Standard Zygoma Reduction with Intraoral Approach

  • Sanghoon Park


  1. 1.

    The purpose of reduction malarplasty is to reduce the width of the cheekbone. However, surgeons should consider changing the boxy and flat facial contour into a three-dimensional shape and achieving a smooth, feminine facial line as a major purpose of reduction malarplasty.

  2. 2.

    The key variables to be evaluated are bizygomatic width, volume and position of the zygomatic body. The amount of ostectomy is determined considering volume of zygomatic body.

  3. 3.

    The zygomatic body and arch are usually moved medially, posteriorly, and sometimes superiorly or inferiorly during the surgery; the point of maximal malar projection (MMP) is marked and its new ideal position is carefully planned.

  4. 4.

    Overall facial shape including mandibular prominence and facial length should be considered in planning reduction malarplasty. Particular care should be taken for patients with a long face, as excessive reduction has risk of making the face to appear longer after the surgery.

  5. 5.

    Reduction malarplasty can be performed solely or in combination with other facial bone contouring surgeries such as mandible reduction, genioplasty, or forehead augmentation.

  6. 6.

    Soft tissue has a great effect on the results in reduction malarplasty. In patients with abundant cheek fat and sagging skin, the slimming effect might be less obvious and cheek drooping is more probable.

  7. 7.

    The following five factors are considered high risks for skin and soft tissue sagging generally: (1) age over 40 years, (2) abundant cheek fat, (3) thin skin and skin laxity, (4) class II mandible or ill-defined mandible neck line, and (5) deep nasolabial fold or jowl.



  1. 1.
    Kang JS, editor. Plastic surgery. Seoul: Koonja; 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hinderer UT. Malar implants for improvement of the facial appearance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;56(2):157–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilkinson TS. Complications in aesthetic malar augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;71(5):643–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Onizuka T, Watanabe K, Takasu K, Keyama A. Reduction malarplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg. 1983;7(2):121–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang DB, Park CG. Infracture technique for the zygomatic body and arch reduction. Aesthet Plast Surg. 1992;16(4):355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cho BC. Reduction malarplasty using osteotomy and repositioning of the malar complex: clinical review and comparison of two techniques. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14(3):383–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim YH, Seul JH. Reduction malarplasty through an intraoral incision: a new method. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(7):1514–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Agban GM. Augmentation and corrective malarplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 1979;2(4):306–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Uhm KI, Lew JM. Prominent zygoma in Orientals: classification and treatment. Ann Plast Surg. 1991;26(2):164–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kook MS, Jung S, Park HJ, Ryu SY, Oh HK. Reduction malarplasty using modified L-shaped osteotomy. J Oral Maxillo fac Surg. 2012;70(1):e87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hong SE, Liu SY, Kim JT, Lee JH. Intraoral reduction malarplasty using L-shaped osteotomy. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(3):758–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morris DE, Moaveni Z, Lo LJ. Aesthetic facial skeletal contouring in the Asian patient. Clin Plast Surg. 2007;34(3):547–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baek SM, Chung YD, Kim SS. Reduction malarplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;88(1):53–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Facial Bone Surgery, Department of Plastic SurgeryID HospitalSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations