of power supply in high-speed railway, and is also one of the key factors that determine the maximum running speed of the train.

Keywords

Contact Line Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition Dynamic Estimation Contact Wire Image Processing Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Han Z, Liu Z, Zhang G, Yang H (2013) Overview of non-contact image detection technology for the pantograph-catenary monitoring. J China Railway 35(6):40–47Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’ Donnell C, Palacin R, Rosinski J (2006) Pantograph damage and wear monitoring system. In: The Institution of engineering and technology international conference on railway condition monitoring, pp 178–181Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shing AWC, Pascoschi G (2006) Contact wire wear measurement and data management. In The institution of engineering and technology international conference on railway condition monitoring, pp 182–187Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boffi P, Cattaneo G, Amoriello L et al (2009) Optical fiber sensors to measure collector performance in the pantograph-catenary interaction. IEEE Sens J 9(6):635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu J (1998) Non-contact inspection of parameter of overhead contact system. Electr Railway 02:43–45Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu F, Wang L, Gao X et al (2006) Study of measuring the contact force between pantograph and catenary. Electr Locomotives Mass Transit Veh 06:19–21Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ren S (2000) New pantograph wear detection and auto descending device. Railway Oper Technol 6(04):139–141Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu J (1996) The system for detecting pull-out value of contact wire in electrified railway. J China Railway Soc 18(02):78–81Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu H, Wang L, Gao X (2004) Current situation and prospects of the detection technology for the contact-loss of pantograph on electric locomotive. Locomotive Rolling Stock Technol 6:1–4Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu Z, Liu S, Wu D et al (2004) The catenary geometric parameters measuring. Shandong Sci 17(01):67–69Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hofler H, Dambacher M, Dimopoulos N et al (2004) Monitoring and inspecting overhead wires and supporting structures. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Parma, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu Y, Liu Z, Wen X et al (2002) A laser detecting device for measuring position of contact wire in OCS. Electr Railway 4:29–30Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peng C, Wang L, Gao X et al (2004) Dynamic detection for the height of contact wire. Opto Electron Eng S1:91–93Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuen LK, Lee TKY, Ho SL et al (2006) A novel intelligent train condition monitoring system coupling laser beam into image processing algorithm. Trans Hong Kong Inst Eng 13(1):27–33Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kimura S (1993) Development of an automated consumables control system. Japan Railway Eng 32(3):21–24Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Puschmann R, Wehrhahn D (2011) Ultrasonic measurement of contact wire position. eb—Elektrische Bahnen 109(7):323–324Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yin B, Wang B (2008) Application of ultrasonic ranging principle in monitoring abrasion of pantograph slider. Electr Drive Locomotives 05:57–59Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sun F, Wang B (2011) Ultrasonic detection method of abrasion of double slippers pantograph. Dev Innovation Mach Electr Prod 24(03):129–131Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang T (2008) Study and improvement on the OCS inspection system based on image processing. Railway Locomotive Car 28(6):68–71Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Niwakawa M, Onda T, Kinoshita N (2007) Stereo vision based measurement of intersections of overhead contact wires and pantograph of Kyushushinkansen. IEEJ Trans Ind Appl 127(2):118–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kusumi S, Nezu K, Nagasawa H (2000) Overhead contact line inspection system by rail-and-road car. Q Rep RTRI 41(4):169–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakama F, Ichikawa M, Nagasawa H (1984) Measurement of contact loss by detection spark. Q Rep RTRI 25(3):95–98Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hayasaka T, Shimizu M, Nezu K (2009) Development of contact-loss measuring system using ultraviolet ray detection. Q Rep RTRI 50(3):131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Landi A, Menconi L, Sani L (2006) Hough transform and thermo-vision for monitoring pantograph-catenary system. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 220(4):435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hulin B, Schussler S (2007) Concepts for day-night stereo obstacle detection in the pantograph gauge. In: 2007 5th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics, pp 449–454Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jiang J (2009) The design and realization of catenary wind deviation. Central South University, ChangshaGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang K, Wang L, Gao X et al (2009) Application of CCD measurement technique for wear on pantograph sliding plates. In: 4th international symposium on advanced optical manufacturing and testing technologies, pp 728334–728334-7Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang Y, Wu W, Xu K (2007) Detection system of dynamic envelope line of pantograph based on machine vision. Electr Railway 6:29–30Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen K (2009) Development and implementation of wireless video monitoring system for locomotive pantograph. Southwest Jiaotong University, ChengduGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fan H, Bian C, Zhu T et al (2010) Automatic detection of positioning line in contactless overhead contact system. J Comput Appl 30(S2):102–103Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Feng Q, Chen W, Wang Y et al (2010) Research on the algorithm to measure the pantographic slipper abrasion. J China Railway Soc 32(01):109–113Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang G, Liu Z, Han Y et al (2013) A fast fuzzy matching method of fault detection for rod insulators of high-speed railways. J China Railway Soc 35(05):27–33MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Han Z, Liu Z, Chen K et al (2011) Pantograph slide cracks detection technology based on curvelet coefficients directional projection (CCDP). J China Railway Soc 33(11):63–69Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chen K, Liu Z, Han Z (2012) Pantograph slipper cracks identification based on translational parallel window in curvelet transform domain. J China Railway Soc 34(10):44–46Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Han Z, Liu Z, Yang H et al (2013) Insulator fault detection based on curvelet coefficients morphology and zonal energy methods. J China Railway Soc 35(03):37–40Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yang H, Liu Z, Han Z et al (2013) Foreign body detection between insulator pieces in electrified railway based on affine moment invariant. J China Railway Soc 35(04):30–36Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Han Y, Liu Z, Han Z et al (2014) Fracture detection of ear pieces in catenary support devices of high-speed railway based on SIFT feature matching. J China Railway Soc 36(02):31–36Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yang H, Liu Z, Han Y et al (2013) Defective condition detection of insulators in electrified railway based on feature matching of speeded-up robust features. Power Syst Technol 37(8):2297–2302Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang W, Mei G, Chen L (2000) Analysis of the influence of catenary’s sag and irregularity upon the quality of current-feeding. J China Railway Soc 22(6):50–54Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Aboshi M, Manabe K (2000) Analyses of contact force fluctuation between catenary and pantograph. Q Rep RTRI 41(4):182–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Collina A, Fossati F, Papi M et al (2007) Impact of overhead line irregularity on current collection and diagnostics based on the measurement of pantograph dynamics. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 221(4):547–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bucca G, Collina A (2009) A procedure for the wear prediction of collector strip and contact wire in pantograph–catenary system. Wear 266(1):46–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Van Vo O, Massat JP, Laurent C et al (2014) Introduction of variability into pantograph–catenary dynamic simulations. Veh Syst Dyn 52(10):1254–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Howa F (1995) Research on the high speed of the flow system of the new main line. Electr Traction Express 10:20–25Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Aboshi M (2004) Precise measurement and estimation method for overhead contact line unevenness. IEE J T Ind Appl 124:871–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhang W, Mei G, Wu X et al (2002) Hybrid simulation of dynamics for the pantograph-catenary system. Veh Syst Dyn 38(6):393–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Huan R, Jiao J, Su G et al (2012) Dynamics of pantograph-catenary coupled system with contact wire vertical irregularities. J China Railway Soc 34(7):15–21Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Xie J, Liu Z, Han Z et al (2009) Pantograph and overhead contact line coupling dynamic model simulation and analysis of imbalance of overhead contact line. Electr Railway 6:23–26Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Liu Z, Han Z (2011) Review of researches on catenary spectrum in electrified railway. Electr Railway 1:1–3Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Liu Z, Han Z (2013) Study on electrical railway catenary line spectrum based on AR model. J China Railway Soc 35(12):24–29Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jiang Y, Zhang W, Song D (2015) Study on the contact wire unevenness of high-speed railway. J China Railway Soc 37(2):34–38Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bruni S, Ambrosio J, Carnicero A et al (2015) The results of the pantograph–catenary interaction benchmark. Veh Syst Dyn 53(3):412–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kim JW, Chae HC, Park BS et al (2007) State sensitivity analysis of the pantograph system for a high-speed rail vehicle considering span length and static uplift force. J Sound Vib 303(3):405–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wang H, Liu Z, Han Z et al (2014) Feature extraction of pantograph-catenary contact force power spectrum of electrified railway. J China Railway Soc 36(11):23–28MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kusumi S, Fukutani T, Nezu K (2006) Diagnosis of overhead contact line based on contact force. Q Rep RTRI 47(1):39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rønnquist A, Nåvik P (2015) Dynamic assessment of existing soft catenary systems using modal analysis to explore higher train velocities: a case study of a Norwegian contact line system. Veh Syst Dyn 53(6):756–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kudo S, Honda S, Ikeda M (2002) Contact force signal analysis of current collecting with bispectrum and wavelet. In: Proceedings of the 41st SICE annual conference, IEEE, vol 4, pp 2478–2482Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kim JS (2007) An experimental study of the dynamic characteristics of the catenary-pantograph interface in high speed trains. J Mech Sci Technol 21(12):2108–2116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Han Z (2013) The dynamic characteristics assessment of high-speed catenary-pantograph based on modern spectrum analysis and intelligent fault image identification. Southwest Jiaotong University Graduate Thesis, ChengduGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Han Z, Liu Z, Zhang X et al (2013) Pantograph-catenary contact force data analysis based on data correlation decomposed by EEMD. J China Railway Soc 35(9):25–30Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wang H, Liu Zhigang, Song Yang (2015) Analysis on wavelength components in pantograph-catenary contact force of electric railway based on multiple EEMD. J China Railway Soc 37(5):34–41MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rønnquist A, Nåvik P (2015) Dynamic assessment of existing soft catenary systems using modal analysis to explore higher train velocities: a case study of a Norwegian contact line system. Veh Syst Dyn 53(6):756–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Usuda T (2007) Estimation of wear and strain of contact wire using contact force of pantograph. Q Rep RTRI 48(3):170–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Mariscotti A, Marrese A, Pasquino N et al (2013) Time and frequency characterization of radiated disturbance in telecommunication bands due to pantograph. Measurement 46(10):4342–4352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Liu Z, Song Y, Han Y et al (2016) Advances of research on high-speed railway catenary. J Southwest Jiaotong Univ 51(3):495–518Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations